Literature DB >> 28855995

Combined detection of α-fetoprotein and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin in screening for trisomy 21 and management of cases in the moderate risk value range.

Yahong Li1, Xiaojuan Zhang1, Yun Sun1, Dongyang Hong1, Yanyun Wang1, Zhengfeng Xu1, Tao Jiang1.   

Abstract

Down syndrome is the most common cause of prenatal chromosomal abnormalities, and prenatal serum screening is an effective method for decreasing the birth prevalence of children with Down syndrome. The aim of the present study was to observe the effect of duplex screening and investigate the treatment of cases under specific conditions. The medians of free β-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and α-fetoprotein (AFP) were calculated and compared with those embedded in the 2T software. The detection and false-positive rates were analyzed under different conditions, and the distribution of Down syndrome cases was investigated in different risk ranges. Finally, suitable recommendations for further diagnostic investigation were provided according to the status of each individual. The medians of free β-HCG and AFP were found to differ from the corresponding medians embedded in the 2T software (P<0.01), and on the basis of a 5% false-positive rate, the detection rate would increase from 63.6 to 67.8% when compared with medians embedded in the 2T software, indicating we should establish our own medians of free β-HCG and AFP. In addition, residual cases (risk value <1/300) with relevant Down syndrome indications mainly concentrated at risk values between 1/1,000 and 1/300, and partial residual screening cases were verified through diverse methods. These findings indicated that different laboratories should establish their own medians; furthermore, what is classed as moderate risk is extremely important in screening for Down syndrome and reasonable recommendations may be offered under different conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Down syndrome; detection rate; false-positive rate; maternal serum screening; moderate risk; second trimester

Year:  2017        PMID: 28855995      PMCID: PMC5574156          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2017.1355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  18 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: current knowledge and novel insights.

Authors:  Stavros Sifakis; Nikos Papantoniou; Dimitra Kappou; Aris Antsaklis
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 1.901

2.  [Evaluation of Down's syndrome screening methods using maternal serum biochemistry in the second trimester pregnancy].

Authors:  Dong-yi Yu; Ping Fu; Zhan-hong Zhang; Fang Wang; Mei-yan Han; Hui-ying Ren; Wei Zhao; Kai Zhang; Shuo Li; Nan Jiang
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2011-06

3.  Correlation of midtrimester amniotic fluid cytokine concentrations with adverse pregnancy outcome in terms of spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, and preeclampsia.

Authors:  Christian Bamberg; Christina Fotopoulou; Daniela Thiem; Charles C Roehr; Joachim W Dudenhausen; Karim D Kalache
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2011-07-05

Review 4.  Maternal plasma biomarkers for down syndrome: present and future.

Authors:  N D Avent
Journal:  Drugs Today (Barc)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.245

5.  Validation of targeted sequencing of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for non-invasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y.

Authors:  K H Nicolaides; A Syngelaki; M Gil; V Atanasova; D Markova
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Second-trimester double or triple screening for Down syndrome: a comparison of Chinese and Caucasian populations.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Wang; Jun Luo; Ming-Wei Zhu; Lan-Nv Liu; Xu Ma
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  Confined placental mosaicism at chorionic villous sampling: risk factors and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Giulia Maria Baffero; Edgardo Somigliana; Francesca Crovetto; Alessio Paffoni; Nicola Persico; Silvana Guerneri; Faustina Lalatta; Roberto Fogliani; Luigi Fedele
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 8.  Noninvasive prenatal testing creates an opportunity for antenatal treatment of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Faycal Guedj; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  The association of triple-marker test results with adverse pregnancy outcomes in low-risk pregnancies with healthy newborns.

Authors:  N Cenk Sayin; M Tunç Canda; Nefize Ahmet; Sezer Arda; Necdet Süt; Füsun G Varol
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 10.  First- and second-trimester Down syndrome screening: current strategies and clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Sheng-Wen Shaw; Jenn-Jeih Hsu; Chien-Nan Lee; Ching-Hua Hsiao; Chih-Ping Chen; T'sang-T'ang Hsieh; Po-Jen Cheng
Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.705

View more
  1 in total

1.  Significance of data analysis in the quality control of prenatal screening for Down syndrome.

Authors:  Yahong Li; Xiaojuan Zhang; Dongyang Hong; Xianwei Guan; Shaolei Lv; Yun Sun; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2018-03-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.