| Literature DB >> 28855521 |
Hong Wang1,2, Xiangwei Huang3, Junhao Lin4, Jian Cui3,5, Yu Chen6, Chao Zhu1, Fucai Liu1, Qingsheng Zeng1, Jiadong Zhou1, Peng Yu1, Xuewen Wang1, Haiyong He1, Siu Hon Tsang7, Weibo Gao6, Kazu Suenaga4, Fengcai Ma5, Changli Yang3,8, Li Lu3,8, Ting Yu6, Edwin Hang Tong Teo9,10, Guangtong Liu11, Zheng Liu12,13,14.
Abstract
The discovery of monolayer superconductors bears consequences for both fundamental physics and device applications. Currently, the growth of superconducting monolayers can only occur under ultrahigh vacuum and on specific lattice-matched or dangling bond-free substrates, to minimize environment- and substrate-induced disorders/defects. Such severe growth requirements limit the exploration of novel two-dimensional superconductivity and related nanodevices. Here we demonstrate the experimental realization of superconductivity in a chemical vapour deposition grown monolayer material-NbSe2. Atomic-resolution scanning transmission electron microscope imaging reveals the atomic structure of the intrinsic point defects and grain boundaries in monolayer NbSe2, and confirms the low defect concentration in our high-quality film, which is the key to two-dimensional superconductivity. By using monolayer chemical vapour deposited graphene as a protective capping layer, thickness-dependent superconducting properties are observed in as-grown NbSe2 with a transition temperature increasing from 1.0 K in monolayer to 4.56 K in 10-layer.Two-dimensional superconductors will likely have applications not only in devices, but also in the study of fundamental physics. Here, Wang et al. demonstrate the CVD growth of superconducting NbSe2 on a variety of substrates, making these novel materials increasingly accessible.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28855521 PMCID: PMC5577275 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00427-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Atomic structure, morphologies, and characterizations of NbSe2 crystals. a Ball-and-stick model of monolayer 2H-NbSe2 viewed from three different directions. b Optical image of uniform NbSe2 crystals deposited on a SiO2/Si substrate. Scale bar, 40 µm. A representative AFM image (inset; scale bar, 1 µm) shows the typical thickness is 1.1 nm. c A monolayer NbSe2 crystal with edge length of 0.2 mm. d, e X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of the d Nb 3d and e Se 3d peaks from NbSe2 crystals deposited on SiO2/Si substrate. f–h Statistic thickness distributions and representative morphologies (inset) of NbSe2 crystals synthesized with T Se setting at f 300-340, g 360-420 and h 450-480 °C, respectively. Scale bars from inset of f–h are 20, 5 and 5 µm. Thickness of inset crystals of f–h are 1.1, 5.1 and 16.2 nm
Fig. 2ADF-STEM images, EELS, and EDX characterizations of the as-synthesized NbSe2 atomic layers. a A low magnified annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscope (ADF-STEM) image showing a large region of monolayer NbSe2 encapsulated by the graphene sandwich. The schematic is shown in the inset. b Atomic resolution ADF-STEM image of the hexagonal NbSe2 lattice. Diselenium vacancies are highlighted by red circles. The inset of panel b shows the structural model of 2H-NbSe2, with cyan and green color indicating Nb and Se atoms, respectively. c Different point defects in monolayer NbSe2 and their atomic models. Diselenium vacancy, monoselenium vacancy, and anti-site defect SeNb are highlighted by red, blue, and yellow circles, respectively. d Atomic resolution ADF-STEM image of two bilayer islands in NbSe2, showing the coexistence of 2H a and 2H c stacking sequence. The insets are corresponding atomic models and simulated STEM images. e STEM image of a large region of NbSe2 used for the collection of electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) spectra. The collected region is highlighted in red square. Nb and Se EELS mapping are provided next to it. f Typical EELS and g EDX spectra of the region shown in e. The Cu signal in the EDX spectra comes from the Cu grid. Scale bars, 500 nm (a), 2 nm (b), 0.5 nm (c), 5 nm (d), 50 nm (e)
Fig. 3ADF-STEM images of the grain boundary in monolayer NbSe2. a A tilted grain boundary with misorientation angle of 11°. Both atomically sharp lateral interconnected (red rectangle) and vertically stacked (blue rectangle) boundary regions are found to coexist. The inset shows the fast Fourier transformation (FFT) of the image. The distorted polygons are also highlighted in the red rectangle. Scale bar, 0.5 nm. b Selected FFT-filtered image of the two domains and their overlap images. The overlapped image confirms the coexistence of the two types of grain boundaries. Scale bar, 1 nm. c Similar tilted grain boundary without an overlapping region nearby. The orange lines indicate the five-seven dislocation pairs, which is consistent with the theoretical predictions of the grain boundary structure. Scale bar, 1 nm
Fig. 4Superconductivity in monolayer NbSe2 devices. a Temperature dependence of the longitudinal resistance R for sample A—a monolayer NbSe2 device. Upper left inset: Optical image of a typical graphene protected monolayer NbSe2 device. Lower right inset: Superconductivity in monolayer, 5-layer and 10-layer NbSe2 devices. b Superconductivity of sample A in different magnetic fields. c Temperature dependence of the upper critical field H c2. The solid line is the linear fit to H c2. d Voltage–current (V-I) characteristic at different temperatures on a logarithmic scale. The solid blue line indicates the Ohmic behavior at high temperature. The solid black line represents the expected V∝I 3 behavior at the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition. The inset shows the temperature-dependent exponent deduced from the power-law behavior, V∝I . As indicated by the red dashed line, α approaches 3 at T = 0.8 K
Fig. 5Comparison of the superconducting performance of monolayer NbSe2 prepared by CVD and other methods. From left to right: domain size, residual resistance ratio RRR, T onset, T c (0.5 RN), T zero, and 1/ΔT c for monolayer NbSe2 samples prepared with different methods