Literature DB >> 28855386

Human movement, cooperation and the effectiveness of coordinated vector control strategies.

Chris M Stone1,2, Samantha R Schwab3, Dina M Fonseca4, Nina H Fefferman2.   

Abstract

Vector-borne disease transmission is often typified by highly focal transmission and influenced by movement of hosts and vectors across different scales. The ecological and environmental conditions (including those created by humans through vector control programmes) that result in metapopulation dynamics remain poorly understood. The development of control strategies that would most effectively limit outbreaks given such dynamics is particularly urgent given the recent epidemics of dengue, chikungunya and Zika viruses. We developed a stochastic, spatial model of vector-borne disease transmission, allowing for movement of hosts between patches. Our model is applicable to arbovirus transmission by Aedes aegypti in urban settings and was parametrized to capture Zika virus transmission in particular. Using simulations, we investigated the extent to which two aspects of vector control strategies are affected by human commuting patterns: the extent of coordination and cooperation between neighbouring communities. We find that transmission intensity is highest at intermediate levels of host movement. The extent to which coordination of control activities among neighbouring patches decreases the prevalence of infection is affected by both how frequently humans commute and the proportion of neighbouring patches that commits to vector surveillance and control activities. At high levels of host movement, patches that do not contribute to vector control may act as sources of infection in the landscape, yet have comparable levels of prevalence as patches that do cooperate. This result suggests that real cooperation among neighbours will be critical to the development of effective pro-active strategies for vector-borne disease control in today's commuter-linked communities.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aedes aegypti; Zika virus; commuting patterns; larval control; metapopulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28855386      PMCID: PMC5582128          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  47 in total

Review 1.  The first releases of transgenic mosquitoes: an argument for the sterile insect technique.

Authors:  Mark Q Benedict; Alan S Robinson
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2003-08

2.  Heterogeneities in the transmission of infectious agents: implications for the design of control programs.

Authors:  M E Woolhouse; C Dye; J F Etard; T Smith; J D Charlwood; G P Garnett; P Hagan; J L Hii; P D Ndhlovu; R J Quinnell; C H Watts; S K Chandiwana; R M Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Zika and chikungunya: mosquito-borne viruses in a changing world.

Authors:  Talya Shragai; Blanka Tesla; Courtney Murdock; Laura C Harrington
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Superior reproductive success on human blood without sugar is not limited to highly anthropophilic mosquito species.

Authors:  M A H Braks; S A Juliano; L P Lounibos
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.739

5.  A major epidemic of chikungunya virus infection on Reunion Island, France, 2005-2006.

Authors:  Philippe Renault; Jean-Louis Solet; Daouda Sissoko; Elsa Balleydier; Sophie Larrieu; Laurent Filleul; Christian Lassalle; Julien Thiria; Emmanuelle Rachou; Henriette de Valk; Daniele Ilef; Martine Ledrans; Isabelle Quatresous; Philippe Quenel; Vincent Pierre
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  Socially structured human movement shapes dengue transmission despite the diffusive effect of mosquito dispersal.

Authors:  Robert C Reiner; Steven T Stoddard; Thomas W Scott
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 7.  Eradication versus control for poliomyelitis: an economic analysis.

Authors:  Kimberly M Thompson; Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-04-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  A critical assessment of vector control for dengue prevention.

Authors:  Nicole L Achee; Fred Gould; T Alex Perkins; Robert C Reiner; Amy C Morrison; Scott A Ritchie; Duane J Gubler; Remy Teyssou; Thomas W Scott
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2015-05-07

9.  Comparative Analysis of Dengue and Zika Outbreaks Reveals Differences by Setting and Virus.

Authors:  Sebastian Funk; Adam J Kucharski; Anton Camacho; Rosalind M Eggo; Laith Yakob; Lawrence M Murray; W John Edmunds
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-12-07

10.  Heterogeneity, mixing, and the spatial scales of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission.

Authors:  T Alex Perkins; Thomas W Scott; Arnaud Le Menach; David L Smith
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  4 in total

1.  The dynamics of evolutionary rescue from a novel pathogen threat in a host metapopulation.

Authors:  Jing Jiao; Nina Fefferman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Contrasting the value of targeted versus area-wide mosquito control scenarios to limit arbovirus transmission with human mobility patterns based on different tropical urban population centers.

Authors:  Chris M Stone; Samantha R Schwab; Dina M Fonseca; Nina H Fefferman
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-07-03

3.  Correlation of the basic reproduction number (R0) and eco-environmental variables in Colombian municipalities with chikungunya outbreaks during 2014-2016.

Authors:  Víctor Hugo Peña-García; Rebecca C Christofferson
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-11-07

4.  A general modeling framework for exploring the impact of individual concern and personal protection on vector-borne disease dynamics.

Authors:  Kimberlyn Roosa; Nina H Fefferman
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.047

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.