| Literature DB >> 28858851 |
Bo Han1,2, Xiangqi Meng1,2, Hui Chen1,2, Lingchao Chen2,3, Xing Liu2,4, Hongjun Wang1,2, Daming Liu1,2, Fei Gao5, Lin Lin1,2, Jianguang Ming1,2, Bo Sun1,2, Shi Yin1,2, Ruijia Wang1,2, Pengfei Wu1,2, Jinquan Cai1,6,2, Chuanlu Jiang1,6,2.
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most malignant type of brain tumor, and its high invasiveness and multiplication severely shortens patients' overall survival. The embryonic pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) isoform is highly expressed in human cancer. We used computational target gene prediction, in vitro cell culture, immunoblotting, quantitative real-time PCR, ATP measurements, luciferase reporter assays, wound-healing assays, Transwell assays, RNA immunoprecipitation PCR, co-immunoprecipitation, flow cytometry and tumor xenografts to study the regulation of the PKM2/β-catenin axis in glioma. PKM2 was predicted to be a potential target of miR-338. MiR-338 was downregulated in high-grade gliomas due to hypermethylation of CpG islands in its promoter, and ectopic expression of miR-338 inhibited cell proliferation, invasion and ATP generation. MiR-338 inhibited PKM2 expression by binding to the 3' untranslated region of PKM2, which ultimately prevented binding of PKM2 to β-catenin and reduced T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor reporter gene transcriptional activity. MiR-338 also inhibited PKM2 expression, attenuated glioma growth and prolonged survival in an animal model. These results confirm that miR-338, a tumor suppressor, suppresses the PKM2/β-catenin axis and is downregulated in glioblastoma. This provides a theoretical basis for glioma-targeting therapy.Entities:
Keywords: MiR-338; PKM2; epigenetic modification; glioblastoma; β-catenin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28858851 PMCID: PMC5611983 DOI: 10.18632/aging.101271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1PKM2 correlated with glioma grade progression and promoted glioma cell proliferation and invasion
(A) PKM2 expression and its correlation with glioma grade prognosis in the CGGA and REMBRANDT. (B) IHC staining depicting the difference in PKM2 expression between low‐grade and high‐grade gliomas. (C) Kaplan‐Meier survival curves indicating cumulative survival as a function of time for patients with high versus low PKM2 expression. (D) Representative images of Transwell assays of cells after transfection. Number of invading cells shown as a histogram (P<0.05). (E) Cell viability was examined with a CCK‐8 assay at different time intervals after transfection. (F) ATP level assay at different time intervals after transfection (P<0.05).
Figure 2MiR‐338 binds to and degrades PKM2 transcripts through the RISC
(A) Graphic of the seed sequence of miR‐338 matched with the 3′‐UTR of the PKM2 gene, and the design of wild‐type or mutant PKM2 3′‐UTRs containing reporter constructs. Luciferase reporter assays in glioma cells after co‐transfection of cells with wild‐type or mutant PKM2 3′‐UTRs and miRNA. The data represent the fold‐change in the expression (mean and standard error) of three replicates (P<0.05). (B) Western blot of AGO2 protein immunoprecipitated from cell extracts with an AGO2 antibody, or IgG. The amount of PKM2 bound to AGO2 or IgG was measured by qrt‐PCR in the presence of miR‐338 mimics or miR‐Scr (P<0.05). (C) Western blot of the effect of miR‐338 overexpression on PKM2 protein expression after cells were transfected with the PKM2 plasmid or plain vector. (D) Western blot of PKM2 expression 48 hours after cells were transfected with miR‐Scr/miR‐ 338 or with inhibitor‐NC/miR‐338 inhibitor. (E) Qrt‐PCR of PKM2 mRNA expression 48 hours after transfection (P<0.01).
Figure 3MiR‐338 expression inversely correlated with glioma malignancy and was restrained by CpG‐island methylation
(A) Gene Ontology function analysis and KEGG pathway enrichment of miR‐338‐downregulated genes. (B) The expression difference of miR‐338 between low‐grade and high‐grade gliomas in TCGA. (C) The methylation level of the miR‐338 promoter region between low‐grade and high‐grade gliomas in TCGA. (D) Qrt‐PCR of miR‐338 expression 48 hours after cells were treated with dimethyl sulfoxide or 5‐azacytidine (P<0.01 to 10nM 5aza, P<0.05 to 10nM 5aza). (E) Wound‐healing assay; the scratch was photographed at 0 h, 24 h and 48 h after transfection. (F) Cell viability was examined with a CCK‐8 assay at different time intervals after transfection (P<0.05, P<0.05, P<0.05, P<0.01, respectively). (G) Cellular ATP levels in SNB19 and LN229 glioma cell lines normalized with cell numbers 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post‐transfection with miR‐Scr or miR‐338 (P<0.01).
Figure 4MiR‐338 reduced the binding between PKM2 and β‐catenin to repress β‐catenin transcriptional activity
(A) Co‐IP assay to investigate the effect of miR‐338 on the binding between PKM2 and β‐catenin. (B) U87 and SNB19 cells were transiently transfected (24 h) with the pGL4.74 plasmid and co‐transfected with pGL4.75. Cells were then treated as indicated for 48 h. Both firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were calculated and recorded as fold‐induction (P<0.05, P<0.05). (C) Cell cycle analysis of miR‐Scr/miR‐338‐transfected cells treated with EGF, and overview of the cell cycle. (D) Immunostaining of β‐catenin location after miR‐Scr/miR‐338‐ transfected cells were treated with EGF.
Figure 5MiR‐338 inhibited tumor growth in vivo and prolonged the survival period
(A) Luminescence imaging for miR‐338‐ treated U87‐luc tumors versus miR‐Scr‐treated controls (P<0.01, P<0.01, P<0.05, respectively). Kaplan‐Meier survival curves indicating that outcomes were significantly better in mice transfected with miR‐338 than in mice transfected with miR‐Scr (P<0.01). (B) IHC staining revealed that PKM2 and β‐catenin protein levels were lower in the miR‐338‐treated group than in the miR‐Scr‐treated group.