Yongjin Yoo1, Jane Jung2, Yoo-Na Lee3, Youngha Lee1, Hyosuk Cho1, Eunjung Na2, JeaYeok Hong2, Eunjin Kim2, Jin Sook Lee4, Je Sang Lee5, Chansik Hong6, Sang-Yoon Park7, Jinhong Wie1,8, Kathryn Miller9, Natasha Shur9, Cheryl Clow9, Roseànne S Ebel10, Suzanne D DeBrosse10, Lindsay B Henderson11, Rebecca Willaert11, Christopher Castaldi12, Irina Tikhonova12, Kaya Bilgüvar12,13, Shrikant Mane12,13, Ki Joong Kim14, Yong Seung Hwang14, Seok-Geun Lee7, Insuk So1,8, Byung Chan Lim14, Hee-Jung Choi15, Jae Young Seong3, Yong Beom Shin5, Hosung Jung2, Jong-Hee Chae14, Murim Choi1,14. 1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Anatomy, Brain Research Institute, and Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Graduate School of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Department of Genome Medicine and Science, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea. 5. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Pusan, Republic of Korea. 6. Department of Physiology, Chosun University School of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea. 7. Department of Science in Korean Medicine, Cancer Preventive Material Developmental Research Center, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 8. Department of Physiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 9. Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY. 10. UH Cleveland Medical Center, Center for Human Genetics, Cleveland, OH. 11. GeneDx, 207 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD. 12. Yale Center for Genome Analysis, West Haven, CT. 13. Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 14. Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 15. Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University College of Natural Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Rett syndrome (RTT) and epileptic encephalopathy (EE) are devastating neurodevelopmental disorders with distinct diagnostic criteria. However, highly heterogeneous and overlapping clinical features often allocate patients into the boundary of the two conditions, complicating accurate diagnosis and appropriate medical interventions. Therefore, we investigated the specific molecular mechanism that allows an understanding of the pathogenesis and relationship of these two conditions. METHODS: We screened novel genetic factors from 34 RTT-like patients without MECP2 mutations, which account for ∼90% of RTT cases, by whole-exome sequencing. The biological function of the discovered variants was assessed in cell culture and Xenopus tropicalis models. RESULTS: We identified a recurring de novo variant in GABAB receptor R2 (GABBR2) that reduces the receptor function, whereas different GABBR2 variants in EE patients possess a more profound effect in reducing receptor activity and are more responsive to agonist rescue in an animal model. INTERPRETATION: GABBR2 is a genetic factor that determines RTT- or EE-like phenotype expression depending on the variant positions. GABBR2-mediated γ-aminobutyric acid signaling is a crucial factor in determining the severity and nature of neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Ann Neurol 2017;82:466-478.
OBJECTIVE:Rett syndrome (RTT) and epileptic encephalopathy (EE) are devastating neurodevelopmental disorders with distinct diagnostic criteria. However, highly heterogeneous and overlapping clinical features often allocate patients into the boundary of the two conditions, complicating accurate diagnosis and appropriate medical interventions. Therefore, we investigated the specific molecular mechanism that allows an understanding of the pathogenesis and relationship of these two conditions. METHODS: We screened novel genetic factors from 34 RTT-like patients without MECP2 mutations, which account for ∼90% of RTT cases, by whole-exome sequencing. The biological function of the discovered variants was assessed in cell culture and Xenopus tropicalis models. RESULTS: We identified a recurring de novo variant in GABAB receptor R2 (GABBR2) that reduces the receptor function, whereas different GABBR2 variants in EE patients possess a more profound effect in reducing receptor activity and are more responsive to agonist rescue in an animal model. INTERPRETATION:GABBR2 is a genetic factor that determines RTT- or EE-like phenotype expression depending on the variant positions. GABBR2-mediated γ-aminobutyric acid signaling is a crucial factor in determining the severity and nature of neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Ann Neurol 2017;82:466-478.
Authors: Thaise Nr Carneiro; Ana Cv Krepischi; Silvia S Costa; Israel Tojal da Silva; Angela M Vianna-Morgante; Renan Valieris; Suzana Am Ezquina; Debora R Bertola; Paulo A Otto; Carla Rosenberg Journal: Appl Clin Genet Date: 2018-08-22
Authors: Simranpreet Kaur; Nicole J Van Bergen; Kristen J Verhey; Cameron J Nowell; Breane Budaitis; Yang Yue; Carolyn Ellaway; Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Gerarda Cappuccio; Irene Bruno; Lia Boyle; Vincenzo Nigro; Annalaura Torella; Tony Roscioli; Mark J Cowley; Sean Massey; Rhea Sonawane; Matthew D Burton; Bitten Schonewolf-Greulich; Zeynep Tümer; Wendy K Chung; Wendy A Gold; John Christodoulou Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 4.878