Literature DB >> 28857135

The future of robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery in Australia - A time and a place for everything.

James Nicklin1.   

Abstract

There has been a significant increase in minimally invasive surgery in gynaecology over the last 15 years, with approximately only one-third of hysterectomies for benign disease now performed via laparotomy. While robotic surgery offers considerable technical advantages over conventional laparoscopy and is associated with only a modest learning curve, the improvement in clinical outcomes is marginal and there are several disadvantages. There are increased set-up and operating times, the need to accommodate and maintain large sophisticated equipment, and the requirement for additional training. The preeminent issue regarding the place of robotic gynaecological surgery is cost. How this is addressed and contained will ultimately determine uptake in Australia. From the published literature to date, robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery is associated with marginal improvements in clinical outcomes for benign hysterectomy and endometrial cancer surgery, but little improvement for other benign gynaecological surgery or for cervical cancer surgery. Robotic surgery probably does improve clinical outcomes in obese and morbidly obese patients and is associated with improved ergonomics for the surgeon. It is likely that there will be continued substantial improvements in robotic surgical platforms into the foreseeable future and that robotic surgery will play an increasingly important role in gynaecological surgery in Australia.
© 2017 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gynaecology; review; robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28857135     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  3 in total

1.  Quality of life in patients who undergo conventional or robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Rodrigo Corvino Rodrigues; Meline Rossetto Kron Rodrigues; Noélle de Oliveira Freitas; Marilza Vieira Cunha Rudge; Silvana Andréa Molina Lima
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  A laparoscopic study investigating 3D vs 2D imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model with experts, non-experts, and students.

Authors:  Tibor Andrea Zwimpfer; Dominik Lacher; Bernhard Fellmann-Fischer; Michael Mueller
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Detailed cost of robotic-assisted surgery in the Australian public health sector: from implementation to a multi-specialty caseload.

Authors:  Kate McBride; Daniel Steffens; Christina Stanislaus; Michael Solomon; Teresa Anderson; Ruban Thanigasalam; Scott Leslie; Paul G Bannon
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.