| Literature DB >> 28856207 |
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of LIAISON® BRAHMS PCT® II GEN (DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy) in procalcitonin (PCT) determination by comparing it to the assay reference method B·R·A·H·M·S PCT KRYPTOR (Thermo Fisher Scientific Clinical Diagnostics, Hennigsdorf, Germany) and assessing its ability to discriminate between healthy subjects and patients with suspected infection.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic treatment; Automated diagnostic detection methods; Bacterial infections; PCT; Sepsis
Year: 2016 PMID: 28856207 PMCID: PMC5574861 DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2016.06.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pract Lab Med ISSN: 2352-5517
PCT concentrations cut-off reference values.
| 0.05 ng/mL | Healthy |
| <0.25–0.5 ng/mL | Systemic bacterial infection |
| 0.5 ng/mL | Local infection |
| >0.5 to >2 ng/mL | Sepsis and non-infectious conditions |
| ≥2 to ≤10 ng/mL | Severe sepsis |
| 10 ng/mL | Sepsis shock |
Such reference values must be considered together with individual patient's clinical conditions. Because PCT increase is associated with severity of systemic inflammatory response, low PCT values do not exclude for local bacterial infection, or viral infection. PCT levels can also be influenced by other non-infectious conditions such as severe trauma, autoimmune disorders, pancreatitis, renal dysfunction; hence reference ranges must be taken from current literature for specific condition or study population [adapted from [4], [5].
Main characteristics of assays BRAHMS PCT® KRYPTOR and LIAISON® BRAHMS PCT® II GEN.
| Sample volume | 50 μl | 100 μl |
| Time for the first result | 19 min | 16 min |
| Measuring range | 0.02–1000 ng/mL | 0.02–100 ng/mL |
| Calibration | 1 point | 2 point |
| Calibration stability | 7 days | 8 weeks |
| Integral on board stability | 14 days | 12 weeks |
| Functional assay sensitivity | 0.06 ng/mL | 0.04 ng/mL |
| LoD | 0.02 ng/mL | 0.02 ng/mL |
| Matrix | Serum/plasma | Serum/plasma |
Fig. 1BRAHMS PCT® KRYPTOR vs LIAISON® BRAHMS PCT® II GEN correlation (r=0.99).
Fig. 2(a) Bland-Altman plot comparing the two methods; and (b) mountain plot [25].
Comparison of the two PCT measuring methods using a cut off of 0.5 ng/mL.
| 101 | 1 | 102 | ||
| 2 | 89 | 91 | ||
| 103 | 90 | 193 | ||
Classification concordance between LIAISON® BRAHMS PCT® II GEN and B·R·A·H·M·S PCT® KRYPTOR.
| 98.1 (101/103) | 93.2–99.8 | |
| 98.9 (89/90) | 94–100 | |
| 98.4 (190/193) | 95.5–99.7 |
PCT measurement in healthy and hospitalized study patients prospectively analysed by LIAISON® BRAHMS PCT® II GEN indicating 95th and 97.5th centiles of the distribution.
| Healthy adults | 150 | <0.020 | <0.020 | <0.020 | 0 |
| Healthy children | 243 | <0.020 | 0.155 | 0.275 | 3 |
| Hospitalized adults | 161 | <0.020 | 0.054 | 0.088 | 2 |
Samples with PCT concentration >0.5 ng/mL re-tested using Vidas Brahms PCT®.
| Hospitalized 1 | 0.69 | 0.57 |
| Hospitalized 2 | 0.56 | 0.52 |
| Children 1 | 0.50 | 0.46 |
| Children 2 | 0.71 | 0.60 |
| Children 3 | 0.55 | 0.53 |