Origin of the emergence of higher T c than bulk in iron chalcogenide thin films.

Fabrication of epitaxial FeSexTe1-x thin films using pulsed laser deposition (PLD) enables improving their superconducting transition temperature (T c) by more than ~40% than their bulk T c. Intriguingly, T c enhancement in FeSexTe1-x thin films has been observed on various substrates and with different Se content, x. To date, various mechanisms for T c enhancement have been reported, but they remain controversial in universally explaining the T c improvement in the FeSexTe1-x films. In this report, we demonstrate that the controversies over the mechanism of T c enhancement are due to the abnormal changes in the chalcogen ratio (Se:Te) during the film growth and that the previously reported T c enhancement in FeSe0.5Te0.5 thin films is caused by a remarkable increase of Se content. Although our FeSexTe1-x thin films were fabricated via PLD using a Fe0.94Se0.45Te0.55 target, the precisely measured composition indicates a Se-rich FeSexTe1-x (0.6 < x < 0.8) as ascertained through accurate compositional analysis by both wavelength dispersive spectroscopy (WDS) and Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS). We suggest that the origin of the abnormal composition change is the difference in the thermodynamic properties of ternary FeSexTe1-x, based on first principle calculations.

Introduction

Iron chalcogenide superconductors (FeSexTe1−x) have attracted considerable interest due to their enhanced superconducting critical transition temperatures (T c) in epitaxial FeSexTe1−x thin films fabricated by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) as compared to bulk FeSexTe1−x [1-10]. In the early stages, since bulk FeSexTe1−x (x = 0.5) has a maximum T c of about 15 K[2, 11], the growth and characterization of FeSe0.5Te0.5 thin films were pursued vigorously. Interestingly, enhanced T c values of 18–21 K have been consistently observed in most of the FeSe0.5Te0.5 thin films[3–6, 12]. In addition, this improved T c has been observed in FeSexTe1−x thin films with Se content x different from 0.5[9, 10, 13]. Thus, fabricating FeSexTe1−x thin films using PLD is advantageous for practical applications, owing to their enhanced T c. However, the origin and mechanism of the T c enhancement in FeSexTe1−x thin films remain controversial.

One contentious issue is why the T cs of FeSexTe1−x thin films are considerably enhanced by over 40% than bulk T c, regardless of the substrate and their composition. So far, diverse mechanisms have been proposed depending on the substrates and compositions used. In case of FeSe0.5Te0.5 thin films on LaAlO3 substrate, the origin of the enhanced T c was suggested to be the biaxial strain caused by the Volmer-Weber growth mode[4]. In FeSe0.5Te0.5 thin films on CaF2, the T c enhancement was attributed to the lattice contraction along all axes via the substitution of Se2− ions by F− ions at the interface[8, 9, 14]. Lately, several researchers have suggested that the suppression of phase separation causes improved T c of Se rich FeSexTe1−x thin films (0.6 ≤ x ≤ 0.8) on CaF2 substrate using superconducting phase diagrams of FeSexTe1−x thin films. These phase diagrams have been obtained by fabricating FeSexTe1−x thin films on CaF2 using FeSexTe1−x targets with different Se contents, and they indicate that T c increases with increasing Se content x, until x = 0.8[9, 10]. In spite of diverse mechanisms, each fails to explain how T c of FeSexTe1−x thin films is enhanced significantly than the bulk T c.

Interestingly, most of the lattice constants previously reported for FeSe0.5Te0.5 thin films with enhanced T c were found to be reduced along all axes compared to those of bulk FeSe0.5Te0.5, and these lattice constants are similar to the reported Se rich FeSexTe1−x thin films (0.6 ≤ x ≤ 0.8). We presume that the controversies with respect to the origin of the T c enhancement in FeSexTe1−x thin films are due to the compositional changes during their fabrication by PLD. To date, the composition of FeSexTe1−x thin films has been considered to be similar to that of the bulk targets used because not only is PLD considered an effective method for fabricating stoichiometric thin films, but also the measurement of the accurate composition of the fabricated films using a general method such as scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) is significantly difficult[9]. However, compositional variations in FeSexTe1−x thin films is reasonably possible as a result of the sensitivity of chalcogen and its compounds, considering the thermodynamic properties such as formation energy, melting point, and vapour pressure[6, 15–17]. In addition, if the composition of FeSexTe1−x is changed during the thin film growth, superconducting properties can be affected because the chalcogen ratio (Se:Te) and supersaturation of Fe significantly affect the superconducting properties of both FeSexTe1−x bulk and thin films[2, 9, 10, 18, 19]. Furthermore, changes in the chalcogen ratio (Se:Te) causes changes in the lattice constants of the material owing to the different atomic sizes of Se and Te. Thus, measuring the accurate composition of FeSexTe1−x thin films is crucial to understand the mechanism underlying superconductivity enhancement and to resolve controversies regarding the origin of the lattice contraction.

In this paper, we report that the enhanced T c and lattice contraction along all axes are caused by a remarkable increase in Se content x in FeSexTe1−x thin films. To confirm the lattice contraction along all the axes, we fabricated epitaxial FeSexTe1−x thin films on CaF2 substrate by PLD using a Fe0.94Se0.45Te0.55 target, and lattice contraction was confirmed by high-resolution X-ray diffraction (HR-XRD) and reciprocal space mapping (RSM). EDS is widely used to determine material compositions. However, accurate measurement of the composition presents significant difficulties such as low spectral resolution and peak overlap between the film and substrate. Therefore, we used wavelength dispersive spectroscopy (WDS) to accurately measure compositions of the films, and one of the WDS results was verified by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) because of its higher spectral resolution and quantification accuracy. The measured composition of our FeSexTe1−x thin films indicates a large increase in Se content (x) up to ~0.7, although these films were fabricated using the Fe0.94Se0.45Te0.55 target. The fabricated Se-rich FeSexTe1−x thin films (0.6 < x < 0.8) show enhanced T c than bulk samples, and the maximum onset superconducting transition temperature (T c,onset) of our samples is as high as 22 K. We believe that the remarkable increase in the Se content is closely related to the thermodynamic properties of FeSexTe1−x. Moreover, we also demonstrate a mutual relationship between the chalcogen ratio and superconducting properties.

Results and Discussion

In order to investigate the lattice contraction along all axes in FeSexTe1−x thin films, we have fabricated FeSexTe1−x films on CaF2 substrate at various growth temperatures, using a Fe0.94Se0.45Te0.55 target, and have analysed the structure and crystalline quality of the FeSexTe1−x films by four-circle X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis [Fig. 1]. Figure 1(a) shows out-of-plane θ–2θ scan of FeSexTe1−x thin films. Only FeSexTe1−x (00 l) reflections are observed along with the CaF2 substrate (00 l) reflections in all samples, indicating that the FeSexTe1−x thin films are well oriented along the c-axis. However, full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the FeSexTe1−x (001) rocking curve, which determines the crystalline quality and mosaic spread, is broader about 0.3 to 0.9 with decreasing growth temperature, as shown in Fig. 1(b). To verify the presence of secondary phases and to study the in-plane FeSexTe1−x structure in detail, additional θ–2θ scans were carried out using a two-dimensional XRD system and XRD in the acceleration laboratory. When an additional θ–2θ scan of a FeSexTe1−x film grown at 380 °C was carried out, only (00 l) reflections were observed without any in-plane structure or phase separation, indicating that the out-of-plane epitaxial arrangements are good (see Supplementary Fig. S1). Furthermore, the in-plane epitaxial arrangement and crystalline quality of FeSexTe1−x thin films were determined by the azimuthal ϕ scan of the off-axis FeSexTe1−x (112) reflection of the FeSexTe1−x thin film grown at 430 °C, as shown in Fig. 1(c). Since strong and sharp peaks appear at intervals of 90° without any extra peaks, it is confirmed that the FeSexTe1−x thin films have a good epitaxial arrangement in in-plane orientation without any misoriented grains. Thus, the fabricated FeSexTe1−x samples are high quality single-crystal-like materials without any secondary phases or phase separation. Figure 1(d) shows an enlarged section of Fig. 1(a) close to the (001) reflection of the FeSexTe1−x films. Interestingly, FeSexTe1−x (00 l) reflections are noticeably shifted to the right when compared with bulk FeSexTe1−x (00 l) reflections. Moreover, a slight shift in FeSexTe1−x (001) reflections to the right is observed with decreasing growth temperatures. Figure 1(e) shows the in-plane θ–2θ scan of FeSexTe1−x (101) reflection along with CaF2 (111) reflection. The (101) reflection of the FeSexTe1−x thin films is also shifted to the right compared to FeSexTe1−x bulk (101) reflection. A slight peak shift to the right is also observed for decreased growth temperatures. The peak shifts of both out-of-plane and in-plane to the right indicate that the lattice parameters of our FeSexTe1−x thin films are totally reduced compared to those of bulk samples.

Figure 1

Structural analysis of FeSexTe1−x thin films. (a) Out-of-plane θ–2θ scan of the FeSexTe1−x (FST) thin films grown at various temperature and (b) FWHM of the rocking curve on (001) reflection from FeSexTe1−x thin films. (c) Azimuthal ϕ scan of the off-axis (112) reflection from FeSexTe1−x thin films grown at 430 °C. For peak shift verification, (d) FeSexTe1−x (001) and (e) FeSexTe1−x (101) reflections are magnified. Dashed line indicates the peak positions of FeSexTe1−x bulk and thin films and the peak shift is marked in detail. The “artifact peak” means that the peak is originated by substrate holder glue in our XRD system.

To obtain precise lattice constants of FeSexTe1−x films, an RSM analysis was performed. Figure 2(a) shows RSM patterns around CaF2 (224) reflections for FeSexTe1−x thin films grown at 400, 430, and 460 °C. The calculated a and c lattice constant of FeSexTe1−x films vary with the growth temperature as: 3.748 Å and 5.867 Å for 400 °C, 3.750 Å and 5.882 Å for 430 °C, 3.755 Å and 5.907 Å for 460 °C. The lattice constants of FeSexTe1−x thin films are smaller than those of the bulk target which has lattice constants of a = 3.803 Å and c = 6.034 Å. Furthermore, Fig. 2(a) shows that the FeSexTe1−x thin films and CaF2 substrate have different in-plane positions, indicating that the FeSexTe1−x thin films have no strain effect from the lattice mismatch between the film and substrate. Based on the determined lattice constants, we calculated unit-cell volumes of FeSexTe1−x thin films. Figure 2(b) shows the dependence of the unit cell-volume of FeSexTe1−x on Se content x. The volumes of bulk FeSe, FeTe, and FeSexTe1−x (0.1 ≤ x ≤ 0.5) were calculated using previously reported lattice constants[1, 3, 10, 20]. Calculation of the volume of Se rich bulk FeSexTe1−x (0.6 ≤ x ≤ 0.9) was impossible because of the phase separation between two types of tetragonal phases in their structures[10, 11]. However, volumes of Se rich FeSexTe1−x (x ≥ 0.6) are inferred by a linear fitting because volumes of FeSexTe1−x increase linearly with increasing Se content x, when x is below 0.5[9, 10]. The calculated volumes of our FeSexTe1−x thin films increase with the growth temperatures as follows: 83.0 Å3 (400 °C), 83.7 Å3 (430 °C), 84.3 Å3 (460 °C). When these are plotted against a matching bulk volume position, our FeSexTe1−x films are found to be located in the region of Se rich FeSexTe1−x (0.6 < x < 0.8) although these films were fabricated by using a Fe0.94Se0.45Te0.55 target [Fig. 2(b)]. These results indicate that lattice contraction along all axes can be attributed to an abnormal increase in Se content.

Figure 2

RSM analysis and unit-cell volume of FeSexTe1−x thin films. (a) Maps showing X-ray diffraction intensities around (224) reflections of CaF2 and (204) reflection of FeSexTe1−x thin films grown at 400, 430, and 460 °C, respectively. With increasing growth temperature, (204) reflections are shifted to lower right. This means that a and c lattice constants gradually increase as the growth temperature increases, (b) Unit-cell volumes of FeSexTe1−x were calculated using lattice constants of bulk FeSexTe1−x (solid) from a previous report and lattice constants of thin films (open) were obtained from the RSM data.

SEM/EDS has been widely used for quantitative composition analysis. However, due to the low peak resolution of EDS hinders an accurate quantitative analysis. In fact, the limitation of accurate compositional analysis by EDS in FeSexTe1−x thin films on CaF2 because of the overlap between the energy peaks of K edge of Ca and L edge of Te has been reported[9], which was also confirmed in our samples (see Supplementary Fig. S2). Thus, we performed WDS scan to confirm the correct composition of FeSexTe1−x thin films. Using WDS, the measured Se content x in FeSexTe1−x thin films are 0.731, 0.717, 0.665, and 0.633 for growth temperatures of 380, 400, 430, and 460 °C, respectively [Fig. 3]. These results indicate the significantly increased Se content x in FeSexTe1−x thin films as compared to the target composition and a slight loss of Se depending on the growth temperature. However, in the FeSexTe1−x thin films deposited below 400 °C, the Se content fluctuated between 0.7 and 0.73, unlike the conventional tendency of samples deposited at 400 °C (see Supplementary Fig. S3). To verify the WDS results, the composition of a FeSexTe1−x thin film grown at 380 °C was measured by RBS (see Supplementary Fig. S4), and the composition measured by RBS, Fe0.98Se0.71Te0.29 agrees well with that measured by WDS, within the error margin. Additionally, the composition of the Fe0.94Se0.45Te0.55 bulk target measured by WDS, was found to be Fe0.97Se0.39Te0.61. The difference between the measured and nominal composition of the target might be due to the high volatility of Se at high temperatures used during the fabrication of the target. Thus, the measured composition of FeSexTe1−x thin films shows a striking increase in the Se content, and this result agrees well with the observation of reduced volumes and lattice contraction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the observation of abnormal composition changes in FeSexTe1−x thin films grown by PLD.

Figure 3

Composition analysis of FeSexTe1−x thin films. The WDS results of FeySexTe1−x thin films show the increased Se content compared to the Fe0.94Se0.45Te0.55 target used. With increasing growth temperature, Se content x decreases and Fe content y (inset figure) increases. Each composition measured by WDS has a standard deviation below 2% and the RBS data (circle symbol) has a standard error of ± 1% (Fe), ± 0.5% (Se) and ± 0.5% (Te).

Significantly, the main phenomenon in the abnormal composition change in FeSexTe1−x thin film is the change in the chalcogen ratio (Se:Te) [Fig. S5(a)], and not the loss of chalcogens [Fig. S5(b)] (see Supplementary Fig. S5). Loss of volatile components is commonly speculated during the growth of thin films on heated substrates under high vacuum, as depicted in Fig. S5(b). However, because not only the chalcogen loss is relatively small compared to the remarkable increase in Se content x but also the overall stoichiometry of our FeSexTe1−x thin films was almost maintained, the composition change is attributed to the formation of a plume when the target is irradiated with the excimer laser. In general, the plume transfers the target substances stoichiometrically to the substrate, in the PLD system. However, when a mixed target containing various substances is used, a distinction between energetic species of plume can occur, owing to the differences in the formation energy of each substance. For instance, when the Sn(Se, Te) target mixed as SnSe and SnTe = 1:1 was ablated by an excimer laser, SnTe fully dissociated and ionized during laser ablation, whereas SnSe partially vaporized congruently with ionization during ablation, because SnSe has a relatively low formation energy[21, 22]. This implies that SnSe which has a relatively stronger bond is capable of getting transferred through the plume from the target to the substrate, without dissociation. Hence, a change in composition during film growth in PLD system is most probable in a mixed material in which the components have different formation energies.

Interestingly, FeSexTe1−x can also be regarded as a mixed structure comprised of five types of structures and bonds, such as FeSe, FeTe, and FeSe0.5Te0.5 (see Supplementary Fig. S6), and each type of structure has a different thermodynamic property. In particular, Se rich FeSexTe1−x has shown phase separation between FeSe and FeSexTe1−x phases[10, 11]. This suggests that the separated phase is more thermodynamically stable than the single phase of Se rich FeSexTe1−x. To compare the formation energy correctly, we have calculated the formation energies of PbO-type FeSe (α-FeSe), α-FeSe0.5Te0.5, and α-FeTe. The formation energies calculated by first principle are −3.392, −3.179, and −3.020 eV for α-FeSe, α-FeSe0.5Te0.5, and α-FeTe, respectively (see Supplementary S8 and, Tables S1 and S2). Since α-FeSe has relatively low formation energy, α-FeSe has stronger binding than α-FeTe or α-FeSe0.5Te0.5, indicating that Fe has a higher tendency to combine with Se than with Te. This indicates the high possibility of increasing Fe to Se ratio in the FeSexTe1−x thin films because FeSe binding is relatively more stable in the plume when the FeSexTe1−x target is irradiated by laser.

Although FeSe binding is relatively stable, both a slight decrease in Se content x and a slight increase in Fe content have been observed with increasing growth temperatures in FeSexTe1−x thin films [Fig. 3]. The high volatility of Se is one possible reason. When a material containing a high volatile component is deposited by PLD under the high vacuum condition, a loss of the volatile substance is possible[23, 24]. Thus, Se loss is expected because Se has lower melting point and higher vapour pressure than Te and Fe[15]. Additionally, we assume that the driving force for the phase transition of FeSe is one other reason for Se loss. FeSe undergoes a phase transition from PbO-type tetragonal structure to NiAs hexagonal structure (β) close to 450 °C in bulk system[16]. Interestingly, our growth temperature is close to 450 °C, where a phase transition is observed. When we calculated the formation energy of β-FeSe, we obtained a value higher than that of α-FeSexTe1−x. This means β-FeSe has a relatively weaker bonding than α-FeSexTe1−x. Thus, we presume that the Fe-Se bonding may be relatively unstable when the FeSexTe1−x thin film is deposited on a heated CaF2 substrate when the growth temperature approaches 450 °C. However, since the formation energy is calculated assuming a state of vacuum and 0 K, there is a limitation in representing the formation energy at a given temperature.

To verify whether T c of our FeSexTe1−x thin films is indeed improved by the increase in Se content x, the temperature dependent resistivity (ρ(T)) was measured using a four-point probe method. Figure 4(a,b) show the dependence of the resistivity of FeSexTe1−x thin films on the growth temperature. Our Se rich FeSexTe1−x thin films (0.6 ≤ x ≤ 0.8) have reasonable T c as compared to those reported in literature[4–6, 9, 10]. The maximum T c,onset and zero resistance (T c,zero) are 22.0 K and 20.4 K, respectively, for the Fe1.05Se0.72Te0.28 films grown at 400 °C. At growth temperatures higher than 400 °C, T c,onset value decreases: 18.8 K (430 °C) and 17.4 K (460 °C) [Fig. 4(b)]. When FeSexTe1−x films were fabricated at ≤ 400 °C, the T c,onset of FeSexTe1−x remained over 20 K, whereas T c,zero randomly deteriorated to 18.2, 20.2, and 20.4 K (see Supplementary S7, Fig. S7). Interestingly, T c increases with increasing Se content x in spite of the degrading crystalline quality, according to FWHM [Fig. 1(b)]. This means that the chalcogen ratio has a more significant effect on the superconducting properties than crystalline quality. Even though T c of the FeSexTe1−x films is more strongly associated with chalcogen ratio than the crystalline quality, the latter too affects T c,zero and superconducting transition. When the growth temperature is decreased below 400 °C, the crystalline quality of FeSexTe1−x thin films deteriorated, whereas Se content x of the FeSexTe1−x films remains almost 0.7, within the error margin [Fig. 1(b) and Supplementary Fig. S3]. These FeSexTe1−x films show similar T c,onset values of over ~20 K. However, when the crystalline quality is poor, the deterioration of T c,zero with T c tailing is observed [Fig. S7]. Thus, it is important to fabricate highly crystalline films with the remaining Se content x of over 0.7 in FeSexTe1−x thin films. Additionally, since Fe content increased with increasing growth temperature, the effect of excess Fe is considered. Generally, excess Fe degrades T c of FeSexTe1−x, and this effect of excess Fe is confirmed using temperature dependence of resistivity or specific heat[18]. If the excess Fe degrades the T c of FeSexTe1−x, the resistivity increases as the temperature decreases to the point where the superconducting transition occurs. However, as shown in Fig. 4(a), the resistivity decreases with decreasing temperature, showing metallic behaviour. Thus, even if the content of Fe increases with increasing growth temperature, the effect of excess Fe on the superconductivity of FeSexTe1−x thin films is negligible because temperature dependence of resistivity of our FeSexTe1−x thin films shows a tendency when there is no excess Fe.

Figure 4

Superconducting properties of FeSexTe1−x thin films for different growth temperatures (T g). Temperature dependence of (a) the resistivity from room temperature to below T c and (b) the superconducting transition of FeSexTe1−x thin films, (c) Magnetic field dependence of magnetization J c in FeSexTe1−x thin films at 4.2 K, and (d) J c and T c as a function of growth temperatures.

Figure 4(c) shows magnetization J c as a function of the magnetic field for all films measured by a vibrating sample magnetometer in fields up to 14 T. FeSexTe1−x thin film grown at 400 °C shows a reliable J c of 2.23 MA/cm2 in self-field when compared to the magnetization of FeSexTe1−x thin films on yttria-stabilized zirconia substrate[19]. Figure 4(d) shows the relationship between T c and J c as a function of the growth temperature and J c shows a characteristic similar to T c, zero. This implies that J c is also influenced by chalcogen ratio along with the crystalline quality of FeSexTe1−x thin films.

The enhancement of T c in Se rich FeSexTe1−x thin films is closely related to the structural factors such as anion height, Ch-Fe-Ch bond angle (where Ch = chalcogen), and the suppression of phase separation[9, 10, 25, 26]. Among various factors, we first focused on anion height because the anion height of FeSexTe1−x gradually approaches 1.38 Å as the Se content x increases[9, 25]. As the Se content x increases from 0.1 to 0.5, T c of FeSexTe1−x increases. When Se content x is increased from 0.5 to 0.9, the T c of FeSexTe1−x is decreased in bulk due to the phase separation. However, T c of Se rich FeSexTe1−x was enhanced when phase separation was prevented by the fabrication of thin films by PLD[9, 10]. Since our FeSexTe1−x thin films with enhanced T c show Se rich FeSexTe1−x composition and the samples are highly epitaxial without phase separation, the enhanced T c can also be explained by the anion height and suppression of phase separation. Secondly, we focused on bond angle of Fe and Chalcogen[18]. Bellingeri et al. insisted that reduced in-plane lattice contraction cause the reduced bond angle which approach to ideal value as 109.47° with enhancement of T c [4]. Since the our Se rich FeSexTe1−x thin films show the reduced in-plane lattice constant similar to reported lattice constant of FeSe0.5Te0.5, the increased Se content x sufficiently enhances the T c of FeSexTe1−x thin films. As a results, the increase of the Se content x is a significantly important factor for improving the T c in the FeSexTe1−x thin film because the anion height and bond angle become closer to the ideal values as the ratio of Se increases.

Based on the measured composition of FeSexTe1−x thin films, we present a phase diagram for FeSexTe1−x as a function of Se content x [Fig. 5]. As shown in Fig. 5, T c of the reported bulk FeSexTe1−x shows a dome-like tendency depending on the chalcogen ratio, and the reported T c of FeSe0.5Te0.5 films is significantly improved over the bulk T c. However, since the compositions of the reported FeSe0.5Te0.5 thin films were based on the bulk target composition, the actual composition of these thin films may be different depending on each experimental condition. In addition, when data from our FeSexTe1−x1−x thin films with the actual measured composition were plotted on the phase diagram, we confirm that T c of FeSexTe1−x thin films increases significantly as Se content x increases, contrary to that observed in FeSexTe1−x bulk. In general, T c of FeSexTe1−x generally deteriorated when Se content x is over 0.8, and diverse origins have been speculated, including phase transition[9, 26–29]. However, we believe that it is possible to obtain a more elevated T c for FeSexTe1−x when x is increased to more than 0.8 because FeSe has shown high T c in monolayers[30] and also under high pressures[31].

Figure 5

Phase diagram of T c as a function of Se content, x. The open squares[35] and up-triangles[11] represent T c of bulk samples from previously reported data. Circles indicate T c,onset (solid) and T c,zero (open) of FeSexTe1−x films fabricated from a Fe0.94Se0.45Te0.55 target (circle with cross). The FeSexTe1−x sample grown at 380 °C was excluded from the phase diagram due to selenium ratio fluctuations (see Supplementary Fig. S3). T c of the Fe0.94Se0.45Te0.55 target (14.6 K) is plotted on the phase diagram based on the measured composition (Fe0.97Se0.39Te0.61). Other solid symbols show reported T c values of FeSexTe1−x thin films from published reports in which the compositions were assumed to be same as the nominal target compositions[4, 9–12].

Conclusion

We have demonstrated that the remarkable increase in Se content x in FeSexTe1−x thin films is one of the most critical parameters for enhancing the superconductivity of FeSexTe1−x thin films fabricated by PLD. Although our FeSexTe1−x thin films were fabricated using a Fe0.94Se0.45Te0.55 target, the composition of the FeSexTe1−x thin films were not equivalent to that of the target. A Se rich FeSexTe1−x (0.6 < x < 0.8) composition was confirmed by the accurate WDS and RBS analyses. Although our FeSexTe1−x thin films have a Se rich FeSexTe1−x phase, which generally shows phase separation, our thin films were found to consist of a single phase. The abnormal change in the chalcogen ratio (Se:Te) is due to the preference of Fe to bond with Se because of the low formation energy. In addition, a slight decrease in Se content x with increasing growth temperatures was observed in FeSexTe1−x thin films, although the loss in Se is relatively small compared to the gain in the chalcogen ratio. However, there may be other unidentified factors affecting the composition change, because the mechanism of thin film growth in a PLD system is complicated and to the best of our knowledge, there have been no experimental reports on the abnormal change in the chalcogen ratio. Further research is required to completely understand the underlying causes of this change and hence to measure the correct compositions of the FeSexTe1−x thin films through more accurate measurements. We believe that these results provide the most satisfactory resolution to the controversial issues concerning the optimized chalcogen ratio and the mechanism of T c enhancement in FeSex Te1−x thin films. Furthermore, changes in chalcogen ratios in thin films should be an important consideration in the growth and study of various complex chalcogenide compounds.

Materials and Method

FeSexTe1−x thin films were fabricated on (001)-oriented CaF2 substrate at different growth temperatures, which is the temperature applied to the substrate, ranging from 380 to 460 °C by PLD with KrF (248 nm) excimer laser (Coherent, COMPEX PRO 205 F) in vacuum with a base pressure of 2 × 10−5 Pa. The energy density of the focused laser beam, the repetition, and distance between the target and substrate are 3 J/cm2, 3 Hz and 4 cm, respectively. Fe0.94Se0.45Te0.55 targets used were prepared by an induction melting method. For structural analysis, we used a four-circle XRD (PANalytical, X’Pert pro), 2D detector XRD system (Bruker, D8 Discover with a Vantec 2D detector), and six-circle XRD for RSM (Bruker, D8 ADVANCE) using Cu-Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å), and XRD in acceleration (Pohang accelerator laboratory, 3 A beamline, λ = 1.148 Å). The composition of the films was measured by WDS (CAMECA SX51 located in UW-Madison) and calculated as an average of at least 15 scattered points on each sample. The RBS data was obtained by the Accelerator Techniques Group in EAG Laboratories and the used He++ ion beam energy and normal detector angle are 2.275 MeV and 160°, respectively. Formation energies were calculated via density functional theory (DFT) calculations as implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) 5.2.2 code[32-34]. The normal state and critical temperature resistivity measurements were carried out in a cryostat cooled by a closed cycle refrigerator using a four-point probe method. T c,onset describes the temperature where the resistivity reaches 90% of the normal resistivity above transition. To measure magnetization J , we used a 14 T oxford vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) by applying the magnetic field perpendicular to the surface of the films at 4.2 K. Through Bean’s model, the magnetic moment was converted to J c according to the equation, J  = 15∆m/(V*r), where, ∆m, V, and r are the magnetic moment, volume, and radius.

supplementary information