Literature DB >> 28855445

Culturable Facultative Methylotrophic Bacteria from the Cactus Neobuxbaumia macrocephala Possess the Locus xoxF and Consume Methanol in the Presence of Ce3+ and Ca2.

María Del Rocío Bustillos-Cristales1, Ivan Corona-Gutierrez1, Miguel Castañeda-Lucio1, Carolina Águila-Zempoaltécatl1, Eduardo Seynos-García1, Ismael Hernández-Lucas2, Jesús Muñoz-Rojas1, Liliana Medina-Aparicio2, Luis Ernesto Fuentes-Ramírez1.   

Abstract

Methanol-consuming culturable bacteria were isolated from the plant surface, rhizosphere, and inside the stem of Neobuxbaumia macrocephala. All 38 isolates were facultative methylotrophic microorganisms. Their classification included the Classes Actinobacteria, Sphingobacteriia, Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria. The deduced amino acid sequences of methanol dehydrogenase obtained by PCR belonging to Actinobacteria, Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria showed high similarity to rare-earth element (REE)-dependent XoxF methanol dehydrogenases, particularly the group XoxF5. The sequences included Asp301, the REE-coordinating amino acid, present in all known XoxF dehydrogenases and absent in MxaF methanol dehydrogenases. The quantity of the isolates showed positive hybridization with a xoxF probe, but not with a mxaF probe. Isolates of all taxonomic groups showed methylotrophic growth in the presence of Ce3+ or Ca2+. The presence of xoxF-like sequences in methylotrophic bacteria from N. macrocephala and its potential relationship with their adaptability to xerophytic plants are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tehuacan; lanthanides; pectin metabolism; rare-earth elements; xoxF5

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28855445      PMCID: PMC5606694          DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME17070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbes Environ        ISSN: 1342-6311            Impact factor:   2.912


Methanol, one of the most common C1 compounds delivered by plants, is released through the stomata. This compound is also produced with the decay of pectin and lignin from dead plant tissue (1, 19, 47). Methanol and organic molecules without C-C bonds are utilized as carbon and energy sources by methylotrophic organisms. These organisms are classified as facultative or obligate methylotrophs depending on their capability to use compounds with multiple C and C-C bonds. Methylotrophic microorganisms are ubiquitous and include organisms of the Classes Actinobacteria, Spirochaetes, Alpha-, Beta-, Gamma-, and Deltaproteobacteria, of the Phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, Nitrospirae, Verrucomicrobia, Cyanobacteria, and Planctomycetes, and even of the domain Archaea (5, 8, 15, 22, 25, 29, 30, 35, 38, 43). Many methylotrophic bacteria are commonly associated with plants. Nevertheless, there have not yet been reports in Cactaceae. Several methylotrophs exert positive effects when inoculated in plants (37–39, 54). These responses have been attributed to different mechanisms such as nitrogen fixation, decreased metal toxicity, the contribution of pyrrolo-quinoline quinone (PQQ), elicitation of plant defenses, decreased plant levels of ethylene, and the synthesis of molecules including phytohormones, vitamin B12, polysaccharides, and osmoprotectants (11, 39–41, 49, 57, 60). Methanol and methane-catabolizing microorganisms oxidize methanol through different dehydrogenases, and the methanol dehydrogenase, MxaFI-MDH has been examined in the most detail. It is a heterotetramer that is encoded by the genes mxaF and mxaI, and its activity depends on PQQ and Ca2+ as co-factors (10). MxaFI-MDH is typically carried by Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and a few Betaproteobacteria. Some Betaproteobacteria also possess the PQQ methanol dehydrogenase MDH2, which shows sequence similarity to MxaFI-MDH (24, Fig. 1). Low GC Gram-positive methylotrophs typically have a NADPH-dependent methanol dehydrogenase (6), and a methanol:NDMA (N,N′-dimethyl-4-nitrosoaniline) oxidoreductase has been reported in the Class Actinobacteria (23, 48). Other dehydrogenases phylogenetically related to MxaFI-MDH include a diverse but related group of enzymes called XoxF. Recent studies demonstrated that XoxF dehydrogenases oxidize methanol and depend on rare-earth elements instead of Ca2+ as co-factors (18, 27, 46, 50). A sequence analysis revealed that XoxF enzymes are grouped in at least five classes (55).
Fig. 1

Phylogeny of putative methanol dehydrogenase amplicons of N. macrocephala isolates. Sequences of N. macrocephala isolates are shown in bold blue letters. Sequences were aligned by Muscle. Phylogeny was constructed with maximum-likelihood in MEGA 6.0 using deduced amino acid sequences. A total of 500 iterations were used for bootstrapping.

Neobuxbaumia macrocephala is a xerophytic branching columnar Cactaceae with a height from 3 to 15 m. This plant is endemic to the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Biosphere Reserve and its distribution is confined to a few patches with calcareous soils (44, 51, 58). N. macrocephala has smaller populations than other Neobuxbaumia species that reside in other semi-arid habitats (16). Rhizospheric and non-rhizospheric bacteria associated with cacti mostly include Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Alphaproteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Planctomycetes, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, and Acidobacteria (2, 3, 34, 56). Limited information is currently available on the ecological interactions among cacti and microorganisms, including those of N. macrocephala. In order to design any future restoration strategy for endangered plant species, it is desirable to retrieve a broad knowledge of its biology. The diversity of cultured methylotrophic bacteria associated with this plant was investigated as the first step with the aim of gaining insights into the ecology of N. macrocephala with microorganisms, and as a prerequisite for future inoculation experiments using this plant.

Materials and Methods

Sampling

Rhizospheric soil, surface, and endophytic samples were obtained from six plant specimens from the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Biosphere Reserve. Approximately 10 g of rhizospheric soil (profundity 15–25 cm) was retrieved from a distance within 1 m of the sampled specimen. Approximately 5 cm2 of the stem surface was sampled with sterile swabs soaked in sterile 10 mM MgSO4 solution. The swabs were deposited in 1 mL of the same solution. Regarding endophytic samples, ca. 5 cm2 of the stem surface was disinfected with 70% ethanol, and ca. 1 cm3 of tissue was extracted with a sterile scalpel. All samples were kept in sterile plastic sealed bags and transported under chilled conditions to the lab.

Isolation and DNA extraction

In order to isolate endophytes, approximately 2 mm of surface plant tissues including the cuticle were discarded under sterile conditions. The remaining plant material was macerated in a sterile mortar and resuspended in 10 mM MgSO4 (1:10 w:v). Epiphytic suspensions and soil dilutions in 10 mM MgSO4 were inoculated on plates (1.6% agar) of methanol mineral salts medium (MMSM; 21) containing 0.5% methanol; 6.89 mM K2HPO4; 4.56 mM KH2PO4; 0.228 mM CaCl2; 0.811 mM MgSO4; 1.71 mM NaCl; 3.7 μM FeCl3; 3.8 mM (NH4)2SO4; 20 nM CuSO4; 41.5 nM MnSO4; 38 nM Na2MoO4; 0.163 μM H3BO3; 0.243 μM ZnSO4; and 21 nM CoCl2, and incubated at 30°C for 8–10 d. Isolated bacterial colonies were streaked in the same medium and incubated at 30°C until growth was observed. Isolated colonies were grown in the same medium and also in GP containing (L−1): Casein peptone 10 g, glycerol 10 g, and agar 15 g. DNA was extracted from cells growing in MMSM medium with the DNA Isolation Kit for Cells and Tissues (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) following the recommended instructions of the supplier.

Ca2+ and Ce3+-methanol dependent growth

Isolates were grown in GP plates at 30°C for 4 d. One loopful of bacterial cells was washed twice in 10 mM MgSO4, resuspended in 10 mL of the same solution, and 5 μL of the suspension was inoculated in 5 mL of modified MMSM with 30 μM CaCl2 or lacking Ca2+ but with 30 μM CeCl3. Cells were incubated at 30°C under shaking for 5 d. Bacterial growth was assessed by absorbance at 600 nm 72, 96, 120, and 144 h after the inoculation. The cultures of three independent replicates grown in either Ca2+ or Ce3+-MMSM broths were statistically compared by the unpaired t-test, P<0.05.

Dot blot hybridization

Genomic DNAs were transferred to nylon filters by dot blots, with 1 μg of DNA per dot, except for M. extorquens JCM2802, which had 100 ng. One microgram of U. maydis 207 was used as a negative control. One hundred nanograms of DNA 32P-labeled probes specific for mxaF and xoxF5 were used for hybridizations. These probes were obtained by the PCR amplification of Methylobacterium extorquens JCM2802 genomic DNA with the primers mxa f1003 and mxa r1561 (42); and xoxFf361 and xoxFr603 (Table 1), for mxaF and xoxF5, respectively. The sizes of the probes were ca. 560 bases for mxaF and ca. 240 bases for xoxF5. The probes were labeled with [α-32P]dCTP by polymerase extension using random primers (Amersham Rediprime II DNA Labeling System, GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Prehybridization and hybridization were performed at 65°C for 12 h using Rapid Hyb buffer (GE Healthcare). The membranes were washed under high stringency conditions (2×SSC [1×SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate] plus 0.1% SDS for 10 min, 1×SSC plus 0.1% SDS for 15 min, 0.5×SSC plus 0.1% SDS for 15 min, 0.1×SSC plus 0.1% SDS for 15 min, 0.1×SSC plus 0.1% SDS at 65°C for 30 min, and SDS was then removed with 0.1×SSC) (52).
Table 1

Methanol dehydrogenase primers.

Primer*Sequence (5′-3′)TargetReference
mxa f1003GCG GCA CCA ACT GGG GCT GGTmxaF(42)
mxa r1561GGG CAG CAT GAA GGG CTC CC
xoxF361fCAG GAT CCG TCC GTG ATM. extorquens xoxFThis work
xoxF603rSGA GAT GCC GAC GAT GA
mxaFxoxF916fGGC GAC AAC AAG TGG WCG ATGmxaF, xoxF4, xoxF5This work
mxaFxoxF1360rAGT CCA TGC AGA CRT GGT T

Numbers indicate approximate position in the gene.

DNA amplification and sequencing

16S rRNA genes were amplified with the primers B27F (5′-TAG AGT TTG ATC CTG GCT CAG-3′) and B1392R (5′-CAG GGG CGG TGT GTA-3′) using the following conditions: one initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, 26 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 57°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Methanol dehydrogenase genes were amplified with the primers mxaFxoxFf916 and mxaFxoxFr1360 (Table 1) designed to preferentially amplify mxaF, xoxF4, and xoxF5, using the following conditions: one initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, 35 cycles at 94°C for 20 s, 55°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 min, and one final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The design of the primers mxaFxoxFf916 and mxaFxoxFr1360 was based on the alignments of the mxaF, xoxF4, and xoxF5 public sequences. The alignments of other xoxF subfamilies did not show sufficiently long conserved regions for designing potentially acceptable primers. Sanger DNA sequencing were performed at the Instituto de Biotecnología (UNAM, www.ibt.unam.mx) with the primers used for PCR amplification.

Sequence analysis

Sequence analyses were performed with MEGA 7.0 (32). The sequences were aligned with the database sequences of related microorganisms by ClustalW. Pairwise distances and neighbor joining trees were used to elucidate the genus identity of the 16S rRNA sequences. The phylogeny of methanol dehydrogenases was inferred with the maximum likelihood method with the deduced amino acid sequences. Initial trees were assessed by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances, and then selecting the topology with the greatest log likelihood value. Confidence was evaluated by bootstrapping with 500 iterations.

Nucleotide sequences

16S rRNA sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KT936080–KT936091, KT936093, KT936095, KT936096, KT936105, KT936109–KT936114, KT936119, KT936125–KT936127, KT936134, KT936135, KT936140, KT936141, KT936144, KT936145, and KY00648–KY00653; and xoxF sequences under the accession numbers KT932117–KT932121, KT932123, KT932124, KT932126–KT932128 and KY884986–KY884988 (Table 2).
Table 2

Methylotrophic culturable isolates from N. macrocephala.

IsolateGenusTaxonomic Class16S rRNA Acc. Num.OriginHybridization withAmplicons with mxaF-xoxF primers Acc. Num.Subjected to the methanol-Ca2+/Ce3+ experiment

mxaFxoxF
UAPS0102ArthrobacterActinobacteriaKT936093RhizosphericNDPNAYes
UAPS0104ArthrobacterKT936095EpiphyticNDSNANo
UAPS0105ArthrobacterKT936096RhizosphericNDPKT932119DYes
UAPS0126PedobacterSphingobacteriiaKT936125RhizosphericNDNNAYes
UAPS0120MicrovirgaAlphaproteobacteriaKT936105EpiphyticNDNKY884987Yes
UAPS0121MicrovirgaKT936119EpiphyticSSNAYes
UAPS0136MicrovirgaKT936112EpiphyticNDSNAYes
UAPS0137MicrovirgaKT936113EpiphyticNDPNAYes
UAPS0106InquilinusKT936134RhizosphericNPKY884986Yes
UAPS0142InquilinusKT936135RhizosphericPPKT932126DYes
UAPS0122MethylobacteriumKT936114EndophyticPPNAYes
UAPS0123MethylobacteriumKT936111RhizosphericSPKY884988Yes
UAPS0160RhizobiumKT936127RhizosphericPPNANo
UAPS0110SphingomonasKT936140EndophyticNPNANo
UAPS0115Subaequorebacter/KT936141EndophyticNPKT932127DYes
Geminicoccus
UAPS0114MassiliaBetaproteobacteriaKT936109EpiphyticPPKT932123DNo
UAPS0174MassiliaKT936144EpiphyticPPNANo
UAPS0175MassiliaKT936145EpiphyticSPKT932128DNo
UAPS0177MassiliaKT936110EpiphyticNPKT932124DYes
UAPS0117AcinetobacterGammaproteobacteriaKT936080EpiphyticSPKT932117Yes
UAPS0118AcinetobacterKT936081EpiphyticPSNANo
UAPS0127AcinetobacterKT936082EpiphyticNDNNANo
UAPS0145AcinetobacterKT936083EpiphyticPNNANo
UAPS0149AcinetobacterKT936084EpiphyticPNNANo
UAPS0156AcinetobacterKT936085EpiphyticPNNANo
UAPS0158AcinetobacterKT936086RhizosphericPNNANo
UAPS0163AcinetobacterKT936087EpiphyticPNNAYes
UAPS0165AcinetobacterKT936088EpiphyticNDNNANo
UPAS0168AcinetobacterKT936089EpiphyticPSNANo
UAPS0169AcinetobacterKT936090EpiphyticSSKT932118DNo
UAPS0172AcinetobacterKT936091EpiphyticPSNANo
UAPS0179AcinetobacterKY400648RhizosphericNDSKT932120Yes
UAPS0180AcinetobacterKY400649EndophyticNDPKT932121Yes
UAPS0181AcinetobacterKY400650EpiphyticNDPNANo
UAPS0182AcinetobacterKY400651EndophyticNDPNAYes
UAPS0183AcinetobacterKY400652EndophyticNDPNANo
UAPS0184AcinetobacterKY400653RhizosphericNDPNANo
UAPS0155PseudomonasKT936126EpiphyticPPNAYes

N, negative hybridization; P, positive hybridization; S, slight hybridization; ND, not determined; NA, not amplificated with the primersmxaf916 and mxar1360 D, XoxF sequences long enough to cover Asp301.

Results

Thirty-eight bacterial isolates (Classes Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Sphingobacteriia) were obtained using methanol as the sole carbon and energy sources (Table 2). All isolates showed facultative growth using other carbon and energy sources. No obligate methylotrophic bacteria were found. Twenty-two strains were isolated from the plant surface (one Actinobacteria, four Alphaproteobacteria, four Betaproteobacteria, and thirteen Gammaproteobacteria); six isolates were endophytic (three Alphaproteobacteria and three Gammaproteobacteria); and ten were rhizospheric (two Actinobacteria, one Sphingobacteriia (Phylum Bacteroidetes), four Alphaproteobacteria, and three Gammaproteobacteria). The identity of methylotrophic bacteria from the plant surface, from inside the plant, or the rhizosphere were as follows: Arthrobacter, one epiphyte and two rhizospheric; Pedobacter, one rhizospheric, Microvirga, four epiphytes; Inquilinus, two rhizospheric; Methylobacterium, one epiphyte, and one rhizospheric; Rhizobium, one rhizospheric; Sphingomonas, one endophyte; Subaequorebacter/Geminicoccus, one endophyte; Massilia, four epiphytes; Acinetobacter, twelve epiphytes, three rhizospheric, and three endophytes; and Pseudomonas, one epiphyte (Table 2, Fig. S1). All methylotrophic isolates tested showed growth with methanol as the carbon and energy sources and Ca2+ or REE, Ce3+, as co-factors (Table 3). Different isolates showed distinct methylotrophic growth rates. Hence, the time of their maximum growth in the presence of Ce3+ ranged between a 72- and 144-h incubation. Most of the isolates did not show any preference for either co-factor, whereas it was apparent for some that one of the co-factors improved methylotrophic growth. In this assay, 22 isolates were selected to include all taxonomical groups. These strains included two Actinobacteria, one Sphingobacteriia, ten Alphaproteobacteria, one Betaproteobacteria, and eight Gammaproteobacteria.
Table 3

Methylotrophic growth with Ca2+ or Ce3+ as co-factor for methanol dehydrogenase.

TimeGenusStrainGrowth with

Ca2+Ce3+
72 hSphingomonasUAPS01100.78830.7637
MethylobacteriumUAPS01231.0710*0.7660
RhizobiumUAPS01600.87170.9367

96 hMethylobacteriumUAPS01220.41230.3007

120 hArthrobacterUAPS01020.85631.3483*
ArthrobacterUAPS01050.79101.1037
Subaequorebacter/
GeminicoccusUAPS01150.20570.7513*
AcinetobacterUAPS01171.0703*0.7873
MicrovirgaUAPS01200.9390*0.4777
MicrovirgaUAPS01210.9967*0.7640
PedobacterUAPS01260.9957*0.7133
MicrovirgaUAPS01371.10330.8533
InquilinusUAPS01420.66830.9637
PseudomonasUAPS01550.61400.6230
AcinetobacterUAPS01631.20731.2163
AcinetobacterUAPS01690.96801.4060*
MassiliaUAPS01770.68171.0697*
AcinetobacterUAPS01801.37071.1673
AcinetobacterUAPS01820.99201.0623
AcinetobacterUAPS01830.86101.1247

144 hMicrovirgaUAPS01360.60870.2263
AcinetobacterUAPS01790.37570.8020

Data correspond to absorbance at 600 nm, the media of three replicates. Cells were incubated under shaking at 30°C. The registers correspond to their time of maximum growth in the presence of Ce3+. The growth of each strain in the presence of Ca2+/Ce3+ wascomparedandthesignificance of differences between two values was assessed by the unpaired t-test, P>0.05. Values marked with an asterisk are significantly higher than their counterparts.

Amplicons (approximately 550 bp in length) with mxaFxoxFtargeted primers were obtained in 34.2% (13) of the isolates. All sequences were more similar to XoxF-like methanol dehydrogenases than to MDH-like methanol dehydrogenases (Fig. 1). After the sequence analysis, five Alphaproteobacteria, three Betaproteobacteria, four Gammaproteobacteria, and one Actinobacteria isolates were found to possess xoxF5-like sequences. Furthermore, Asp301 characteristic of XoxF dehydrogenases was detected in all of the amplicons that covered that region (Fig. 2, Table 2).
Fig. 2

Partial alignment of sequences of methanol dehydrogenases that cover the region encoding Asp301. Asp301 (D) has been detected in all XoxF dehydrogenases and it is necessary for REE coordination. MxaF dehydrogenases do not possess Asp301.

Among the twenty-five isolates from which amplicons were not obtainable with the mxaf and xoxF-targeted primers, eleven clearly hybridized with a xoxF5 probe from M. extorquens (Table 2; Fig. 3): one Actinobacteria, four Alphaproteobacteria, one Betaproteobacteria, and five Gammaproteobacteria. The remaining fourteen isolates did not hybridize to the xoxF5 probe or were not amplified with the mxaFxoxF primers, including one Actinobacteria, one Sphingobacteriia, two Alphaproteobacteria, and ten Gammaproteobacteria. Hybridization with the mxaF probe was very faint; however, some dots indicated that the organism possessed mxaF loci (Fig. S2).
Fig. 3

Dot-blot hybridization with xoxF. Lines A1, UAPS0104; A2, UAPS0105; A3, UAPS0106; A4, UAPS0181; A5, UAPS0110; A6, UAPS0102; A7, UAPS0184; B1, UAPS0182; B2, UAPS0149; B3, UAPS0121; B4, UAPS0122; B5, UAPS0123; B6, UAPS0126; B7, UAPS0127; C1, UAPS0114; C2, UAPS0136; C3, UAPS0137; C4, UAPS0180; C5, UAPS0115; C6, UAPS0142; C7, UAPS0145; D1, UAPS0179; D2, UAPS0174; D3, UAPS0118; D4, UAPS0155; D5, UAPS0156; D6, UAPS0158; D7, UAPS0177; E1, UAPS0165; E2, UAPS0120; E3, UAPS0160; E4, UAPS0168; E5, UAPS0169; E6, UAPS0175; E7, UAPS0172; F1, UAPS0117; F2, UAPS0183; F3, UAPS0163; F4, M. extorquens JCM2802 (100 ng); F5, Ustilago maydis 207; F6 and F7, void. One microgram of total DNA of the bacterial strains evaluated was transferred to nylon membranes. PCR probes (100 ng) were obtained by the PCR amplification of Methylobacterium extorquens JCM2802 with the primers xoxF5f361 5′-CAG GAT CCG TCC GTG AT-3′ and xoxF5r603 5′-SGA GAT GCC GAC GAT GA-3′.

Discussion

Methanol and methane are very common carbon compounds produced by plants (19, 28). Methylotrophy is distributed in many different taxa (31). In this study, bacteria of the Classes Actinobacteria, Sphingobacteria, Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria were isolated in a methanol-based medium. Since this mostly plant-originated compound is a very common C-source in nature, numerous plant-associated microorganisms have the capability to use it. Among the methylotrophs cultivated from N. macrocephala and its rhizosphere, most were isolated from the stem surface. We hypothesize that this relates to the presence of stomata and consequently to the main source of methanol from inner plant tissues (19). All the dehydrogenase sequences obtained were similar to xoxF5, genes that are phylogenetically related to other xoxF subfamilies and to mxaF. These xoxF5-like sequences were obtained from isolates belonging to the Classes Actinobacteria, and Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria. mxaF-like sequences were previously identified in these classes and the phyla Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobia (4, 9, 29). Aspartic acid 301, the amino acid responsible for REE coordination (27), was detected in all of the sequences that covered that region. In contrast, none of the sequences showed different amino acids to Asp in that position. Additionally, none of the amplicons with mxaFxoxFtargeted primers were mxaF; they were xoxF5. Therefore, the sequenced amplicons coded for XoxF dehydrogenases. Nevertheless, we cannot rule out that some of the isolates possessed mxaF due to faint dot-blot hybridization with a mxaF probe. Positive hybridization with the xoxF probe indicated that these strains may possess xoxF5. Although we cannot exclude sequences of other xoxF subfamilies cross-hybridizing with the probe, hybridization and washing stringency conditions reduce that possibility. Some of the isolates that did not hybridize with the xoxF5 and mxaF probes or were not amplified with mxaF-xoxF primers may possess other sequences of the xoxF subfamilies or other methanol dehydrogenases such as MDH2 or NAD-dependent methanol dehydrogenase. Although we also designed primers and unsuccessfully attempted the amplification of methanol:NDMA oxidoreductase (Table S1, Results not shown), its presence cannot be excluded. In some of the cases in which we detected hybridization to mxaF or xoxF5, we did not obtain amplicons of methanol dehydrogenase genes. This inconsistency may be related to the design of the primers. All isolates tested in the methylotrophy assay grew using Ce3+, as expected, but also used Ca2+ as a co-factor. Therefore, it currently remains unclear whether XoxF enzymes accept Ca2+ besides REE, as suggested by Keltjens et al. 2014 (27). The ubiquities of xoxF, of their peptides, and of the bacteria carrying them in nature have been demonstrated in different studies, including the N. macrocephala-related ecosystem. XoxF has been detected in the phyllospheres of rice, clover, soybean, and Arabidopsis (15, 30). A previous study in a particular marine environment also showed the high abun-dance of XoxF (53). In an autecological approach, a semi in situ SIP assay detected the strong expression of a xoxF-like locus in Methylotenera mobilis (59). Furthermore, methanol oxidation in Methylomicrobium buryatense, possessing xoxF and mxaFI functional loci appeared to be mainly accomplished by XoxF (12). It has not yet been established whether there is a biogeography of subfamilies of xoxF. New studies on methylotrophy with non-culture and culture approaches in different environments are needed. A pioneer ecological study of the different xoxF subfamilies in coastal marine water only detected sequences of the clusters xoxF4 and xoxF5 (55). In a different environment, the methanol dehydrogenase peptides XoxF and MxaF of Methylobacterium, a microorganism that only possesses xoxF5 and mxaF sequences, were abundantly detected in the phyllosphere of soybean, clover, rice, and A. thaliana (15, 30). The present culture-dependent study demonstrated the presence of microorganisms possessing sequences of the subfamily xoxF5 in the semi-arid environment of N. macrocephala. A previous study with some XoxF enzymes reported high affinity for methanol (27, 50). If the enzymes of more diverse microorganisms exhibit similar behaviors, XoxF may be crucial for methylotrophic bacteria that thrive in plants showing slow metabolic properties and producing methanol at low rates, such as cacti. The presence of XoxF may be favored in environments in which sand, and, thus, REEs, are abundant, such as arid lands (50). Besides its participation in methylotrophic metabolism, XoxF may be involved in the regulation of stress responses and in denitrification metabolism (17, 45). Its putative role in stress responses may be particularly important in semi-arid areas and in plant surfaces. Although the typical methanol dehydrogenase from Actinobacteria is methanol:NDMA oxidoreductase, they do not exclusively carry it. The synthesis of PQQ by Actinobacteria in the presence of methanol suggested the presence of a PQQ-dependent methanol dehydrogenase (22). In another study, a Brevibacterium casei strain, an actinobacterial methylotrophic human mouth microorganism, carried a mxaF methanol dehydrogenase sequence (4; see Fig. 1), and more recently, metagenomic studies in the desert of Atacama detected Pseudonocardia PQQ methanol dehydrogenase genes (36). The presence of xoxF genes in Actinobacteria isolated in this study may have originated from lateral transfer events, as has been detected in the locus mxaF of methanotrophic bacteria (7, 33) and in methylotrophic Alphaproteobacteria (7). The methylotrophic isolates from the environment of N. macrocephala belonged to Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Sphingobacteriia. Among them, Acinetobacter spp. (Gammaproteobacteria) were the most frequently isolated organisms. It has been reported that Acinetobacter uses methanol as a carbon source (20, 61) and a methanol dehydrogenase sequence coding Asp301 has previously been detected in this genus (20). Similar to these findings, other studies identified Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria as some of the most common taxa in the rhizosphere and soil from cacti and other plants from arid lands (2, 11, 13, 26). Methylotrophic bacteria are ubiquitous and have meaningful roles in ecosystems. Since water is mostly limited in arid environments, perennial plants from these environments show restrained growth, particularly throughout the dry season. The community of methylotrophic culturable bacteria associated with the semi-arid thriving cactus N. macrocephala include xoxF-like dehydrogenases-possessing microorganisms. Their ecological role in xerophytic plants warrants further study. Since the cultivation procedures employed in the present study do not necessarily produce a real picture of bacterial diversity, the future application of non-culture approaches will enrich knowledge on methylotrophic diversity in this environment. In future inoculation experiments, we intend to detect the isolates of methylotrophic bacteria that may stimulate the growth of N. macrocephala, particularly in the vulnerable juvenile stage.
  46 in total

1.  Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice.

Authors:  Claudia Knief; Nathanaël Delmotte; Samuel Chaffron; Manuel Stark; Gerd Innerebner; Reiner Wassmann; Christian von Mering; Julia A Vorholt
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Active methylotrophs in the sediments of Lonar Lake, a saline and alkaline ecosystem formed by meteor impact.

Authors:  Chakkiath Paul Antony; Deepak Kumaresan; Lucia Ferrando; Rich Boden; Hélène Moussard; Ana Fernández Scavino; Yogesh S Shouche; J Colin Murrell
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Cloning, expression, and sequence analysis of the Bacillus methanolicus C1 methanol dehydrogenase gene.

Authors:  G E de Vries; N Arfman; P Terpstra; L Dijkhuizen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Isolation and characterization of a newly isolated pyrene-degrading Acinetobacter strain USTB-X.

Authors:  Haiyan Yuan; Jun Yao; Kanaji Masakorala; Fei Wang; Minmin Cai; Chan Yu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  [Functionality of the xoxF Gene in Methylobacterium dichloromethanicum DM4].

Authors:  Yu E Firsova; M L Torgonskaya; Yu A Trotsenko
Journal:  Mikrobiologiia       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

6.  Dimethylsulfone as a growth substrate for novel methylotrophic species of Hyphomicrobium and Arthrobacter.

Authors:  E Borodina; D P Kelly; F A Rainey; N L Ward-Rainey; A P Wood
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.552

7.  Molecular structure and gene analysis of Ce3+ -induced methanol dehydrogenase of Bradyrhizobium sp. MAFF211645.

Authors:  Nanung Agus Fitriyanto; Mako Fushimi; Mika Matsunaga; Ambar Pertiwiningrum; Tomonori Iwama; Keiichi Kawai
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Environmental proteomics of microbial plankton in a highly productive coastal upwelling system.

Authors:  Sarah M Sowell; Paul E Abraham; Manesh Shah; Nathan C Verberkmoes; Daniel P Smith; Douglas F Barofsky; Stephen J Giovannoni
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Comparative transcriptomics in three Methylophilaceae species uncover different strategies for environmental adaptation.

Authors:  Alexey Vorobev; David A C Beck; Marina G Kalyuzhnaya; Mary E Lidstrom; Ludmila Chistoserdova
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 10.  Prerequisites for amplicon pyrosequencing of microbial methanol utilizers in the environment.

Authors:  Steffen Kolb; Astrid Stacheter
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Metals and Methanotrophy.

Authors:  Jeremy D Semrau; Alan A DiSpirito; Wenyu Gu; Sukhwan Yoon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Possible cross-feeding pathway of facultative methylotroph Methyloceanibacter caenitepidi Gela4 on methanotroph Methylocaldum marinum S8.

Authors:  Mio Takeuchi; Haruka Ozaki; Satoshi Hiraoka; Yoichi Kamagata; Susumu Sakata; Hideyoshi Yoshioka; Wataru Iwasaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Cultivation Renaissance in the Post-Metagenomics Era: Combining the New and Old.

Authors:  Hideyuki Tamaki
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Polyphasic characterization of Delftia acidovorans ESM-1, a facultative methylotrophic bacterium isolated from rhizosphere of Eruca sativa.

Authors:  Ashraf Y Z Khalifa; M AlMalki
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Loci Identification of a N-acyl Homoserine Lactone Type Quorum Sensing System and a New LysR-type Transcriptional Regulator Associated with Antimicrobial Activity and Swarming in Burkholderia Gladioli UAPS07070.

Authors:  E Seynos-García; M Castañeda-Lucio; J Muñoz-Rojas; L López-Pliego; M Villalobos; R Bustillos-Cristales; L E Fuentes-Ramírez
Journal:  Open Life Sci       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 0.938

6.  Phyllosphere bacterial assembly in citrus crop under conventional and ecological management.

Authors:  Carolinne R Carvalho; Armando Cf Dias; Sérgio K Homma; Elke Jbn Cardoso
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.