Literature DB >> 28858256

New Antifeedant Grayanane Diterpenoids from the Flowers of Pieris formosa.

Chun-Huan Li1, Shi-Hong Luo2, Sheng-Hong Li3, Jin-Ming Gao4.   

Abstract

Three new grayanane diterpenoids, pierisoids C‒E (1-3), as well as 10 known ones (4-13), were evaluated from the flowers of Pieris formosa, which is used as an insecticide in rural areas of China. Their structures were elucidated on the basis of extensive 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopic data analyses. Significant antifeedant activity of 1, 3 and 10 against the beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) was found, indicating that these diterpenoids might also be involved in the plant defense against insect herbivores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ericaceae; Pieris formosa; antifeedant activity; grayanane diterpenoids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28858256      PMCID: PMC6151510          DOI: 10.3390/molecules22091431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


1. Introduction

Grayanoids represent a special type of diterpenoids, which have been limited to the plants of Ericaceae, such as the genera Pieris, Rhododendron, Kalmia, Craibiodendron and Leucothoe [1,2]. The grayanoid diterpenoids, as the characteristic secondary metabolites of the plants of Ericaceae, have attracted much attention from chemists and biologists not only for their intriguing structure but also for their diverse bioactivity, especially for their toxicity, as well as their analgesic, significant antifeedant, and insecticidal activity [3,4,5]. To date, 15 types of diterpenoid skeleton have been reported, including grayanane (A-nor-B-homo ent-kaurane) [5], 1,5-secograyanane [6], 3,4-secograyanane [7], 9,10-secograyanane [8], 1,10:2,3-disecograyanane [9], leucothane (A-homo-B-nor grayanane) [10], kalmane (B-homo-C-nor grayanane) [11], 1,5-secokalmane [12], micranthane (C-homo grayanane) [13], mollane (C-nor-D-homo grayanane) [14], rhodomollane (D-homo grayanane) [15], ent-kaurane, 4,5-seco-ent-kauran [16], pierisketane (A-homo-B-nor-ent-kaurane) [17], and rhodomollane [18]. All of these diterpenoid types are assumed to be derived biogenetically from the ent-kanrane skeleton. Notably, eight types of skeletons have been produced by the narrow genus Pieris, whose representative plant is Pieris formosa D. Don. (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Biogenetic relationships of grayanane carbon skeletons from the genus Pieris.

P. formosa, an evergreen shrub, is distributed mainly in the hilly regions and valleys of southern and southwestern China. The juice of both its fresh leaves and flowers are used as an insecticide and lotion for the treatment of ring worm and scabies, in folk medicine [19,20,21]. More than 60 grayanane diterpenoids with grayanane, 1,5-secograyanane, 3,4-seco-grayanane, 9,10-seco-grayanane, leucothane, 4,5-seco-ent-kauran, and pierisketane carbon skeletons have been isolated from the leaves, flowers, fruits, stems and roots of P. formosa [3,17,22,23,24,25]. In our previous work, two new highly esterified 3,4-seco-grayanane diterpenoids, pierisoids A and B, were reported from the flowers of P. formosa [20]. In our continuing endeavor to identify structurally unique and biologically diverse grayanoids from famous poisonous plants, three additional new grayanoids, pierisoids C‒E (1‒3) (Figure 2), together with ten known ones (4‒13) (Figure 2) were isolated from the flowers of P. formosa. Herein, the isolation and structural elucidation of 1‒3 and their antifeedant activity against the generalist plant-feeding cotton bollworm are described.
Figure 2

Structures of grayanane diterpenoids 1–13 isolated from P. formosa.

2. Results

2.1. Structural Elucidation of Compounds

Compound 1, = +14.3 (c = 0.2, MeOH), was isolated as colorless crystals. Its molecular formula was determined to be C25H40O9 according to its high-resolution (HR) ESI-MS (found: m/z 507.2567 [M + Na]+, calcd.: 507.2570) and 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra. IR absorptions at 3550, 3484, 1752 and 1729 cm−1 were indicative of hydroxyl and ester carbonyl functional groups. In the 1H-NMR spectrum (Table 1), four tertiary methyls at δH 0.91, 1.11, 1.27 and 1.41 (each 3H of singlet), one acetyl methyl at δH 2.10 (s, 3H), and one primary methyl at δH 1.11 (3H, t, J = 7.6 Hz) were clearly observed. Additionally, four singlets (δH 3.06, 3.39, 4.93 and 5.59), two triplets (δH 3.60 and 3.62, J = 5.0 Hz), and one doublet (δH 4.20, d, J = 5.4 Hz) were ascribable to either oxygenated methine or free hydroxyl groups. Other signals which were mostly overlapped centered between 1.58 and 2.85 ppm, resonating from either methine or methylene signals. The 13C-NMR spectrum revealed 25 carbon resonances, which were further classified by DEPT-90 and DEPT-135 spectra as six methyls, five methylenes, seven methines including four oxygenated ones (δC 72.4, 82.1, 82.5, and 85.0), seven quaternary carbons including three oxygenated ones (δC 78.4, 79.6, and 84.1), and two carbonyl carbonsC 170.3 and 173.4). By analysis of the HSQC spectral data, all proton signals, except for the two singlets at δH 3.06 and 3.39 and the doublet at δH 4.20, could be assigned unambiguously to their respective carbons, suggesting that the signals at δH 3.06, 3.39 and 4.20 were assignable to free hydroxyl groups. Moreover, the existence of a propionyloxy-group was determined from analysis of the 1H-1H COSY and HMBC spectra. The above spectroscopic evidence suggested a highly oxygenated grayanane diterpenoid for 1.
Table 1

1H- (400 MHz) and 13C- (100 MHz) NMR spectroscopic data of compounds 1–3 in acetone-d6 (δ (ppm), J (Hz)).

No.1 a2 b3
δHδCδHδCδHδC
12.74 dd (11.6, 5.2)50.9 d2.77 m50.9 d3.08 m52.6 d
2a 2b2.06 m2.27 m35.4 t2.05 m2.22 m35.9 t2.47 m2.73 dd (18.9, 11.8)32.8 t
33.60 t (5.0)82.5 d3.53 dd (1.5, 5.1)83.0 d 174.0 s
4 51.4 s 52.3 s 62.5 s
5 84.1 s 83.1 s 87.5 s
62.05 m (2H)34.0 t3.91 overlap78.2 d6.04 d (9.6)69.8 d
73.62 t (5.0)72.4 d3.41 overlap78.3 d5.23 d (9.7)68.7 d
8 54.5 s 53.8 s 56.1 s
92.08 m54.6 d2.08 m49.9 d2.32 m47.0 d
10 78.4 s 77.7 s 77.4 s
11a 11b1.58 m1.90 m21.8 t1.71 m1.81 m21.6 t1.98 m2.03 m21.1 t
12a 12b1.58 m2.23 m27.0 t1.68 m2.35 m28.1 t1.74 m2.08 m25.8 t
132.05 overlap52.9 d2.24 m47.6 d3.10 overlap46.4 d
145.59 s82.1 d5.52 s76.4 d6.43 s79.3 d
154.93 s85.0 d3.26 s68.6 d5.27 s86.2 d
16 79.6 s 61.3 s 88.4 s
171.27 s (3H)22.8 q1.45 s (3H)14.6 q1.55 s (3H)19.4 q
181.11 s (3H)18.5 q1.23 s (3H)19.3 q2.49 d (5.0)2.98 d (4.9)52.8 t
190.91 s (3H)23.0 q0.97 s (3H)23.2 q1.34 s (3H)17.4 q
201.41 s (3H)27.8 q1.41 s (3H)28.2 q1.51 s (3H)33.6 q
6-OAc 2.02 s (3H)20.6 q
169.4 s
7-OAc 2.10 s (3H)21.6 q
169.8 s
14-OPr1.11 t (3H, 7.6)2.85 m (2H)9.6 q 1.08 t (3H, 7.6)2.27 m (2H)9.5 q1.08 t (3H, 7.5)2.36 m (2H)9.1 q
28.4 t28.5 t28.2 t
173.4 s 173.8 s174.0 s
15-OAc2.10 s (3H)21.0 q 1.98 s (3H)20.8 q
170.3 s 171.6 s
16-OAc 1.98 s (3H)22.7 q
169.8 s

Hydroxyl groups of 1: δH 4.20 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 3-OH), 3.39 (s, 10-OH), 3.06 (s, 16-OH); Hydroxyl groups of 2: δH 3.91 (overlap, 3-OH), 3.64 (s, 5-OH), 3.51 (s, 10-OH), 3.41 (overlap, 6-OH), 3.34 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 7-OH).

Detailed analysis of the 1D (1H and 13C) and 2D (1H-1H COSY, HSQC, and HMBC) NMR spectra (Figures S1–S6 in supplementary data) of 1 revealed that its structure closely resembled that of asebotoxin VIII [19,26], a known grayanane diterpenoid previously isolated from both P. japonica and P. formosa. The obvious difference between the two compounds was that the acetoxy group located at C-6 in asebotoxin VIII migrated to C-15 in 1, as indicated by the HMBC correlations from H-15 (δH 4.93, s) to the acetoxy carbonyl group at δC 170.3 and from H2-6 (δH 2.05, m) to C-5 (δC 84.1) and C-7 (δC 72.4) (Figure 3a). In the ROESY spectrum, the correlations of H-15 with Me-18 as well as Me-20 suggested that H-15, Me-18, and Me-20 were all in the same β-orientation (Figure 3d). In addition, the correlations of 3-OH with Me-18, and of 15-H with 7-H and Me-17 suggested that 3-OH, H-7 and Me-17 were also in β-orientation (Figure 3d). Further analysis of the ROESY spectrum indicated the configurations of the remaining functional groups in 1 were the same as those in asebotoxin VIII, namely 3β, 5β, 7α, 10α, 16α-pentahydroxy, and 14β-propionyloxy. Accordingly, the structure of 1 was deduced as shown in Figure 2, and was named pierisoid C.
Figure 3

(a)–(c) are key HMBC correlations of pierisoids C–E, respectively; (d)–(f) are selected ROESY correlations of pierisoids C–E, respectively.

Compound 2 was obtained as colorless oil with a molecular formula of C23H36O8, as determined by a combination of HR-EI-MS and NMR spectra (including 1H, 13C, and DEPT) (Figures S7–S2 in supporting information). The resemblance of the NMR spectra of 2 (Table 1) with those of 1 disclosed that 2 was another grayanane diterpenoid structurally similar to 1. The major difference was the replacement of a methylene carbon in 1 by an oxygen-occurring methine in 2 (δC 78.2), suggesting that either C-6, or C-11, or C-12 of 2 was oxygenated. In the HMBC spectrum of 2, the HMBC correlations from 5-OH to the methine carbon at δC 78.2 indicated that this methine was ascribable to C-6 (Figure 3b). Carefully comparison of 13C-NMR spectral data of 2 with those of 1 (Table 1) obviously found that the upfield-shift of C-15 (δC 68.6) and C-16 (δC 61.3) in 2, indicated an oxygen bridge, was formed between C-15 and C-16; this was supported by the HR-EI-MS spectrum. In the ROESY spectrum of 2, the correlations of Me-17 with H-15; of 3-OH and 5-OH with Me-18; and of 5-OH with 6-OH and H-7 indicated that 3-OH, 5-OH, 6-OH, H-7, H-15, and Me-17 were in the same β-orientation (Figure 3e). Consequently, the structure of 2 was determined as shown in Figure 2 and was named pierisoid D. Compound 3, colorless crystals, has a molecular formula of C31H42O14, as determined by a combination of HR-EI-MS and NMR spectra (including 1H-, 13C-, and DEPT) (Figures S13–S18 in supplementary data). Its spectroscopic data were very similar to those of secorhodomollolide B, a 3,4-secograyanane diterpenoid also isolated from P. formosa [27]. The only difference between them was that the terminal double bond between C-4 (δC 146.0) and C-18 (δC 116.7) in secorhodomollolide B was replaced by a 4,18-oxirane group (δC 62.5 and 52.8) in 3, which was confirmed by the HMBC correlations from Me-19 (δH 1.34, s) to C-4, C-5 (δC 87.5) and C-18 (Figure 3c). Such an oxirane moiety has also been found in pierisoid A, another 3,4-secograyanane diterpenoid we reported from the flowers of P. formosa [20]. In the ROESY spectrum of 3, the correlations of Me-19 with H-1, and of Me-20 with H-7 indicated that Me-19 and H-1 were in α-orientation and Me-20 coupled with H-7 were in β-orientation (Figure 3f). Therefore, compound 3 was identified as shown in Figure 2 and was named pierisoid E. Ten known diterpenoids (Figure 2), namely, pierisformotoxin C (4) [24], secorhodomollolides C (5), D (6), and F (7) [28], asebotoxins I (8), II (12), IV (10), and VIII (11) [26,29], pieristoxin I (9) [29], and pierisformosin (13) [30] were also isolated from P. formosa and were identified by comparison of their spectroscopic data with those reported in the literature.

2.2. Antifeedant Activity of Compounds and

The antifeedant activity of 1, 3, 4 and 10 against the generalist insect herbivore, beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua), was assayed as previously described [31,32,33]. Compounds 1, 3 and 10 were found to be potential deterrents of the beet armyworm, with EC50 values of 10.91, 33.89 and 6.58 μg/cm2, respectively. It seems that the antifeedant activity of grayanane diterpenoids may be reduced with the increase of degree of esterification. Although less active than the commercial neem oil containing 1% azadirachtin (EC50 = 3.71 μg/cm2) (Table 2), the significant antifeedant activity of these individual compounds and the overall effect they might have suggest a defensive role of grayanane diterpenoids for P. formosa against insect herbivores.
Table 2

Antifeedant activity of compounds 1, 3, 4, and 10 against Spodoptera exigua.

CompoundMolecular Formulam/zEC50 (µg/cm2)
1 C25H40O948410.91
3 C31H42O1463833.89
4 C33H46O15682NA
10 C23H38O84426.58
Neem oil--3.71

NA = Not active; “-” = No (Because neem oil is a mixture).

3. Discussion

Compounds 1–3 are highly oxygenated grayanane diterpenoids, which occur extensively in the plants of Ericaceae and exhibit remarkable biological activities, such as antifeedant and insecticidal activities. Compound 2 is a grayanane-type diterpenoid with an unprecedented 15,16-epoxy group in the grayanoids family. Compound 3, a 3,4-seco-grayanane diterpenoid, possesses a 4,18-epoxy substituent, which is also unusual in nature. Compared to compounds 1 and 3, 10 displayed more significant antifeedant activity against S. exigua, which was possibly attributed to the integrity of the A ring.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General Experimental Procedures

Melting points were recorded on an Aisey YLD-6000 instrument and are uncorrected. Column chromatography was performed on 200–300 mesh silica gel (Qingdao Marine Chemical Factory, Qingdao, China). Optical rotations were measured on a Horiba-SEAP-300 spectropolarimeter (Horiba, Tokyo, Japan). UV spectral data were obtained on a Shimadzu-210A double-beam spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker-Tensor-27 spectrometer with KBr pellets (Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany). NMR experiments were carried out on either a Bruker AV-400 or a DRX-500 spectrometer with tetramethyl silane (TMS) as an internal standard (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). MS were recorded on a VG-Auto-Spec-3000 spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). TLC (Thin Layer Chromatography) spots were visualized under UV light, by dipping into 10% H2SO4 in EtOH followed by heating. All solvents including petroleum ether (60−90 °C) were distilled before use.

4.2. Plant Materials

The flowers of P. formosa were collected at Qu Jing, Yunnan province, China, in March 2008. The plant material was identified by Dr. Sheng-Hong Li.

4.3. Extraction and Isolation

Air-dried P. formosa flowers (3.5 kg) were powdered and extracted with MeOH (3 × 5 L) at room temperature. The extract was concentrated under reduced pressure and then partitioned between H2O and EtOAc (1:1). The organic layer (EtOAc part) was concentrated and the residue (594 g) was purified by silica gel column chromatography with solvent mixtures of CHCl3Me2CO (1:0, 9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 1:1 and 0:1) to afford six fractions. Fraction 2 (45.0 g, CHCl3Me2CO, 9:1) was repeatedly chromatographed on silica gel (CHCl3Me2CO, 10:1; petroleum etherMe2CO, 4:1), yielding subfractions A1−A3. Subfraction A1 (7.9 g) was further purified by silica gel column chromatography using petroleum ether-isopropanol (20:1), followed by purification on Sephadex LH-20 columns (CHCl3MeOH, 1:1) to obtain compounds 4 (6 mg), 5 (5 mg), and 7 (81 mg). Subfraction A2 (6.65 g) was repeatedly separated by silica gel column chromatography eluting with petroleum ether-acetone (6:1) and finally was purified by Sephadex LH-20 columns (CHCl3MeOH, 1:1; Me2CO) to afford compounds 1 (27 mg), 3 (3 mg), and 6 (6 mg). Subfraction A3 (10.2 g) was separated by silica gel column chromatography eluting with petroleum ether−ethyl acetate (5:1) and petroleum ether−isopropanol (12:1), respectively, and then similarly purified by Sephadex LH-20 columns (CHCl3MeOH, 1:1; Me2CO) to give 8 (78 mg) and 9 (7 mg). Fraction 3 (4.2 g, CHCl3Me2CO, 8:2) was separated on a MCI (Middle Chromatogram Isolated) gel column employing solvent mixtures of MeOH−water (6:4, 7:3, 8:2, 9:1, and 1:0), and the resulting subfractions 2 and 3 (7:3 and 8:2 MeOH−water, respectively) were repeatedly chromatographed on silica gel (CHCl3-EtOAc, 4:1; petroleum ether−isopropanol, 10:1) and Sephadex LH-20 (MeOH; Me2CO) columns to yield compounds 2 (18 mg), 10 (45 mg), 11 (8 mg), 12 (9 mg) and 13 (6 mg). Pierisoid C (1): Colorless crystals; mp 220–222 °C; = +14.3 (c = 0.2, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε): 209 (1.98), 193 (1.60) nm; IR (KBr) νmax: 3550, 3484, 2976, 2942, 1752, 1729, 1408, 1373, 1261, 1153, 1047 cm−1; ESI-MS: m/z 507 (50) [M + Na]+; HR-ESI-MS: m/z 507.2567 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C25H40O9Na, 507.2570); 1H- and 13C-NMR data: see Table 1. Pierisoid D (2): Colorless oils; = +16.7 (c = 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε): 202 (2.48) nm; IR (KBr) νmax: 3441, 3432, 2971, 2939, 1735, 1730, 1630, 1382, 1179, 1049, 1025 cm−1; ESI-MS: m/z 463 (88) [M + Na]+; HR-EI-MS: m/z 440.2420 (calcd. for C23H36O8, 430.2410); 1H- and 13C-NMR data: see Table 1. Pierisoid E (3): Colorless crystals; mp 271–272 °C; = +12.6 (c = 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε): 202 (2.29) nm; IR (KBr) νmax: 3441, 2942, 1787, 1734, 1631, 1372, 1264, 1237, 1053 cm-1; ESI-MS: m/z 661 (68) [M + Na]+; HR-EI-MS: m/z 638.2560 (calcd. for C31H42O14, 638.2575); 1H- and 13C-NMR data: see Table 1.

4.4. Antifeedant Activity

Beet armyworms (Spodoptera exigua) were purchased from the Pilot-Scale Base of Bio-Pesticides, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. A modified dual-choice bioassay was performed for an antifeedant test as previously described [20,31,32,33]. The larvae were reared on an artificial diet under a controlled photoperiod (light:dark, 12:8 h) and temperature (25 ± 2 °C). The larvae were starved for 3−4 h before each bioassay. Fresh leaf disks were cut from Brassica chinensis, using a cork borer (1.1 cm in diameter). The treated leaf disks were painted with 10 μL of the test compound in acetone, and control leaf disks were treated with the same amount of acetone. After air drying, the tested and control leaf disks were set in alternating position in the same Petri dish (90 mm in diameter), with moistened filter paper at the bottom. Two-thirds of the instars were placed at the center of the Petri dish. Five replicates were run for each treatment. After feeding for 24 h, the areas of leaf disks consumed were measured. The antifeedant index (AFI) was calculated according to the following formula: AFI = [(C − T)/(C + T)] × 100, where C and T represent the control and treated leaf areas consumed by the insect. The insect antifeedant potency of the test compound was evaluated in terms of the EC50 value, which was determined by probit analysis for each insect species.

5. Conclusions

Terpenoids play an important role in natural product chemistry and biology, such as antifungal and insecticidal activities [34]. Secondary metabolites, such as the grayanane diterpenoids that occur extensively in the plants of Ericaceae, are fascinating for their remarkable toxicity, as well as their significant antifeedant and insecticidal activity. In the current study, three new grayanane diterpenoids, pierisoids C–E (1‒3), as well as 10 known ones (4‒13), were identified from the flowers of P. formosa via their extensive 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopic data analyses. Notably, compounds 1, 3 and 10, especially 10, exhibited obvious antifeedant activity against the beet armyworm (S. exigua), suggesting that these diterpenoids were important defensive substances in P. formosa against natural enemies.
  23 in total

1.  Glandular trichomes of Leucosceptrum canum harbor defensive sesterterpenoids.

Authors:  Shi-Hong Luo; Qian Luo; Xue-Mei Niu; Ming-Jin Xie; Xu Zhao; Bernd Schneider; Jonathan Gershenzon; Sheng-Hong Li
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  New grayanol diterpenoid and new phenolic glucoside from the flowers of Pieris formosa.

Authors:  Wei-Guang Wang; Hong-Mei Li; Hai-Zhou Li; Zhao-Yuan Wu; Rong-Tao Li
Journal:  J Asian Nat Prod Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.569

3.  Mollolide A, a diterpenoid with a new 1,10:2,3-disecograyanane skeleton from the roots of Rhododendron molle.

Authors:  Yong Li; Yun-Bao Liu; Jian-Jun Zhang; Yu-Huan Li; Jian-Dong Jiang; Shi-Shan Yu; Shuang-Gang Ma; Jing Qu; Hai-Ning Lv
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 6.005

4.  Pierisketolide A and Pierisketones B and C, Three Diterpenes with an Unusual Carbon Skeleton from the Roots of Pieris formosa.

Authors:  Chang-Shan Niu; Yong Li; Yun-Bao Liu; Shuang-Gang Ma; Fei Liu; Li Li; Song Xu; Xiao-Jing Wang; Ru-Bing Wang; Jing Qu; Shi-Shan Yu
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 6.005

5.  Rhodomollanol A, a Highly Oxygenated Diterpenoid with a 5/7/5/5 Tetracyclic Carbon Skeleton from the Leaves of Rhododendron molle.

Authors:  Junfei Zhou; Guanqun Zhan; Hanqi Zhang; Qihua Zhang; Ying Li; Yongbo Xue; Guangmin Yao
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 6.005

6.  Peltate glandular trichomes of Colquhounia coccinea var. mollis harbor a new class of defensive sesterterpenoids.

Authors:  Chun-Huan Li; Shu-Xi Jing; Shi-Hong Luo; Wei Shi; Juan Hua; Yan Liu; Xiao-Nian Li; Bernd Schneider; Jonathan Gershenzon; Sheng-Hong Li
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 6.005

7.  Lyonin A, a new 9,10-Secograyanotoxin from Lyonia ovalifolia.

Authors:  Zhao-Yuan Wu; Hai-Zhou Li; Wei-Guang Wang; Hong-Mei Li; Rui Chen; Rong-Tao Li; Huai-Rong Luo
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  New 3,4-seco-Grayanane Diterpenoids from the Flowers of Pieris japonica.

Authors:  Lang Cao; Yanping Li; Hongmei Li; Dan Liu; Rongtao Li
Journal:  Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

9.  Three diterpene glucosides and a diphenylamine derivative from Pieris formosa.

Authors:  L Q Wang; G W Qin; S N Chen; C J Li
Journal:  Fitoterapia       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  Pierisformotoxins A-D, polyesterified grayanane diterpenoids from Pieris formosa and their cAMP-decreasing activities.

Authors:  Wei-Guang Wang; Zhao-Yuan Wu; Rui Chen; Hai-Zhou Li; Hong-Mei Li; Yuan-Dan Li; Rong-Tao Li; Huai-Rong Luo
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.408

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  An Overview of Biotransformation and Toxicity of Diterpenes.

Authors:  Ingrid P de Sousa; Maria V Sousa Teixeira; Niege A Jacometti Cardoso Furtado
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.411

2.  Antifeedant Effects of Essential Oil, Extracts, and Isolated Sesquiterpenes from Pilgerodendron uviferum (D. Don) Florin Heartwood on Red Clover Borer Hylastinus obscurus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).

Authors:  Javier Espinoza; Alejandro Urzúa; Leonardo Bardehle; Andrés Quiroz; Javier Echeverría; Marcia González-Teuber
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-05-27       Impact factor: 4.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.