Literature DB >> 28857756

Explicit and Implicit Stigma of Mental Illness as Predictors of the Recovery Attitudes of Assertive Community Treatment Practitioners.

Laura G Stull1, Haley McConnell1, John McGrew2, Michelle P Salyers2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While explicit negative stereotypes of mental illness are well established as barriers to recovery, implicit attitudes also may negatively impact outcomes. The current study is unique in its focus on both explicit and implicit stigma as predictors of recovery attitudes of mental health practitioners.
METHOD: Assertive Community Treatment practitioners (n = 154) from 55 teams completed online measures of stigma, recovery attitudes, and an Implicit Association Test (IAT).
RESULTS: Three of four explicit stigma variables (perceptions of blameworthiness, helplessness, and dangerousness) and all three implicit stigma variables were associated with lower recovery attitudes. In a multivariate, hierarchical model, however, implicit stigma did not explain additional variance in recovery attitudes. In the overall model, perceptions of dangerousness and implicitly associating mental illness with "bad" were significant individual predictors of lower recovery attitudes.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates a need for interventions to lower explicit stigma, particularly perceptions of dangerousness, to increase mental health providers' expectations for recovery. The extent to which implicit and explicit stigma differentially predict outcomes, including recovery attitudes, needs further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28857756      PMCID: PMC5918683     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci        ISSN: 0333-7308            Impact factor:   0.481


  24 in total

1.  Mental health consumers' experience of stigma.

Authors:  O F Wahl
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mental health case management over 20 years.

Authors:  S J Ziguras; G W Stuart
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  What is recovery? A conceptual model and explication.

Authors:  N Jacobson; D Greenley
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.

Authors:  Anthony G Greenwald; Brian A Nosek; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

5.  Can antistigma campaigns be improved? A test of the impact of biogenetic vs psychosocial causal explanations on implicit and explicit attitudes to schizophrenia.

Authors:  Tania M Lincoln; Elisabeth Arens; Cornelia Berger; Winfried Rief
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Measuring recovery orientation in a hospital setting.

Authors:  Michelle P Salyers; Jack Tsai; Timothy A Stultz
Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J       Date:  2007

7.  Fidelity and recovery-orientation in assertive community treatment.

Authors:  Sean A Kidd; Lindsey George; Maria O'Connell; John Sylvestre; Helen Kirkpatrick; Gina Browne; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2009-12-24

8.  The community's tolerance of the mentally ill.

Authors:  I F Brockington; P Hall; J Levings; C Murphy
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.319

9.  Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance.

Authors:  B G Link; J C Phelan; M Bresnahan; A Stueve; B A Pescosolido
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Stereotypes, stigma, and mental illness: learning from fieldwork experiences.

Authors:  M Lyons; J Ziviani
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec
View more
  1 in total

1.  An Instrument to Measure Mental Health Professionals' Beliefs and Attitudes towards Service Users' Rights.

Authors:  Francisco José Eiroa-Orosa; Laura Limiñana-Bravo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.