Olumide Bolarinwa Ayodele1. 1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, 32610, Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia. ayodele_olumide@yahoo.com.
Abstract
Achieving high degree of active metal dispersions at the highest possible metal loading and high reducibility of the metal remains a challenge in Fischer Tropsch synthesis (FTS) as well as in hydrogeoxygenation (HDO).This study therefore reports the influence of oxalic acid (OxA) functionalization on the metal dispersion, reducibility and activity of Co supported ZSM-5 catalyst in FTS and HDO of oleic acid into paraffin biofuel. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) results showed that cobalt oxalate supported ZSM-5 catalyst (CoOx/ZSM-5) synthesized from the incorporation of freshly prepared cobalt oxalate complex into ZSM-5 displayed increase in surface area, pore volume and average pore size while the nonfunctionalized cobalt supported on ZSM-5 (Co/ZSM-5) catalyst showed reduction in those properties. Furthermore, both XRD and XPS confirmed the presence of Co° formed from the decomposition of CoOx during calcination of CoOx/ZSM-5 under inert atmosphere. The HRTEM showed that Co species average particle sizes were smaller in CoOx/ZSM-5 than in Co/ZSM-5, and in addition, CoOx/ZSM-5 shows a clear higher degree of active metal dispersion. The FTS result showed that at CO conversion over Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 catalysts were 74.28% and 94.23% and their selectivity to C5+ HC production were 63.15% and 75.4%, respectively at 4 h TOS. The HDO result also showed that the CoOx/ZSM-5 has higher OA conversion of 92% compared to 59% over Co/ZSM-5. In addition CoOx/ZSM-5 showed higher HDO and isomerization activities compared to Co/ZSM-5.
Achieving high degree of active metal dispersions at the highest possible metal loading and high reducibility of themetal remains a challenge in Fischer Tropsch synthesis (FTS) as well as in hydrogeoxygenation (HDO).This study therefore reports the influence of oxalic acid (OxA) functionalization on the metal dispersion, reducibility and activity of Co supported ZSM-5catalyst in FTS and HDO of oleic acid into paraffin biofuel. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) results showed that cobalt oxalate supported ZSM-5catalyst (CoOx/ZSM-5) synthesized from the incorporation of freshly prepared cobalt oxalatecomplex into ZSM-5 displayed increase in surface area, pore volume and average pore size while the nonfunctionalized cobalt supported on ZSM-5 (Co/ZSM-5) catalyst showed reduction in those properties. Furthermore, both XRD and XPS confirmed the presence of Co° formed from the decomposition of CoOx during calcination of CoOx/ZSM-5 under inert atmosphere. The HRTEM showed that Co species average particle sizes were smaller in CoOx/ZSM-5 than in Co/ZSM-5, and in addition, CoOx/ZSM-5 shows a clear higher degree of active metal dispersion. TheFTS result showed that at COconversion over Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5catalysts were 74.28% and 94.23% and their selectivity to C5+ HC production were 63.15% and 75.4%, respectively at 4 h TOS. The HDO result also showed that theCoOx/ZSM-5 has higher OAconversion of 92% compared to 59% over Co/ZSM-5. In addition CoOx/ZSM-5 showed higher HDO and isomerization activities compared to Co/ZSM-5.
The depletion of fossil fuel reserves coupled with the attendant environmental pollution from its combustion as well as the recent fall in thecrude oil prices globally have generated intensified research into alternative source of energy especially for the transport sector[1, 2]. In all the research areas, the search for sustainable feed stocks and processing techniques seems to be at the fore front[1, 3]. A sustainable feed stock should be renewable and not conflict with the source of food for the populace especially for the low income dwellers in therural areas of third and developing countries. On the other hand, a sustainable processing technique should maximize profit, minimize waste and have a high turnover and throughput. The two categories of sustainable and renewable energy sources (SRES) are carbon source such as biodiesel, bioethanol, biofuel etc., and the non-carbon source such as wind energy, solar energy and geothermal. However, it appeared global attention is focused more on carbon sources due to the abundance of biomass. For example, several researchers have extensively studied different types of biomass as potentialfeed stock for renewable energy under different technologies such as torrefaction, hydrothermal liquefaction, gasification, fast pyrolysis, Co-combustion of renewable biomass and carbonization of solid fuels from lignocellulosic biomass[4-8]. Amongst the products of all these thermochemicalconversion technologies, syngas and biooil appears to be of greatest interest. For example, syngas is a basic raw material for chemical industry and transportation fuel with energy density of about 50% of natural gas[5]. On the other hand, biooil which contains severaloxygenated groups and fatty acidscan be upgraded to wide range of transportation fuels via removal of theoxygen molecules which lowers its overall energy density by about 9–13% compared to conventional diesel fuels[9]. So far, two processing techniques have been studied and reported in the literature for the removal of oxygen molecules from biooil, which are hydrodeoxygenation (HDO, removal of O2 as H2O) and decarboxylation (removal of O2 as CO2) or decarbonylation (removal of O2 as CO).In both of these processes, i.e. conversion of biomass to syngas and biooil, certain well designed catalysts are required to produce the finalhydrocarbon fuel products that are beneficial to mankind at reasonable process conditions with economical yield. Amongst the well-studied catalyst active metals (and promoters), Ni, Co, Fe, Pd, Pt, Cu, Zr, Ru and Mo have showed varying degree of promising results for both the syngas conversion to higher hydrocarbon fuel in what is referred to as Fischer Tropsch synthesis (FTS), and biooil upgrading to (normal and isomerized paraffinic) hydrocarbon fuels. However, the high cost of Ru, Pd, Pt and sometimes Zr has precluded their application from industrial scale, thus constraining their studies to laboratory or bench scale studies, for example Pd is about 1000 times more expensive than Ni[10]. According to literature survey on FTS[11-14], Co appears to be preferably studied compared to Fe due to its high selectivity to linear paraffin fractions, slow deactivation, less oxygenates and low water–gas shift (WGS) activity. In these studies, metal-support-interaction (MSI) receives considerable attention since it has strong bearing on theCo dispersion on the surface of the support and theCo-oxide reducibility. Xiong et al.[11] specifically reported that high dispersion of active Co on the surface of support requires some interaction between Co species and the support, and the existence of such interaction is needed to stabilize thecatalyst against aggregation of active Co and deactivation under FTSconditions. They concluded that strong MSI decreases both the reducibility and activity of cobaltcatalyst under FTS reaction conditions. Similarly, previous studies on thecatalytic upgrading of fatty acids and biooil into biofuels either through the HDO or decarboxylation/decarbonylation (Decarbs) routes also showed that Co is essentially a promising active metal. For example, Wu et al.[15] reported decarboxylation of stearic acid over a series of synthesized 20% Ni/Al2O3, 20% Cu/ZrO2, 20% Co/ZrO2 and 20% Ni/ZrO2. In the report, 20% Co/ZrO2 showed about two times stearic acidconversion compared to other catalysts, although its selectivity to the expected product – heptadecane – was low. Another study[16] compares theconversion of guaiacol and product yields over Al-MCM-41 supported Ni, Co, and Ni–Cocatalysts at the same experimentalconditions and 10Co/Al-MCM-41 exhibited the highest HDO activity with least tendency towards gas phase yields for CH4, CO and CO2. In these studies, thechallenges to catalyst designs and activities in upgrading fatty acids/biooil to transportation hydrocarbon fuels are similar to what were reported for theFTS which are active metal dispersion, active metal reducibility and proper MSI.To solve this problem, different studies such as effects of support, promoters, cobalt precursor and synthesis conditions have been explored[11, 13, 14, 17, 18]. In a study on the effect of support, acidic HZSMzeolite appears to be more prospective than alumina due to the propensity of formation of cobalt aluminate which is very difficult to reduce, in addition, HZSMzeolite enhanced the selectivity of theFTS towards gasoline[12]. Some earlier reports[19, 20] also established that acidiczeolite as a catalyst support or in combination with some other conventional support enhanced selectivity to gasoline range fuel. Co supported on TiO2also showed similar observation to thecobalt aluminate forming cobalt titanates with high Co dispersions but strong Co–support interaction leading to poor Co-oxides reducibility. On thecontrary, Co supported on SiO2 showed a weaker MSI which favors the reducibility of thecobalt oxides however, theCo agglomerates after calcination process leading to a low dispersion of theCo° particles on theSiO2 surface[20]. Consequently, the final surface density of active Co° sites will be a function of degree of cobalt dispersion and reducibility. Report on the effect of promoters such as Ru showed that small amount of Ru promoter to Co/SBA-15 shifted the reduction temperature of Co3O4 → CoO and CoO → Co to lower temperatures and suppressed the formation of Co3+ species[11]. Another study on the influence of cobalt loading (10–40 wt% Co) and effect of Co precursor using Co nitrate, Co acetate and Co acetylacetonate[20] showed that while using Co nitrate, increase in theCo loading resulted into decrease in the degree of dispersion but increase in the extent of cobalt reduction. Their best observed Co loading for COconversion was 30%. On the influence of type of precursors, they found that Cocatalysts prepared from both acetate and acetylacetonate precursors have higher degree of Co dispersion and a stronger cobalt–support interaction leading to the formation of low reducible cobalt silicatescompared to that derived from cobalt (II) nitrate according to their TEM, XPS, and TPR. From all the literature studied, it appeared that high degree of active metal dispersions at the highest possible Co loading and high reducibility of the active species are the most significant factors that affect both COconversion and selectivity to C5+, as well as HDO and Decarbs activity of fatty acids/biooil into hydrocarbon transportation fuel range. However, active metal reducibility has been shown to have more overriding influence than the degree of active metal dispersions since both processes requires metallicCo (i.e. Co0) as the active metal state[10, 12, 19–21]. To achieve high active metal reducibility, Al-Dalama and Stanislaus[22] studied the influence Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on the reducibility and metal–support interactions of SiO2–Al2O3 supported mono- and bi-metallic (Ni, Mo and NiMo) catalysts using temperature programmed reduction (TPR) technique, they reported that functionalization of themetals with EDTA reduced the MSI thus enhancing themetal reducibility by lowering reduction temperature from >800 °C to 450–550 °C. Since reduction of metaloxide to metallic state at high temperature is typically prone to sintering of the active metals, it is important to explore other means to synthesize easily or readily reducible supported metalcatalysts for FTS and HDO process.Information regarding the application and suitability of chelating agents to enhance reducibility of Co supported catalysts in FTS and HDO is rarely found in the present literature. Consequently, in this study, cobalt (II) oxalate was synthesize as FTScatalyst precursor via the functionalization of cobalt nitrate with oxalic acid (OxA) as a chelating agent. The prepared Co precursor was subsequently incorporated into ZSM-5 zeolite as catalyst support since ZSM-5 is known to favor gasoline range fuel. The reducibility and other characterization results and activity of the synthesized catalyst were compared with another Co-supported ZSM-5catalyst without OxA functionalization.
Materials and Methods
Materials
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich exceptoxalic acid (OxA) that was purchased from Spectrum chemicals, and all thechemicals were used with any pretreatment.
Catalyst synthesis
Two different catalyst were synthesized, the first was ZSM-5 zeolite (protonic form) supported cobalt (Co/ZSM-5) and the second was ZSM-5 supported cobalt oxalate (CoOx/ZSM-5) catalyst. TheCoOx/ZSM-5catalyst (30% Co loading) was synthesized in two steps, in the first step, thecobalt (II) oxalate precursor (CoOx) was synthesized via functionalization of 29.59 g cobalt nitrate hexahydrate (dissolved in 50 mL deionized water) with 9.148 g anhydrous OxA (equation (1)) in a round bottom flask wrapped with aluminum foil at 60 °C for 30 min. The observed pH of theCoOx was 1.43. In the second step, all theCoOx was added to 20 g ZSM-5 dispersion in 120 mL of deionized water under continuous stirring at 70 °C for 6 h to ensure complete incorporation of theCoOx into theZSM-5 support. TheCo/ZSM-5 (30% Co loading) was synthesized following the same procedure but without OxA functionalization. The observed pH of theCo precursor was 4.9. Both catalysts were dried in the oven at 100 °C for 12 h, grinded and calcined in nonreactive (N2) environment at 450 °C for 4 h.
Catalyst characterization
Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out with a SHIMADZU DTG-60/60 H instrument to determine theheat treatment required during calcination. 2 g of each sample was heated in a silicacrucible at a constant heating rate of 10 °C/min operating in a stream of N2 atmosphere with a flow rate of 40 mL/min from 30 to 800 °C and the weight loss per time, weight loss per temperature increment and temperature increment versus time were recorded. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption measurements (BET method) were performed at liquid nitrogen temperature (−196 °C) with an autosorb BET apparatus, Micromeritics ASAP 2020, surface area and porosity analyzer to determine the surface area, pore size and structure, and the pore volume. Extreme high resolution field emission scanning electron microscope (XHR-FESEM) and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) were performed to determine the samples morphology and elementalcomposition, respectively using Verios XHR-FESEM (Model 460 L, FEI™) equipped with a EDX detector. Thecatalyst microstructure and crystallographic information were studied by high resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) 200 kV with Field Emission (TECNAI G2 20 S-TWIN, FEI™). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples were measured with Philip PW 1820 diffractometer to determine thecrystal phase and structure of the incorporated metal. XPS analyses (Thermo-Fischer K-Alpha) were carried out to obtain thechemical nature, surface composition, oxidation state, relative surface compositions and the type of interaction between metal and support. The XPS was equipped with monochromatised AlKα source and the resulting samples spectra were analyzed using the Avantage software for peak fitting and identification of chemical state. The reduction behavior and active metal dispersion of thecatalysts was studied using a Thermo Finnigan TPD/R/O 1100 equipped with a thermalconductivity detector and a mass spectrometer. Typically, 20 mgcatalyst was placed in the U-shaped quartz tube. Catalyst samples were degassed under a flow of nitrogen at 200 °C to remove traces of water and impurities from thecatalyst pores. H2 temperature program reduction (TPR) was performed using 5% H2/N2 with a flow rate of 20 ml min−1 and heating from 40 to 700 °C at 5 °C min−1. The acidity of thecatalysts was analyzed by using temperature programmed desorption (NH3-TPD). The sample was pretreated at 300 °C for 2 h in He and cooled to 50 °C. After being saturated with NH3, the sample was purged with He to remove the physisorbed NH3. The TPD measurements of desorbed NH3 were conducted in flowing He from 60 °C to 970 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. All flow rates of He mentioned above were set to 20 mL min−1.
Catalytic performance test
Fischer–Tropsch synthesis
TheFTS reaction was performed in a stainless steel tube fixed-bed microreactor (PID Eng & Tech). In a given experiment, thestainless steel tube fixed-bed microreactor was disassembled and 0.3 g of either Co/ZSM-5 or CoOx/ZSM-5catalyst was carefully sandwiched between quartz wools to ensure an isothermal zone around thecatalyst and loaded into thestainless steel reactor tube. Thecatalyst was then reduced in-situ in a H2 stream at 50 mL min−1 at 450 °C for 2 h based on the TPR analysis. During theCOhydrogenation reaction, a mixture of reactant gas comprising H2/CO = 2/1 (v/v) was introduced into the reactor. The reaction temperature and pressure were 240 °C and 2 MPa, respectively at a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 1000 h−1 for 60 h. All post-reactor lines and valves were heated to 180 °C to prevent condensation. Thefeed and gaseous products were analyzed by an on-line gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890 A) equipped with two TCD detectors as well as HayesepQ and molsieve columns for analyses of H2 and permanent gases. Thehydrocarbons and other products were analyzed using a DB-1 column and a FID detector.
Oleic acid hydrodeoxygenation experiments
Oleic acid (OA) was hydrodeoxygenated in a 100 mL high pressure semi-batch reactor. Thecatalysts activities on the HDO process were tested at the previously[2, 23] best observed reaction conditions of 360 °C and 20 bar for temperature and pressure, respectively. The flow of carrier gas and reaction pressure inlet and outlet were controlled by a flow (Brooks 58505 S) and a pressure controller (Brooks 5866), respectively. Prior to the HDO process, 20 mg of catalyst (Co/ZSM-5 or CoOx/ZSM-5) was reduced under 10 bar H2 at 450 °C for 2 h prior to use. In a typical experiment, 40 g (~45 ml) of OA was added to the reactor containing the reduced catalyst after which the reactor was purged with He gas for 10 min. The operating temperature was established and monitored by a type-K Omega thermocouple placed inside the reactor. Before the reaction started, 100 ml/min of 90 vol% N2 and 10 vol% H2 was passed to the reactor until the desired reaction pressure was reached and the reaction commences by turning on the stirrer at an earlier predetermined speed of 2000 rpm. Based on preliminary studies, all experiments were performed under 60 min and the reactor set up was cooled by forced air before dismantled for product analysis. Liquid samples withdrawn from the reactor were dissolved in pyridine and thereafter silylated with (100 wt% excess of) N,O-bis(trimethyl)-trifluoroacetamide, BSTFA in an oven at 60 °C for 1 h prior to GC analysis. The internal standard eicosane, C20H42 was added for quantitative calculations. The withdrawn samples were analyzed with a gas chromatograph (GC, HP 6890) equipped with DB-5 column (60 m × 0.32 mm × 0.5 mm) and a flame ionization detector. 1 μl sample was injected into the GC with split ratio of 50:1 and helium was used as thecarrier gas. Thechromatographic program was well-adjusted to achieve satisfactory separation of the desired product and the product identification was validated with a gas chromatograph–mass spectrometer (GC–MS). OA molar conversion was calculated by dividing reacted moles by the initial number of moles loaded into the reactor, while the selectivity (S) was calculated as the number of moles of product recovered divided by the number of moles of OA that had reacted. To minimize uncertainties and guarantee reproducibility, some of the data point were repeated in three independent experiments. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Results and Discussions
Thermal gravimetric analysis
Generally, calcination temperature has a critical influence on the texture and crystallite size of supported catalyst based to the thermal response of the active metal precursors such as Co3O4 and hydrated CoOx (CoC2O4·2H2O) which in turn will affect the activity of the synthesized catalysts. Consequently, it is imperative to study the thermal behavior of the synthesized catalysts in relation to each other, and of course to the support. The TGA and DTA profiles of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 samples are shown in Fig. 1a,b. According to previous reports[24, 25] aluminosilicates generally shows three different and significant weight loss regions (WLR) under thermal treatment. From Fig. 1a, the first weight loss region below 180 °C was ascribed to interlayer and physisorbed water molecules which are mobile and freely bounded[24, 25]. The second WLR usually in the range of 300–500 °C are attributed to strongly bonded water molecules that are present in the first coordination sphere of the interlayer ions or lattice structure. The third weight loss at temperatures above 650 °C is characteristics of the structural hydroxyl groups that will condense and dehydrate at elevated temperatures[26]. Up to about 70 °C, all the three samples showed almost equal weight loss of 4.0%, however as the temperature ramped up to about 140 °C, Co/ZSM-5 showed further increase in weight loss with a cumulative of ~7.0% which can be ascribed to the interlayer and physisorbed water molecules as well as hydration effect during catalyst synthesis stage. Meanwhile, CoOx/ZSM-5 showed two regions with increased weight loss within the first WLR and maximized at 154 °C according to Fig. 1b with a cumulative weight loss of 9.2% which can be ascribed to combined effect of the interlayer/physisorbed water molecules, hydration effect at thecatalyst synthesis stage and complete dehydration of incorporated CoOx precursor (CoC2O4·2H2O) as shown in equation (2). From theDTA profile in Fig. 1b, there is a low intensity broad peak with maxima at 366 °Ccorresponding to 1.34% and 1.4% weight losses (Fig. 1a) for ZSM-5 and Co/ZSM-5, respectively in the second WLR which was earlier ascribed to strongly bonded water molecules. However, CoOx/ZSM-5 showed a distinctive peak at 383 °C and this was ascribed to combined loss of strongly bonded water molecules as seen in the other samples (ZSM-5 and Co/ZSM-5) as well as thermal decomposition of thealready dehydrated CoC2O4 into metallicCo and CO2 as shown in equation (3)[27, 28]. The observed weight loss in this region was ~3.5% which implied that about 2.1% was due to thermal decomposition of CoC2O4 in theZSM-5 matrix. This observation is in agreement with a recent study on the effect of microwave power on the thermal genesis of unsupported Co3O4 nanoparticles from cobalt oxalate micro-rods where a considerable weight loss with a sharp exothermic effects at 354 °C was reported[29].
Figure 1
TGA-DTG curves obtained for ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 catalysts.
TGA-DTG curves obtained for ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5catalysts.
Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms
TheN2 adsorption-desorption isotherms in Fig. 2 clearly shows that the volume of N2 adsorbed increases obviously with increasing relative pressures (P/Po) for ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5, and this can be attributed to the volume filling of micro-pores in the samples[30]. According to the isotherm of the samples, the volume of N2 adsorbed followed the order CoOx/ZSM-5 > ZSM-5 > Co/ZSM-5. The textural properties of all the three samples are summarized in Table 1. The external surface area and volume as well as the micropore area and micropore volume were calculated by the t-Plot method, and surface area was calculated by the (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller) BET method. The enhancement in the surface area, pore volume and pore size of CoOx/ZSM-5catalyst was due to the leaching influence of the acidicCoOx precursor and protonic effect from HNO3 (equation (1)). Previous reports[12, 30, 31] have shown that acid modification/treatment of aluminosilicates enhances textural properties such as porosity, specific surface area and pore volume via acid leaching of framework and extra-framework aluminum species. The well-developed external surface area and enhanced porosity are considered advantage towards guaranteeing high active metals dispersion thus inhibiting the propensity of sintering and formation of bulk Co-oxide. Conversely, the reduction in the specific surface area, pore volume and pore size in theCo/ZSM-5 was attributed to the partial blocking of the pores with bulk oxidized Co-oxide from the thermal decomposition of Co(NO3)2 precursor according to equation (4). The oxidized Co3O4 with increased particle sized having strong interaction with theZSM-5 support was also verified by the HRTEM, XHR-SEM and XPS results.
Figure 2
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5.
Table 1
Textural properties of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5.
Sample
t-Plot External Surface Area (m2/g)
t-Plot Micropore Area (m2/g)
BET Surface Area (m2/g)
total pore volume (cm3/g)
t-Plot External volume (cm3/g)
t-Plot micropore volume (cm3/g)
Pore diameter (nm)
ZSM-5
98.5
282.49
381.0
0.178
0.058
0.12
1.98
Co/ZSM-5
73.2
274.6
347.9
0.17
0.04
0.11
1.88
CoOx/ZSM-5
151
258.02
409.1
0.21
0.10
0.13
2.07
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5.Textural properties of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5.
EDX, TEM and XHR-SEM
TheEDX spectrum in Fig. 3a shows a high Si/Al ratio of 20 according to the quantification of the elemental analysis with average crystallite size is 1.85 micrometer (see Supplementary Figure S1). The spectra of Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 in Fig. 3b-,cconfirmed the successful incorporation of the respective Co precursors. Figure 3d,e show the HR-TEM images of Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5catalysts, respectively. The results revealed instances of agglomeration of metal particles in Co/ZSM-5catalyst possibly due to sintering of the active metals during calcination. Conversely, CoOx/ZSM-5 shows a clear degree of active metal dispersion. In addition the average metal particles sizes are smaller in CoOx/ZSM-5 than in Co/ZSM-5 which can also be ascribed to the acidic effect of OxA functionalization at the synthesis stage. Fakeeha et al.[12] reported that both active metal dispersion and metal particle size are very important factors in catalysts activity and controlling of carbon deposition. From their studies, catalysts with large particle sizes exhibits comparably lower activity and suffer acute carbon deposition, while catalysts with smaller particles sizes showed higher activities. Other studies have also shown that the modification of active metals with organic substance such as EDTA[22, 32] and OxA[1, 26] guarantee active metal dispersion with comparably smaller particles sizes leading to increased activity. Of special importance is the report of Martínez et al.[20] on the influence of cobalt precursor for the synthesis of Co/SBA-15catalyst, their TEM result supported by the XPS and TPR results showed that a much better Co dispersion was observed for oxidized samples prepared from acetate and acetylacetonate organic precursors as compared to that derived from cobalt (II) nitrate precursor. As previously noted, the enhancement in the textural properties of CoOx/ZSM-5 (Table 1) was ascribed to the acidicCoOx precursor and protonic effect from HNO3 which increased its surface area for effective Co dispersion, while the reduction in the pore volume and surface area of Co/ZSM-5 was ascribed to the blockage of the pores by the agglomerated Co particles as seen in Fig. 3d. The XHR-SEM morphology of Co/ZSM-5 in Fig. 3f further supported the agglomeration of Co while reasonable active metal dispersion is very obvious from the morphology of CoOx/ZSM-5 in Fig. 3g. The variation in theCo particles sizes in both catalysts is attributed to differences in metal support interaction due to theCo ligands from the functionalization of OxA which acts as structure directing agent (SDA) for incoming Co to interact with the support rather than with already formed Cocluster in CoOx/ZSM-5. TheEDX mapping of Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 in Fig. 3g,h also confirmed that Co particles suffers agglomeration in the former while there is ample Co dispersion in the latter.
Figure 3
(a–c) EDX spectra of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5, (d,e) TEM image of Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5, (f-g) XHR-FESEM images of Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5, (h–i) EDX mapping of Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5.
(a–c) EDX spectra of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5, (d,e) TEM image of Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5, (f-g) XHR-FESEM images of Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5, (h–i) EDX mapping of Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
The results of XPS analysis performed to determine the variations in the oxidation states of Co based on the effect of OxA functionalization are shown in Fig. 4 for Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5catalysts. The survey scan of theZSM-5 support and thecatalyst are shown in Fig. 4a, theZSM-5 survey scan showed the presence of Al, Si and O at binding energy (BE) of 67.35 eV, 107.38 eV and 537.89 eV, respectively. Both Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 revealed the presence of Co particles at BE of 796.45–778.68 eV. These peaks are consistent with theEDX results, and in agreement with previous literature reports[30, 32]. From Fig. 4b, theCo/ZSM-5catalyst showed BE at 779.88 eV and 796.18 eV, respectively representing theCo 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2 with a satellite peak at 791 eV and BE split ∆ECo (i.e. ∆ECo = Co 2p1/2 − Co 2p3/2) of 16.2 eV which is typical of Co3+ from the mixed-valance Co3O4. Therefore, Co3O4 was considered thecobalt phase in Co/ZSM-5catalyst[12]. However, for theCoOx/ZSM-5catalysts (Fig. 4c), theCo 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2 shifted towards lower BE of 778.21 eV and 793.55 eV, respectively, with comparably lower ∆ECo of 15.35 eV. The BE of 778.21 eV at Co 2p3/2 peak is typical of Cometal which showed that Cometal is present in theCoOx/ZSM-5catalysts. This is further supported by the absence of distinct satellites shake-up peaks between Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2 ascribable to either Co2+ or Co3+ oxidation states, however, a satellite at 802.3 eV suggests the presence of Co2+ species[12, 30, 32]. The presence of Cometallic state has been ascribed to the thermal decomposition of cobalt oxalate under inert atmosphere as shown in equation (3)[27] while the inadvertent present of Co2+can be ascribed to re-oxidation of themetallicCo according to equation (5) from theCO2 produced in equation (3)[28]. This confirmed that thechemical state of Co is greatly influenced by theOxA functionalization in theCoOx/ZSM-5catalyst. Therefore, it can be summarized that theCo/ZSM-5catalyst contains mainly Co3+ from Co3O4 as dominant species whereas theCoOx/ZSM-5catalyst contains Co0, and Co2+ ions in ion-exchange positions i.e. extra-framework Co2+
[32].
Figure 4
(a) Wide-survey XPS spectra scan of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5, (b) Co 2p spectra of Co/ZSM-5, (c) Co 2p spectra of CoOx/ZSM-5.
(a) Wide-survey XPS spectra scan of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5, (b) Co 2p spectra of Co/ZSM-5, (c) Co 2p spectra of CoOx/ZSM-5.This was further corroborated by the shift in theCo 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2 peaks at BE of 778.2 eV and 793.55 eV in CoOx/ZSM-5 to higher BE of 779.88 eV and 796.18 eV, respectively in Co/ZSM-5 which implied that there is very close assembly between Co3O4 particles and theZSM-5 support leading to stronger metal support interaction (MSI) in Co/ZSM-5catalyst. Thus, theOxA functionalization has been effective in guaranteeing surface active Co particles by reducing Co2+ and further constrained its electro-oxidation during thecatalyst synthesis stage. It is well known that oxalate anion (C2O4
2−) is a versatile chelating ligand that forms solid dihydratechains with several divalent metals such as Zn, Mg, Mn, Fe, Ni, and Co. In these metalcomplexes, theoxalate molecule adopts a planar (D2h) configuration such that the O–O distance adjusts to best match thecationicsize which makes oxalate a very versatile adsorbate and reducing compound. Thus, theoxalate anion is planar or near planer when bonded to small cations, and when bonded to larger cations theoxalate anion becomes twisted[26]. In this case, as CoOx solution complexes, theoxalate anion adjusts its dihedral angle, and therefore the O–O spacing to match thesize and spacing of theCo substrate leading to its adsorption on Co which minimized the access of Co to oxidative environment. This explains why there was no signature of Co3+ species at all in CoOx/ZSM-5catalyst. In addition, the enhanced surface area and porosity earlier seen in the BET result also ensured adequate active metal dispersion thus preventing agglomeration of active metal or sintering during calcination stages which can lead to formation of bulk Co-oxide with strong MSI as seen in the Fig. 3f. On thecontrary, the reduction in the surface area of Co/ZSM-5catalyst was ascribed to the formation of highly oxidized bulk Co-oxide (Fig. 3g) which partially blocked the pores of the support. These observations support the TEM results (Fig. 3d,e) and it explains why the O 1 s/Co 2p ratio in Co/ZSM-5 is higher than in CoOx/ZSM-5 (Table 2).
Table 2
XPS data of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5.
Samples
XPS BE (eV)
Atomic ratios
Co 2p3/2
Co 2p1/2
O 1 s/Co 2p
Olattice/Oadsorbed
ZSM-5
—
—
—
0.694
Co-ZSM-5
779.88
796.18
5.67
1.961
CoOx/ZSM-5
778.21
793.55
2.99
0.264
XPS data of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5.The XPS spectra of O 1 s for theZSM-5 support, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 are presented in Fig. 5, all the samples exhibited asymmetric two band structures. The peaks at lower BE of 529 eV are attributed to the lattice oxygen which are bonded to Co particles, while the peaks at higher BE 531.5 eV are characteristic of the adsorbed/surface oxygen, for example, from moisture. Table 2 shows that the ratio of Olattice/Oadsorbed increased in the order: Co/ZSM-5 > ZSM-5 > CoOx/ZSM-5. The result implied that during thecatalysts synthesis stage, theCo particles in Co/ZSM-5 were highly oxidized while theoxalate anion (C2O4
2−) ligand in CoOx/ZSM-5 mitigated the oxidation of theCo particles. Obviously, this explains why bulk Co-oxides with larger particle sizes was observed in theCo/ZSM-5 having close assembly and stronger MSI according to the HR-TEM, XHR-SEM and XPS results. This observation is in agreement with the report of Chen et al.[30] on modification of ZSM-5 membranes with Co–Cu–Mn mixed oxides. Since the Olattice/Oadsorbed ratio is lower in CoOx/ZSM-5compared to Co/ZSM-5 thus leading to higher O 1 s/Co 2p ratio in Co/ZSM-5 than CoOx/ZSM-5 (Table 2), then, the propensity for effective reduction process with H2 gas is more guaranteed in CoOx/ZSM-5. This observation further supports the high resolution Co 2p scan results (Fig. 4b,c) which showed that Co3+ from Co3O4 and combine Co0 + Co2+ are the predominant species in Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5, respectively, and it is in agreement with the X-ray diffraction patterns in Fig. 6.
Figure 5
XPS O 1 s spectra of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5.
Figure 6
XRD patterns of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5, CoOx/ZSM-5.
XPS O 1 s spectra of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5.XRD patterns of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5, CoOx/ZSM-5.
X-ray diffraction patterns
XRD patterns of ZSM-5, Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 are shown in Fig. 6 with distinctive ZSM-5 peaks at 2θ = 7.8°, 8.9°, 22.2°, 23.8°, 24.9°, 26.8°, 30.1° and 45.5° [1, 30]. It is clearly evident that the intrinsic lattice structure of theZSM-5 support in both catalysts was sparingly conserved. Although their diffraction peaks exhibits marginal lower intensities with apparent loss of crystallinity (similar to the observation in their morphologies) after incorporation of respective Co precursors and calcination, especially at lower diffraction angle below 2θ = 20°. The sparing conservation of the intrinsic lattice structure of theZSM-5 support is an important factor considering the fact that ZSM-5 zeolite has been reported to enhance the selectivity of FTS towards gasoline[12]. This shows that theCo/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 synthesis procedure is sufficiently expedient. The diffraction peaks at 2θ = 18.4°, 31.7°, 36.9°, 44.9° and 59.4° in Co/ZSM-5catalysts indicated that thecobalt species was mainly in the form of crystalline Co3O4
[11]. These peaks were not present in theCoOx/ZSM-5 samples which support the XPS result that Co3+ is the predominant specie in Co/ZSM-5. The peak at 2θ = 42.5° in Co/ZSM-5catalyst was ascribed to stable CoO species possibly in the pores of theZSM-5 support or from Co3O4. The peak is also seen in CoOx/ZSM-5, in addition, there are diffraction peaks at 2θ = 41.3°, 44.4° and 48.7° in CoOx/ZSM-5 which are reflections of theCo0
[33]. This observation confirmed that theoxalate ligand functionalization was able to reduce and constrain the electro-oxidation of cobalt oxidation state due to the versatility of oxalate anion (C2O4
2−) chelating ligand that forms stable polymorphic structure with a planar (D2h) configuration to constrain the electro-oxidation[26].
Temperature program reduction
The activity of FTScatalysts have been reported to be strongly dependent on the reducibility of theCoO and Co3O4 species since metallicCo is responsible for theCOhydrogenation and HDO processes. Consequently there is need for H2-TPR studies to validate the effect(s) of OxA functionalization earlier seen in other characterization results as shown in theH2-TPR profiles of Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 in Fig. 7. The TPR profiles have been normalized per weight of cobalt in thecatalyst to facilitate easy discussion. Typically the reduction process of Co3O4 particles proceeds in two distinctive steps, firstly reduction of Co3+ to Co2+ at a low temperature and the subsequent reduction of Co2+ to Co° at a high temperature as depicted by equations 5 and 6, respectively. From Fig. 7, there are three distinctive regions for Co/ZSM-5 sample, the reduction process in equations 5 and 6 were observed at reduction peak 320 and 440 °C in regions 1 and 2, respectively. There is another high-temperature peak at 650 °C in region 3 which could be assigned to more stable species such as cobalt silicate or cobalt aluminate[20], or even bulk Co3O4 (as seen in the TEM result) strongly interacting with theZSM-5 support as discussed in the XPS results. The reduction peak values observed for Co/ZSM-5 were in close agreement with the report of Wu et al.[12] that shows two distinct reduction peaks around 320 °C and at about 450 °C in the region 1 and 2, and a weak reduction peak at 650 °C in region 3 which was also ascribed to stable species such as cobalt silicate or cobalt aluminate on theZSM-5 support. The TPR profile of CoOx/ZSM-5 in region 1 showed an inconspicuous hump with a maxima at 205 °C which can be ascribed to reduction of adventitious oxidized Co3+ → Co2+ (although the presence of these adventitious oxidized Co3+ species were not observed in other techniques, it was ascribed to inadvertent exposure of thecatalyst sample to atmosphere during sample preparation prior to TPR analysis). Furthermore, the reduction took place at comparable lower temperature which confirmed that they were instantaneous superfluous surface species. The second reduction peak in the region 2 for CoOx/ZSM-5 with a maxima at 420 °Ccorrespond to reduction of CoO (which was earlier ascribed to reduction of CO2 according to equation (3) to Co° (equation (6)). The peak shifted towards lower reduction temperature compared to that of Co/ZSM-5 which further confirmed that theOxA functionalization was effective in minimizing the MSI leading to easily reducible species. Both peaks in region 1 and 2 have comparably lower intensities than those of Co/ZSM-5 which implied that the amount of hydrogen gas consumption based on equations (5–6) is low in CoOx/ZSM-5. This supports the observation in theCo 2p spectra of Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 in the XPS result and more importantly, it corroborates thecomparably higher O 1 s/Co 2p ratio in Co/ZSM-5 than in CoOx/ZSM-5 shown in Table 2.
Figure 7
H2-TPR profiles of the Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 catalysts.
H2-TPR profiles of theCo/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5catalysts.
Temperature program desorption-NH3
The result of catalyst acidity test for Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 are shown in theNH3- TPD profile in Fig. 8. Co/ZSM-5 revealed two distinctive acid site peaks, one at lower temperature of 376 °C which was assigned to thealuminumcenters of ZSM-5 and the dispersion of Co3O4 on the support of ZSM-5[12]. The peak shifted to higher temperature of 395 °C with increased intensity in CoOx.ZSM-5 and this variation was attributed to higher degree of Co species (Co and CoO) dispersion as well as comparably lower particle sizes (as seen in Fig. 3) leading to higher adsorption and desorption of the physisorbed NH3 from the acid sites on thecatalyst surface. The second peak in Co/ZSM-5 is at 596 °C which can be attributed to strong acid sites especially in thecatalyst pores. The peak became relatively more intense, broader and simultaneously shifted to higher temperature of 620 °C in CoOx/ZSM-5 which implied that there is higher desorption of the physisorbed NH3 from the acid sites in theCoOx/ZSM-5 pore but at a comparatively slower rate. These disparities in theCo/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 response to acidity test was ascribed to both the direct effect of acidic influence of oxalic acid functionalization and indirect effects as earlier seen in the BET, HR-TEM, XHR-SEM, XPS and XRD results of CoOx/ZSM-5. According to previous report[12], the acid sites are promotes isomerization and cracking of heavier hydrocarbons generated on the surface cobaltsites, thus CoOx/ZSM-5 is expected to favor skeletal isomerization of n-paraffin.
Figure 8
NH3 – TPD profiles of the Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 catalysts.
NH3 – TPD profiles of theCo/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5catalysts.
Performance of Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 catalysts
Time-on-stream (TOS) evolution of COconversion over Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5catalysts shown in Fig. 9 were 74.28% and 94.23% at 2 h TOS. The 74.28% observed for Co/ZSM-5 is in the neighborhood of 70.5% reported by other authors using Co supported on ZSM-5 at similar experimentalconditions[12]. Although with increasing TOS, Co/ZSM-5 loss about 2% COconversion activity within the first 16 h TOS and its activity remains almost unchanged afterwards for the next 44 h TOS. However, theCOconversion activity of CoOx/ZSM-5 was almost unchanged over the entire 60 h TOS. The initial loss of activity in Co/ZSM-5 is similar to the observation of Sartipi et al.[21] using Co/H-ZSM-5 at similar operating condition which showed about 11% loss in COconversion activity within 6 h TOS due to partial deactivation. The superiority display of CoOx/ZSM-5 was ascribed to theOxA functionalization which enhances its textural properties, degree of dispersion and metal support interaction leading to readily and effective reducibility as seen in thecharacterization results. In addition, thecomparable smaller particle size of Co species leading to more active sites as seen in the TEM result (Fig. 3) for CoOx/ZSM-5also contributed to its higher COconversion activity. This is supported by previous reports[12, 22, 26, 32] which showed that smaller particle sizes generally exhibits higher active metal dispersion and reducibility leading to comparably higher activity due to increase in the number of active sites, while catalysts with larger particles sizes showed poor active metal dispersion and reducibility leading to comparably lower activities.
Figure 9
Time-on-stream evolution of CO conversion over Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5. catalysts. Reaction conditions: T = 240 °C, P = 2.0 MPa, H2/CO = 2 and GHSV = 1000 h−1.
Time-on-stream evolution of COconversion over Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5. catalysts. Reaction conditions: T = 240 °C, P = 2.0 MPa, H2/CO = 2 and GHSV = 1000 h−1.The selectivity of the products obtained from both catalysts is shown in Fig. 10, with Co/ZSM-5 showing higher selectivity to light hydrocarbon (HC) products (C1 – C4) and lower selectivity for C5+ products. On the other hand, CoOx/ZSM-5 showed inverse relationship with higher selectivity to C5+ HC products and lower selectivity for C1 – C4. The higher selectivity for lower HC especially CH4 was due to thecomparably poor reducibility of Co3O4 particles in Co/ZSM-5since previous study has shown that CoO surface is essentially effective for CH4 production[12]. Khodakov et al.[13] also reported an inverse relationship between methane selectivity and the degree of Co reduction in a series of cobalt–supported mesoporous silicas with different pore sizes. Consequently, the higher selectivity to C5+ products in CoOx/ZSM-5 was due to the influence of theOxA functionalization that enhanced the textural properties and guarantee the formation of comparably smaller particle size Co0 and highly reducible CoO with higher dispersion. This is in agreement with a related study[12] on the preliminary evaluation of ZSM-5/SBA-15composite supported Cocatalysts for FTS which reported that higher cobalt dispersion and increase in supported catalyst porosity are essential to maximize the formation of theC5+ hydrocarbons. The study showed that as the amount of ZSM-5 is increased in theZSM-5/SBA-15composite from 0% to 30%, theC5+ hydrocarbons increase from 65.1% to 79.3% and they ascribed this increment to higher cobalt dispersion and enhanced catalyst pore sizes.
Figure 10
Time-on-stream products selectivity over Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 catalysts, Reaction conditions: T = 240 °C, P = 2.0 MPa, H2/CO = 2 and GHSV = 1000 h−1.
Time-on-stream products selectivity over Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5catalysts, Reaction conditions: T = 240 °C, P = 2.0 MPa, H2/CO = 2 and GHSV = 1000 h−1.It is worth noting that both Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5catalysts do not show the formation of CO2 which implied that thecompetitive water-gas shift reaction (WGS: CO + H2O → CO2 + H2) which is typical of very poorly reduced Co-based FTScatalysts does not take place, or at least negligible. Few other reports[12, 13] also did not observe the formation CO2 in the products distribution and authors ascribed this to high selectivity towards CH4 formation due to the presence of either unreduced cobalt species or to small cobalt particles strongly interacting with the support. However, Martínez et al.[20] reported a general parallelism between the selectivity to CH4 and CO2 in a study on the influence of Co loading over mesoporous SBA-15, and they concluded that the higher CH4 selectivity displayed by well-dispersed low-reducible catalysts could be due, at least in part, to a higher extent of the WGS reaction occurring on unreduced Co species. Both Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5catalysts showed the formation of iso-paraffin (i-C4H10), however, the ratio of iso/n paraffin is relatively higher for CoOx/ZSM-5 obviously due to increased acidity (Fig. 8) and enhanced textural properties (Fig. 2 and Table 1) as a result of theOxA functionalization. Studies[21, 26, 31, 34] have shown that increased acidity and porosity in zeolite supported catalysts are favorable for n-paraffin skeletal isomerization.
Hydrodeoxyhenation (HDO) of oleic acid
In order to further evaluate and appreciate the influence of theOxA functionalization, both Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5catalysts were tested for the HDO of oleic acid (OA) at previously established best observed reaction conditions of 360 °C and 20 bar[31, 34]. The result is shown in Fig. 11 with OAconversions of 59% and 92% over Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5, respectively. Thecomparably higher OAconversions on CoOx/ZSM-5 was ascribed to the lower Co particle sizes with higher dispersion and enhanced reducibility as seen in thecharacterization results. Thecomparably lower Co species particle sizes according to the HRTEM result increased the number of available Co species particles in CoOx/ZSM-5, and this is supported by its higher metal dispersion. Similarly, CoOx/ZSM-5 high and readily reducible Cometals guarantee the availability of higher number of active site for the HDO reaction. The products distribution over both catalysts are somewhat identicalalthough the amounts drastically varies with CoOx/ZSM-5 showing superior HDO and isomerization activities compared to Co/ZSM-5. The superior HDO activity is directly linked to thecombined high Co dispersion and reducibility as earlier mentioned, while the enhanced isomerization activity is tied to the high density of acid sites. Previous studies[31, 34] have shown that the acid sites of supported catalyst are favorable for the skeletal isomerization of hydrodeoxygenated n-paraffin, and the best isomerization temperature in those studies was 360 °C. Furthermore those studies showed that the production of considerable amount of isoparaffin had a favourable effect on thecold flow properties (e.g. cold filter plugging point), because the freezing point of a typicalisoparaffins is significantly lower than that of its corresponding n-paraffins[34]. In simple terms, this implied that the temperature at which a given n-paraffin began to freeze, thecorresponding isoparaffin is still essentially in liquid state.
Figure 11
Conversion of oleic acid and product distribution over Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 catalysts. Reaction conditions: T = 360 °C, hydrogen pressure = 20 bar, agitator speed = 2000 rpm, reaction time = 1 h and catalyst loading 20 mg. Others = stearic acid, octadecanol and octadecene.
Conversion of oleic acid and product distribution over Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5catalysts. Reaction conditions: T = 360 °C, hydrogen pressure = 20 bar, agitator speed = 2000 rpm, reaction time = 1 h and catalyst loading 20 mg. Others = stearic acid, octadecanol and octadecene.Both catalysts showed the formation of C17H36 which implied that there are instances of decarboxylation competing with HDO process through which part of theoxygen in theOA functional group was removed as CO2. Accordingly, the amount of CO2 formed was 0.07 and 0.4 mmol CO2/mmol OA for CoOx/ZSM-5 and Co/ZSM-5, respectively. The formation of CO2 indicated that there is loss of one carbon atom leading to decrease in the energy density. Therefore since the decarboxylation process is more pronounced over Co/ZSM-5, theOxA functionalization is effective towards achieving high energy density biofuel with exceptionalcold flow properties. There are other species that were observed in the products such as stearic acid, octadecanol and octadecene with stearic acid amounting to over 90% and 94%, respectively over Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5, and they are lumped up and referred to as “Others”. According to previous reports[26, 31, 35], thecatalytic HDO of OA proceeds in two stages, firstly the saturation of theC = C, followed by the removal of theO2 as water (Fig. 12), thus, this explains the why stearic acid was present among the products. Similarly, the presence of octadecanol and octadecene were due to certain parallel reaction where stearic acid was reduced to octadecanol which was subsequently dehydrated to octadecene[36]. Based on the result shown in Fig. 11, it is clear that theOxA functionalization was also effective in enhancing selectivity to the desired product by minimizing the extent of competing reactions.
Figure 12
Schematic of HDO of oleic acid to paraffin biofuel via stearic acid.
Schematic of HDO of oleic acid to paraffin biofuel via stearic acid.
Conclusion
The influence of OxA functionalization on ZSM-5 supported Cocatalyst has been studied in this report. Thecharacterization result showed that the functionalized cobalt oxalate supported ZSM-5catalyst (CoOx/ZSM-5) has superior textural properties, higher metal dispersion, reduced and readily reducible Co species compared to theconventiaonalcobalt supported on ZSM-5catalyst (Co/ZSM-5). The activites of both Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5 were evaluated in both Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and hyrdodeoxygenation (HDO) of oleic acid (OA) in paraffin biofuel. The Time-on-stream (TOS) evolution of COconversion over Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5catalysts were 74.28% and 94.23% at 0.5 h TOS and their selectivity to C5+ HC production were 63.15% and 75.4%, respectively at reaction conditions of 240 °C, 2.0 MPa, H2/CO = 2, GHSV = 1000 h−1 at 0.3 g catalyst loading. Similarly, in the HDO process, theOAconversion were 59% and 92% over Co/ZSM-5 and CoOx/ZSM-5, respectively. In addition CoOx/ZSM-5 showed superior HDO and isomerization activities compared to Co/ZSM-5. Thus, theOxA functionalization of Co is expedient.Supplementary information