Literature DB >> 28854785

Direct Contact Sorptive Extraction: A Robust Method for Sampling Plant Volatiles in the Field.

Nicole Kfoury1, Eric Scott1, Colin Orians1, Albert Robbat1.   

Abstract

Plants produce volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with diverse structures and functions, which change in response to environmental stimuli and have important consequences for interactions with other organisms. To understand these changes, in situ sampling is necessary. In contrast to dynamic headspace (DHS), which is the most often employed method, direct contact sampling employing a magnetic stir bar held in place by a magnet eliminates artifacts produced by enclosing plant materials in glass or plastic chambers. Direct-contact sorptive extraction (DCSE) using polydimethylsiloxane coated stir bars (Twisters) coated stir bars is more sensitive than DHS, captures a wider range of compounds, minimizes VOC collection from neighboring plants, and distinguishes the effects of herbivory in controlled and field conditions. Because DCSE is relatively inexpensive and simple to employ, scalability of field trials can be expanded concomitant with increased sample replication. The sensitivity of DCSE combined with the spectral deconvolution data analysis software makes the two ideal for comprehensive, in situ profiling of plant volatiles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GC/MS; direct contact sorptive extraction (DCSE); in situ sampling; metabolomics; plant VOCs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28854785     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  8 in total

1.  Using the right tool for the job: the difference between unsupervised and supervised analyses of multivariate ecological data.

Authors:  Eric R Scott; Elizabeth E Crone
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Tools in the Investigation of Volatile Semiochemicals on Insects: From Sampling to Statistical Analysis.

Authors:  Ricardo Barbosa-Cornelio; Fernando Cantor; Ericsson Coy-Barrera; Daniel Rodríguez
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  Grass-like plants release general volatile cues attractive for gravid Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto mosquitoes.

Authors:  Getachew E Bokore; Linus Svenberg; Richard Tamre; Patrick Onyango; Tullu Bukhari; Åsa Emmer; Ulrike Fillinger
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 4.  Emerging Methods of Monitoring Volatile Organic Compounds for Detection of Plant Pests and Disease.

Authors:  Samantha MacDougall; Fatih Bayansal; Ali Ahmadi
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13

5.  Elicitor-Induced VOC Emission by Grapevine Leaves: Characterisation in the Vineyard.

Authors:  Christelle Lemaitre-Guillier; Agnès Chartier; Christelle Dufresne; Antonin Douillet; Stéphanie Cluzet; Josep Valls; Nicolas Aveline; Xavier Daire; Marielle Adrian
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 6.  Stress-Induced Volatile Emissions and Signalling in Inter-Plant Communication.

Authors:  Joanah Midzi; David W Jeffery; Ute Baumann; Suzy Rogiers; Stephen D Tyerman; Vinay Pagay
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29

7.  Changes in Tea Plant Secondary Metabolite Profiles as a Function of Leafhopper Density and Damage.

Authors:  Eric R Scott; Xin Li; Ji-Peng Wei; Nicole Kfoury; Joshua Morimoto; Ming-Ming Guo; Amma Agyei; Albert Robbat; Selena Ahmed; Sean B Cash; Timothy S Griffin; John R Stepp; Wen-Yan Han; Colin M Orians
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  A comparison of semi-quantitative methods suitable for establishing volatile profiles.

Authors:  Victoria Ruiz-Hernández; María José Roca; Marcos Egea-Cortines; Julia Weiss
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.993

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.