D F Hoft1,2, M Xia1, G L Zhang3, A Blazevic1, J Tennant1, C Kaplan4, G Matuschak4, T J Dube5, H Hill5, L S Schlesinger6, P L Andersen7, V Brusic3,8. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Allergy & Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA. 2. Department of Molecular Microbiology & Immunology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA. 3. Computer Science Department, Metropolitan College, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA. 5. Emmes Corporation, Rockville Pike, Maryland, USA. 6. Center for Microbial Interface Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 7. Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark. 8. School of Medicine and Bioinformatics Center, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Khazakstan.
Abstract
Protective efficacy of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) may be affected by the methods and routes of vaccine administration. We have studied the safety and immunogenicity of oral (PO) and/or intradermal (ID) administration of BCG in healthy human subjects. No major safety concerns were detected in the 68 healthy adults vaccinated with PO and/or ID BCG. Although both PO and ID BCG could induce systemic Th1 responses capable of IFN-γ production, ID BCG more strongly induced systemic Th1 responses. In contrast, stronger mucosal responses (TB-specific secretory IgA and bronchoalveolar lavage T cells) were induced by PO BCG vaccination. To generate preliminary data comparing the early gene signatures induced by mucosal and systemic BCG vaccination, CD4+ memory T cells were isolated from subsets of BCG vaccinated subjects pre- (Day 0) and post-vaccination (Days 7 and 56), rested or stimulated with BCG infected dendritic cells, and then studied by Illumina BeadArray transcriptomal analysis. Notably, distinct gene expression profiles were identified both on Day 7 and Day 56 comparing the PO and ID BCG vaccinated groups by GSEA analysis. Future correlation analyses between specific gene expression patterns and distinct mucosal and systemic immune responses induced will be highly informative for TB vaccine development.
RCT Entities:
Protective efficacy of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) may be affected by the methods and routes of vaccine administration. We have studied the safety and immunogenicity of oral (PO) and/or intradermal (ID) administration of BCG in healthy human subjects. No major safety concerns were detected in the 68 healthy adults vaccinated with PO and/or ID BCG. Although both PO and ID BCG could induce systemic Th1 responses capable of IFN-γ production, ID BCG more strongly induced systemic Th1 responses. In contrast, stronger mucosal responses (TB-specific secretory IgA and bronchoalveolar lavage T cells) were induced by PO BCG vaccination. To generate preliminary data comparing the early gene signatures induced by mucosal and systemic BCG vaccination, CD4+ memory T cells were isolated from subsets of BCG vaccinated subjects pre- (Day 0) and post-vaccination (Days 7 and 56), rested or stimulated with BCG infected dendritic cells, and then studied by Illumina BeadArray transcriptomal analysis. Notably, distinct gene expression profiles were identified both on Day 7 and Day 56 comparing the PO and ID BCG vaccinated groups by GSEA analysis. Future correlation analyses between specific gene expression patterns and distinct mucosal and systemic immune responses induced will be highly informative for TB vaccine development.
Over one-third of the world’s population is currently infected with
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), and more than 1.5 million
individuals die of tuberculosis (TB) each year.(1) The current TB vaccine, the attenuated Mycobacterium
bovis strain Bacillus of Calmette and Guerin (BCG), is
effective at preventing disseminated forms of TB in very young children. (2, 3)
However, the efficacy in prevention of adult pulmonary TB, the major form of
transmissible disease, at best is only 50%.(4) Intradermal (ID) administration is the major route of BCG vaccination
worldwide, but this vaccination method is unlikely to induce optimal lung mucosal
immunity.(5, 6) We hypothesize that combining systemic and mucosal TB
vaccinations may induce not only systemic immunity protective against the worst
forms of disseminated TB disease, but also mucosal immunity protective against
initial TB infection and/or secondary transmission. We have initiated a series of
BCG vaccination trials with the overall goal of identifying the major human immune
responses that BCG does and does not induce, and to determine the immune responses
new and improved TB vaccines must stimulate to provide better protection than ID
BCG. An additional goal of our ongoing work is to investigate the possibility that
mucosal BCG vaccination can uniquely induce immune responses relevant for optimal
lung mucosal TB immunity. Because oral (PO) BCG vaccination was the original route
used by Calmette and Guerin,(3) and millions
of persons have been vaccinated with BCG orally in Brazil over the past 50
years,(7) there are considerable safety
data to support the use of PO BCG in humans.(8) In addition, activated memory T and B lymphocytes have been shown to
develop differentiation programs allowing them to circulate and home to multiple
different mucosal tissues, indicating that PO vaccines could induce increased
immunity at distant mucosal sites.(9–11) Administration of
ID and/or PO BCG in ongoing research protocols allows for comparison of the mucosal
and systemic TB-specific immune responses induced with current and alternative
methods of vaccine administration. We report here the first detailed analysis of
human immune responses induced by ID and/or PO BCG. Our results support the
hypothesis that a combined ID and PO BCG vaccination approach could induce the best
combination of mucosal and systemic TB immunity.Recent studies have used systems biology approaches to obtain a global
picture of the immune responses to vaccination in humans.(12–16)
Systems biology tools have enabled the identification of early innate signatures
that predict the immunogenicity of vaccines, and identification of potentially novel
mechanisms of immune regulation. In this work we have taken a novel systems biology
approach focusing on the identification of gene expression networks involved in the
induction of CD4+ T cells, critically important for optimal mucosal and
systemic TB immunity. Our preliminary data indicate that PO and ID BCG induce
distinct profiles of molecular signatures, suggesting that more detailed analyses
will identify genes and/or gene networks that should be differentially targeted by
vaccines designed to induce both optimal mucosal and systemic TB immunity.
Results
Summary of enrollment, safety and determination of optimal PO BCG Danish
dose
All 16 subjects enrolled into the initial Danish BCG PO dose escalation
trial completed 6 months of observation, and none developed any significant
adverse events. Optimal BCG-specific blood T cell IFN-γ responses and
nasal wash MtbLAM-specific sIgA responses post-vaccination were detected in
subjects given 2×108 cfu of Danish BCG PO (data not shown).
In the double-blind, placebo controlled trial, 60 subjects were randomized among
the groups A–F (10/group) (see Figure
1 and Supplementary
Figure 1). In addition, 8 subjects were enrolled into an open label
arm (group G) who received 2×106 cfu of Connaught BCG
intradermally. All 68 subjects received their initial BCG vaccinations as
planned, 63 subjects were followed for at least 6 months after the initial
vaccinations, 43 received second vaccinations 1 year later (20 received BCG
revaccination and 23 received placebo 1 year after the first vaccinations), and
48 completed 2 years of follow up. The number of drop outs during the second
year reduced sample sizes to less than optimal for detection of significant
increases in the immunogenicity parameters induced by the booster BCG
vaccinations. Therefore, for most immunogenicity results presented below, groups
A+B, C+D and E+F were combined based on the type of BCG
vaccination given at the beginning of the trial. Only limited comparisons
between group G and the other groups are shown because of the smaller sample
size in group G, further reduction in sample size due to drop outs, and the lack
of meaningful differences detected between groups A+B (given ID Danish
BCG) and group G. However, some group G subjects were recruited into a BAL study
and these results are presented along with the results from all other groups. No
deaths or other significant adverse events (SAE) occurred during these trials.
There were no severe AEs caused by vaccination except for in 1 subject (ID BCG
alone/Group A) who developed transient erythema at the ID vaccination site
graded as severe by size. This severe graded erythema did not interfere with the
subject’s normal activities and was not associated with any other
symptoms. There were eleven moderate related unsolicited adverse events, nine of
which occurred post vaccination 1. Seven of these events, experienced by
subjects in all Groups except PO BCG alone (groups C + D), were
described as continued reactogenicity. The remaining four events, experienced by
subjects in ID BCG alone, PO BCG alone and combined ID and PO groups (1 subject
in each of the following groups: A, B, C and E), included: appetite loss, upper
respiratory infection, URI and mandibular pain. Overall, these results indicate
that no safety signals were detected in this small trial.
Figure 1
Overview schematic of the clinical trial
Ten subjects were recruited into each of the groups A–F, randomized in a
double blind fashion to receive PO vs ID vs PO+ID Danish BCG. An
additional 8 subjects were recruited into an open label, ID Connaught BCG
vaccination cohort (to compare ID immunity induced by Danish vs Connaught BCG).
During year 1 of the trial, groups A and B were identical (given only ID BCG),
groups C and D were identical (given only PO BCG), and groups E and F were
identical (given both ID and PO BCG). Blood, tear, nasal wash and stool samples
were collected at 9 different time points (pre-vaccination, and 1 week, 2
months, 6 months, 12 months, 12 months plus 1 week, 14 months, 18 months and 24
months post-vaccination).
*10 volunteers/group
Mtb-specific lymphoproliferative responses were induced most strongly by ID
BCG
Supplementary Figure
2.A. presents the mean ± standard error (SE) peripheral blood
lymphoproliferative responses induced in all subjects regardless of group
assignment over the 2 years of follow up. BCG significantly increased
(p<0.05) Mtb-specific T cell responses that persisted for at least 2 years
after vaccination. Lymphoproliferative responses specific for a single major Mtb
secreted protein (Ag85B), and for all Mtb secreted proteins present in culture
filtrates (CF) of logarithmically replicating extracellular Mtb organisms
in vitro, were both significantly increased
post-vaccination. Figure 2 shows
lymphoproliferative responses induced by these same Mtb antigen preparations
(Ag85B and Mtb CF in 2.A. and 2.B., respectively) during the 1st year
post-vaccination for subjects given ID BCG alone (groups A+B), PO BCG
alone (groups C+D) and both ID and PO BCG (groups E+F). Median
responses for each are shown at the different time points. These latter results
demonstrate that all 3 BCG vaccination strategies resulted in at least some
increased Mtb-specific lymphoproliferative responses. However, only subjects
given ID BCG (with or without PO BCG) developed significantly higher
post-vaccination responses.
Heparinized whole blood samples were diluted with medium 10 fold and stimulated
with either the major secreted Ag85 protein (Panel A.) or Mtb culture filtrate
(CF, complex lysate of all Mtb antigens secreted by exponentially growing
organisms, Panel B.), and tritiated thymidine incorporation measured on day 7.
Median values for each group (N=20) are shown for each time point.
*p<0.05, **p<0.01 by Wilcoxon matched pairs
testing compared with pre-vaccination responses.
Mtb-specific IFN-γ-producing T cells were most strongly induced by ID
BCG
Supplementary Figure
2.B. presents the mean ± SE peripheral blood IFN-γ
ELISPOT responses induced, as an overall assessment of Mtb-specific type 1
immune responses, in all subjects regardless of group assignment over the 2
years of follow up. BCG vaccination also significantly increased Mtb-specific
type 1 T cells that persisted for at least 2 years after vaccination.
IFN-γ responses specific for the major secreted protein, Ag85B, and for
all Mtb CF secreted proteins, were both significantly increased
post-vaccination. Figure 3 shows
IFN-γ ELISPOT responses induced by Ag85B and Mtb CF (3.A. and 3.B.,
respectively) during the 1st year post-vaccination for subjects given
ID BCG alone (groups A+B), PO BCG alone (groups C+D) and both ID
and PO BCG (groups E+F). Median responses are depicted for each group at
the different time points. It can be seen that only the groups given ID BCG
(with or without PO BCG) developed significantly increased Mtb-specific
IFN-γ responses post-vaccination (by Wilcoxon matched pairs test). Table I further confirms these results
demonstrating that significantly increased proportions of subjects in the groups
given ID BCG developed positive IFN-γ responses post-vaccination
(defined as a response greater than the mean plus 2 SE of all baseline
responses; all significant differences detected are presented). In 5 different
comparisons of antigen-specific responses at both early and late time points, ID
groups had significantly higher proportions of responders than PO recipients.
Furthermore, 2 comparisons indicated that combined ID plus PO BCG vaccination
induced higher proportions of positive IFN-γ responses than PO BCG
alone, providing additional support for the conclusion that ID BCG induces
stronger systemic TB-specific immunity than PO BCG. Two comparisons indicated
that ID BCG alone induced higher proportions of responders than ID plus PO,
perhaps because more T cells were recruited out of the blood and into the
peripheral mucosal tissues, due to the higher doses of BCG given PO (40 fold
more BCG cfu were used for PO compared with ID vaccination).
Freshly harvested PBMC were studied in IFN-γ ELISPOT plates stimulated
with an Ag85 overlapping peptide pool (Panel A.) or Mtb CF (Panel B.). Median
values for each group (N=20) are shown for each time point.
*p<0.05, **p<0.01 by Wilcoxon matched pairs
testing compared with pre-vaccination responses.
Table I
Significant differences in proportions positive in IFN-γ ELISPOT
assays
%
Responders
Fisher exact test p
value
Antigen
Day
ID
PO
PO+ID
IDvsPO
IDvsPO+ID
PO+IDvsPO
rAg85B
180
35
6
0
0.048
0.011
1.000
rAg85B
730
33
0
15
0.028
0.412
0.480
Ag85Bp
7
75
41
42
0.050
0.054
1.000
Ag85Bp
56
65
37
28
0.113
0.028
0.728
Ag85Bp
730
44
0
15
0.010
0.129
0.480
Mtb CF
7
35
12
47
0.137
0.523
0.031
Mtb CF
56
55
26
67
0.105
0.522
0.022
Mtb CF
421
39
0
23
0.024
0.452
0.220
Note: All significant differences comparing groups for responses to all
antigens, at all timepoints pre- and post-vaccination are listed here. All
statistically significant differences found involved greater responses in
the groups given ID BCG compared with the group given only PO BCG, or the
responses in the group given ID BCG alone higher than in the group given
PO+ID BCG. Corrections for multiple comparisons were not done
because of the small sample sizes.
Mucosal Mtb-specific sIgA responses were most strongly induced by PO
BCG
We studied Mtb-derived lipoarabinomannan (LAM)-specific sIgA in stool,
nasal wash and tear samples pre- and post-vaccination, as a marker of
BCG-induced mucosal immunity. As reported previously(17), we were unable to measure vaccine-induced,
LAM-specific sIgA responses in stool samples, presumably due to dilutional and
proteolytic effects known to occur as sIgA is transported to the distal gut.
However, in nasal wash samples (Figure
4.A.) and tears (Figure 4.B.),
relative increases in MtbLAM-specific sIgA were seen post-vaccination in the
groups that had received PO BCG, but not in the group given only ID BCG. These
relative increases compared to Day 0 seen in the PO BCG vaccination groups did
not achieve statistical significance (by Wilcoxon matched pairs tests), probably
because of the small sample sizes. However, our previous data generated from 2
PO BCG dose escalation trials demonstrated that PO BCG can induce TB-specific
sIgA responses(9, 17). These results indicate that PO BCG can uniquely
induce mucosal immune responses relevant for TB immunity.
Figure 4
Mtb-specific secretory IgA results
Nasal wash (Panel A.) and tear (Panel B.) samples were obtained and studied in
Mtb lipoarabinomannan (LAM) coated ELISA plates. In both cases, subjects given
PO BCG were found to have higher Mtb LAM-specific sIgA detected. Each group
(N=20).
Mtb-specific T cells were increased in the lungs of subjects given PO
BCG
As a sub-study to the main BCG vaccination protocol, we performed BAL on
16 consenting subjects (5 received ID Danish BCG alone, 3 received ID Connaught
BCG alone, 6 received PO Danish BCG alone, and 2 received both ID and PO Danish
BCG), 1–12 months after the initial vaccinations. BAL cells were
collected and studied by both IFN-γ ELISPOT and flow cytometric methods.
We stimulated the BAL cells with Ag85B peptides, PPD and live BCG as previously
described.(18) The results from two
subjects were excluded from analysis because the low viability of recovered BAL
cells resulted in no response even to the positive controls, and the few
negative values obtained were replaced with “0”. Figure 5.A. shows that similar circulating blood
lymphocyte IFN-γ responses were detected comparing all subjects given ID
BCG alone and all subjects given PO BCG with or without ID BCG. Despite similar
circulating blood lymphocyte responses, Figure
5.B. demonstrates that up to 6-fold more Mtb-specific T cells were
found in the airways of subjects who received PO BCG compared with subjects
given only ID BCG. Figure panels 5.A. and 5.B. present separate symbols for
individual subjects given ID Danish BCG only (blue circles), ID Connaught BCG
only (purple triangles), PO Danish BCG only (orange circles) and ID plus PO
Danish BCG (green squares). Trends for increased immunogenicity of ID Connaught
BCG compared with ID Danish BCG, and increased immunogenicity of ID plus PO
Danish BCG compared with PO Danish BCG alone, can be observed both with blood
lymphocytes and BAL cells. However, these trends (additional variables) do not
alter our overall conclusions that ID BCG induced similar or stronger blood
responses than PO BCG, while PO BCG induced stronger BAL responses. Furthermore,
both ID BCG alone and PO ± ID BCG induced significant increases in
Mtb-specific blood responses compared with the matched medium rest background
responses for the same group, while only PO ± ID BCG induced significant
increases in Mtb-specific BAL responses compared with medium rest (p<0.05 by
Wilcoxon matched pairs testing).
Figure 5
Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) sub-study to identify lung TB-specific T
cells
A sub-study targeting subjects enrolled in the parent DMID-01-351 trial was
conducted involving a single post-vaccination BAL procedure and blood sample
obtained the same day. Panels A. and B. show IFN-γ ELISPOT results for
PBMC and BAL cells, respectively. Box-plots with scatter plot overlay are
presented for PBMC and BAL cells. Panel C. shows flow cytometric studies
identifying the percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing
α4β1 in PBMC. Panel D. shows flow cytometric studies identifying
the percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing CXCR3 among
BAL cells. *p<0.05 by Mann-Whitney testing compared with group
responses.
We also studied T cell surface expression of α4β1 and
CXCR3, known to be involved in immune trafficking to the lung. In Figure 5.C., we show that the proportions of
circulating blood CD8+ T cells expressing the integrin complex
α4β1 were significantly increased in subjects vaccinated with PO
BCG. In Figure 5.D., we demonstrate that
significantly increased proportions of lung CD4+ and CD8+ T
cells in subjects given PO BCG expressed CXCR3, a chemokine receptor previously
implicated in lung trafficking of antigen-specific T cells.(19, 20) These
results indicate that PO BCG can increase the numbers of circulating blood T
cells that express α4β1 suggesting that assessment of
circulating α4β1+ T cells may be useful as a biomarker
of the induction of mucosal responses. In addition, the expression of CXCR3 on
lung airway T cells may be useful as a biomarker of recent lung trafficking.
Cutaneous PPD-specific DTH responses were induced only by ID BCG
We previously reported that PO BCG skewed Mtb-specific T cells toward
mucosal homing and reduced cutaneous homing manifest as significantly reduced
PPD-specific DTH reactivity in PO compared with ID BCG recipients.(21) At the end of the 2 years of
observation, we performed 5 TU PPD skin tests and found, as reported before,
that there was a significantly greater proportion of subjects given ID BCG with
positive PPD responses (≥ 10 mm) compared with subjects given PO BCG
(9/18 vs 0/13, respectively, p<0.05 by Fisher’s exact 2-sided test).
Only 3 of 13 given ID and PO BCG had positive PPD responses at the end of the
trial, also consistent with negative effects of PO BCG on PPD-specific DTH.
These results confirm our previous studies indicating that ID and PO BCG program
vaccine-induced T cells for differential cutaneous vs mucosal homing
programs.(22)
ID and PO BCG induced distinct memory CD4+ T cell transcriptomal
responses
Because we found unique mucosal and systemic immune responses induced by
PO and ID BCG, respectively, we performed additional studies of the CD4+
T cell transcriptomes present post-vaccination. We hypothesized that distinct
individual genes and gene networks important for differential mucosal and
systemic immune responses would be induced by the different routes of
vaccination. We compared vaccine-induced transcriptomal changes at the predicted
peak of post-vaccination T cell activation (Day 7 post-vaccination), and at an
early memory time point (Day 56 post-vaccination). We focused on comparisons of
transcriptomes at Day 7 directly ex vivo without further
in vitro stimulation to restrict our studies to the ongoing
responses induced in vivo. However, at Day 56 we assumed that
memory T cells would be past the peak of in vivo activation and
require further stimulation in vitro to identify differences
induced by PO and ID BCG vaccination. Figure
6 shows the results of our preliminary transcriptomal investigations.
Panel A. shows individual heat maps for the top 100 most significantly altered
genes comparing Day 0 and Day 7 responses directly ex vivo
(without re-stimulation with BCG-infected dendritic cells), in CD4+ T
cells from the PO and ID BCG vaccinated subjects. The Venn diagram in Panel B.
demonstrates that the Day 7 differentially expressed genes were largely distinct
comparing subjects given PO and ID BCG vaccination. Panel C. shows individual
heat maps for the top 100 most differentially expressed genes comparing Day 0
and Day 56 responses after in vitro re-stimulation with
BCG-infected autologous dendritic cells, in CD4+ T cells from PO and ID
BCG vaccinated subjects. The Venn diagram in Panel D. demonstrates that similar
to Day 7 responses, the Day 56 differentially expressed genes were largely
distinct comparing subjects given PO and ID BCG vaccination. These results
provide strong evidence that PO and ID BCG induce very different transcriptomal
patterns in humanCD4+ T cells important for differential induction and
persistence of mucosal and systemic TB immunity.
Figure 6
CD4+ T cell transcriptomal differences induced by PO and ID
BCG
Memory CD4+ T cells were purified from PBMC harvested pre-vaccination, 7
days post-vaccination and 56 days post-vaccination from 11 subjects (4 given PO
BCG and 7 given ID BCG). Autologous dendritic cells (DC) were generated from
blood monocytes and infected or not with BCG. The 3 different serial memory
CD4+ T cell populations were cultured for 24 hours with uninfected or
BCG-infected DC, and then RNA harvested for Illumina BeadArray transcriptomal
analysis. Panel A. shows heat maps for the top 100 altered genes comparing day 7
and day 0 direct ex vivo responses (PO N=4 and ID
N=7). Panel B. shows that only 3 of the top altered genes detected at
day 7 were the same in PO vs ID BCG recipients. Panel C. shows heat maps for the
top altered genes comparing day 56 and day 0 after re-stimulation with
BCG-infected DC (PO N=4 and ID N=7). Panel D. shows that only 2
of the top altered genes detected at day 56 were the same in PO vs ID BCG
recipients.
Discussion
Our major original hypothesis was that the combination of mucosal and
systemic BCG vaccination would induce the optimal combination of mucosal and
systemic TB-specific immune responses important for TB protective immunity. Overall
the results of this trial support this conclusion by indicating that PO BCG induced
stronger mucosal responses and ID BCG induced stronger systemic immune responses.
Furthermore, the combination of PO and ID BCG resulted in both increases in mucosal
and systemic immune responses. In addition, no major safety signals were identified,
further supporting the rationale for additional studies of mucosal BCG
vaccination.ID BCG vaccination induced stronger and more reproducible systemic immune
responses compared with PO BCG vaccination. Positive response rates post-vaccination
in both PBMC IFN-γ ELISPOT and lymphoproliferative assays, were greater in
subjects given ID compared with PO BCG. Numerous examples of ID recipients
developing significantly higher response rates than PO recipients were seen in these
assays that measure functional characteristics of systemic CD4+ T helper
type 1 responses thought to be critical for TB protective immunity. In Figure 3A, groups E+F are shown to have
increased responses at Day 7, but then the responses are decreased. The increased
responses at Day 7 in subjects given both PO+ID BCG suggest early induction
of T cells, but these induced T cells may traffic to mucosal peripheral sites
leading to decreased numbers of T cells circulating in the blood.PO BCG vaccination induced stronger/more reproducible mucosal secretory IgA
responses compared with ID BCG vaccination. Positive response rates in the
LAM-specific secretory IgA responses detected in nasal wash and tear specimens
collected post-vaccination were higher in subjects given PO BCG compared with ID BCG
alone. These relative increases compared to Day 0 seen in the PO BCG vaccination
groups did not achieve statistical significance (by Wilcoxon matched pairs tests),
probably because of the small sample sizes. However, combined with our previously
published data from PO dose escalation trials reporting that PO BCG can
significantly increase TB-specific sIgA responses,(9, 17) our current results
further support the unique induction of nasal wash and tear sIgA responses by PO
BCG. In contrast, despite these results, the stool secretory IgA responses were not
increased in PO BCG recipients. Initially, this might seem surprising because the PO
BCG delivery is expected to induce gut mucosal immunity after being taken up by
mucosal immune inductive sites within the Peyer’s patches lining the small
bowel. However, our current negative results for stool secretory IgA after PO BCG
are similar to the findings in our 2 previous PO BCG trials, in which we have not
detected post-vaccination increases in stool secretory IgA responses. Stool contains
a high content of proteases which can degrade secretory IgA over time(23), and the method for collection of stool
samples results in much higher dilutions of stool secretions compared with the
methods for collection of nasal washes and tears.(17) Therefore, stool studies are the least reliable for detection of
mucosal immune responses induced by vaccination compared with other mucosal
secretions. The detection of increased secretory IgA responses in nasal washes and
tears document mucosal immune responses induced by PO BCG, and also demonstrate that
these mucosal immune responses were able to traffic to distant mucosal tissues
including those lining the upper respiratory track, possibly relevant for protection
against TB infection.The comparison of BAL cell and PBMC responses in subjects recruited for the
BAL sub-study demonstrated that PO BCG also induced highly significant increases in
T cell surface markers important for lymphocyte trafficking to the lung. Highly
reproducible and significant increases in both BAL T cell expression of CXCR3 and
PBMC T cell expression of the α4/β1 integrin complex were induced in
subjects given PO with or without ID BCG, compared with those given ID BCG alone.
These T cell surface markers have been shown in numerous model systems to be
important for the trafficking of CD4+ Th1 cells and CD8+ T cells to
the lungs.(6, 11, 20, 24, 25) Both
CD4+ Th1 and CD8+ T cells specific for TB antigens are thought to be
critically important for protective TB immunity.(6) Therefore, the BAL/PBMC sub-study results indicate that PO BCG
induces the potential for more T cells protective against TB to traffic to the site
of initial infection.Also evident in the BAL/PBMC sub-study, PO BCG with or without ID BCG led to
higher BAL overall TB-specific T cell responses in the lungs compared with persons
given only ID BCG. The numbers of antigen-specific BAL T cells producing
IFN-γ after in vitro stimulation with Ag85, PPD and BCG
were 4–6 fold increased in persons given PO with or without ID BCG. The fact
that reproducible increases were detected with all TB antigens used to stimulate T
cell responses in vitro, further supports our conclusion. Despite
the reproducible increases in TB-specific T cells in subjects given PO BCG, the
responses in PBMC obtained from these subjects on the same day as the BAL procedures
were similar in subjects given ID BCG alone and subjects given PO BCG with or
without ID BCG. These latter results provide additional support for the conclusion
that PO BCG uniquely induced increased TB-specific T cells with lung-trafficking
potential. The BAL procedures were done 1–12 months post-vaccination in
these subjects, further indicating the robustness of our findings. These results,
combined with the sIgA and lymphocyte trafficking molecule expression results
discussed above, provide complementary evidence that PO BCG more strongly induces
multiple mucosal immune responses relevant for protective mucosal TB immunity.We have hypothesized previously(21)
that PO BCG induces differential T cell trafficking compared with ID BCG. The above
findings are consistent with this hypothesis. In addition, the PPD-specific
delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses detected in subjects at the end of
this trial support our earlier published results(21) indicating that PO BCG fails to induce PPD-specific DTH responses,
and even may suppress these responses. These results support our earlier conclusion
that PO BCG could provide TB immunity against initial infection without the
induction of PPD-specific delayed type hypersensitivity that can interfere with
detection of latent TB infection and disease.The preliminary CD4+ T cell transcriptomal studies produced
provocative data suggesting that PO and ID BCG vaccination induce distinct profiles
of molecular signatures, which may explain the differences in mucosal and systemic
immune responses induced. The sample size studied in this manner needs to be
expanded with additional stored PBMC to further confirm the validity of our
conclusions, and to allow for studies of correlations between the expression of
specific genes and gene sets and the mucosal and systemic immune responses induced
in this trial. This work is currently ongoing.Further research in this area should focus on at least two major areas to
learn how optimal TB-specific mucosal and systemic immunity can be induced. First,
we have only explored one combined schedule of PO and ID BCG vaccination. Additional
work could investigate the effects of different doses of PO and ID BCG, different
strains of BCG given PO and ID, different sequences of mucosal vs. systemic BCG
vaccination (e.g.-first priming with mucosal vaccination followed at different
intervals by ID vaccination), different routes of mucosal BCG vaccination
(intranasal or aerosolized vaccinations with BCG may induce even stronger
TB-specific lung immunity, although additional safety concerns would need to be
addressed), and mucosal and systemic vaccinations with newer and potentially more
potent TB vaccines. Second, additional studies investigating the molecular events
which drive the induction of optimal mucosal and systemic TB-specific immune
responses are needed to allow further iterative improvements in mucosal and systemic
vaccinations. To this end, the preliminary CD4+ T cell transcriptomal
studies in subjects given PO vs ID BCG vaccination need to be expanded as noted
above.Overall, these results demonstrate that ID BCG induces the strongest
TB-specific systemic immune response, while PO BCG induces the strongest TB-specific
mucosal immune responses. Therefore, these results support our original hypothesis
that mucosal and systemic vaccinations with BCG will induce the optimal combination
of mucosal and systemic immune responses relevant for protection against TBinfection and disease progression. In addition, these results will greatly
facilitate further targeted development of methods for assessing mucosal and
systemic immune responses induced by other TB vaccines.
Methods
Subject enrollment, randomization and follow up
Healthy HIV-negative, HCV-negative, Quantiferon TB-negative adults aged
18–45 without known TB exposure risks or immunosuppression were enrolled
into 2 separate trials. The first (DMID-99-024) involved a bridging dose
escalation trial of Danish 1331 BCG given orally to 16 subjects at 1 of 3 doses:
2×108 cfu, 2×109 cfu or
2×1010 cfu. The second trial (DMID-01-351) involved 68
subjects randomized into a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of Danish
or Connaught BCG given intradermally (ID), orally (PO) or by both routes.
Subjects were randomized to Groups A–F (10/group) to receive Danish SSI
BCG or placebo at Day 0 and 1 year later. To explore the BCG strain specificity of clinical effects and immunogenicity 8 volunteers were enrolled into an open label group given ID Connaught BCG. Each ID BCG dose included
5×105 cfu, and each PO BCG dose included
2×108 cfu. ID BCG was delivered over the deltoid in 0.1
ml of saline. PO BCG was delivered in 60 ml of PBS within 15 minutes after the
subject ingested 150 ml of oral bicarbonate (0.1M) solution given to neutralize
stomach acid. After drinking the BCG, subjects immediately ingested an
additional 150 ml of PBS alone to ensure all BCG was swallowed. Solicited
symptoms were collected for 15 days (Days 0–14) after each vaccination.
Unsolicited adverse events were collected for 2 months after each vaccination.
Serious adverse events were collected through 12 months after the last
vaccination. Immediately before vaccination and at various times after each
vaccination (1 week, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months), samples of serum, nasal
washes, tears and stool were obtained for the assessment of IgG and IgA
responses by ELISA. In addition, PBMC were collected at these same time points
pre- and post-vaccination for analyses of lymphoproliferative, cytokine ELISPOT
and transcriptomal assays. As a sub-study, bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar
lavage (BAL) were performed on a subset of subjects at 1–12 months
following the primary and/or secondary vaccination.
Lymphoproliferation
Whole blood samples were diluted 10 fold with RPMI and expanded with
optimal doses of recombinant Ag85b protein, Mtb culture filtrate which was
derived from the H37Rv strain and contains most of the secreted proteins from
the organism (BEI Resources), PPD, live BCG, or rested in medium for 7 days at
37°C in 5% CO2. During the last 10–14 hours,
these cultures were pulsed with tritiated thymidine and cell-incorporated
radioactivity measured. The results are presented as disintegrations per minute
(dpm) of radioactivity.
IFN-γ ELISPOT
IFN-γ producing cells were identified by ELISPOT using
ImmunoSpot plates (Cellular Technology, Ltd., Cleveland, OH) and
IFN-γ-specific antibodies (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). PBMC or total
bronchoalveolar lavage cells (0.2–1×105 cells/well)
were stimulated with Ag85b peptide pools (1 μg/ml), recombinant Ag85b
protein (5 μg/ml), Mtb culture filtrate (5 μg/ml, BEI) live BCG
(0.5 MOI) or medium alone for 24 hours at 37°C with 5%
CO2. Spots were identified by CTL Analyzer and ImmunoSpot
software, version 3.2 (C.T.L.).
Secretory IgA (sIgA) ELISA
Nasal washes, tears and stool samples were collected as described
previously.(17) Immulon 2 plates were
coated with 4 μg/ml of lipoarabinomannanH37RaLAM
(provided by Dr. Larry Schlesinger, Ohio State University) diluted in
100% ethanol. The plates were dried for 3–4 hours in a fume hood
then washed with PBS plus 0.05% tween 20. Plates were blocked overnight
at 4°C with 1% BSA in PBS with 0.05% tween 20. Following
blocking, the plates were washed and serum, tear, nasal wash and stool samples
were added to duplicate wells at optimal dilutions predetermined for each type
of sample. The plates were incubated overnight at 4°C. After washing and
the application of goat anti-human IgG or goat anti-human IgA horseradish
peroxidase (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc.), plates were incubated for
1 hour at room temperature in the dark. Then plates were washed and the ABTS
substrate (Kirkegaard & Perry, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) was added. After the
plates were incubated 20 minutes at room temperature, absorbance was read at 405
nm.
Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL)
A sub-study was conducted to analyze T cells in the lungs of subjects
vaccinated with BCG ID and/or PO. Subjects were recruited for a single
bronchoscopy with BAL 1–12 months post-vaccination. A blood sample for
density gradient purification of PBMC was obtained on the day of the BAL
procedure in order to compare T cell responses in the lung and blood. The BAL
cells were centrifuged at 485xg and washed with medium. 2-300,000 PBMC/BAL cells
were placed in individual wells of IFN-γ ELISPOT plates and studied as
described above. Additional aliquots of PBMC and BAL cells were stained for
surface expression of CD3, CD4, CD8, CXCR3, and α4β1, analyzed
by flow cytometry and Flow Jo software.
Transcriptomal Analyses
To perform a preliminary study of the molecular signatures of
CD4+ T cells induced by ID vs PO BCG vaccination, we purified
CD4+ T cells with Miltenyi immunomagnetic beads and prepared dendritic
cells (DC) for use as antigen presenting cells as described previously.(26) We purified CD4+ T cells from
PBMC harvested before vaccination (naïve control samples), 7 days after
vaccination (representing the peak of T cell activation after BCG in
vivo) and 56 days after vaccination (representing an early memory
time point of BCG immunity). Autologous DC were infected or not with Danish BCG
(MOI of 20) and then co-cultured overnight with CD4+ T cells purified
from pre- and post-vaccination PBMC. RNA was extracted the next day with RNAeasy Mini Kit
(Qiagen, Valencia, CA, and USA). Therefore, 6 RNA samples were studied for each
volunteer individually. Illumina Bead Arrays were used to generate CD4
transcriptomes within the high throughput Microarray Core at Washington
University. Data were normalized and studied with GenePattern and GSEA to
compare pre- and post-vaccination transcriptomes directly ex
vivo and after BCG in vitro re-stimulation.(27, 28) The differential analysis was done by ComparativeMarkerSelection
v10 and t-sided T tests with 10000 permutations were used to identify gene
expressions.
Purified protein derivative (PPD) specific delayed-type hypersensitivity
(DTH) responses
To measure PPD-specific DTH responses 2 years after BCG vaccination, 5
TU of Tubersol was applied intradermally and mm of induration measured
48–72 hours later.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed by the EMMES Corporation. The
Wilcoxon matched pairs non-parametric test was used to compare pre- to
post-vaccination responses. Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare
proportions of positive responses and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to
compare responses between groups. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS
version 9.3 software(2011 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Helder I Nakaya; Jens Wrammert; Eva K Lee; Luigi Racioppi; Stephanie Marie-Kunze; W Nicholas Haining; Anthony R Means; Sudhir P Kasturi; Nooruddin Khan; Gui-Mei Li; Megan McCausland; Vibhu Kanchan; Kenneth E Kokko; Shuzhao Li; Rivka Elbein; Aneesh K Mehta; Alan Aderem; Kanta Subbarao; Rafi Ahmed; Bali Pulendran Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2011-07-10 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Niannian Ji; Neelam Mukherjee; Edwin E Morales; Maggie E Tomasini; Vincent Hurez; Tyler J Curiel; Getahun Abate; Dan F Hoft; Xiang-Ru Zhao; Jon Gelfond; Sourindra Maiti; Laurence J N Cooper; Robert S Svatek Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2019-05-25 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Jessica Jarvela; Michelle Moyer; Patrick Leahy; Tracey Bonfield; David Fletcher; Wambura N Mkono; Htin Aung; David H Canaday; Jean-Eudes Dazard; Richard F Silver Journal: J Immunol Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Karin Dijkman; Nacho Aguilo; Charelle Boot; Sam O Hofman; Claudia C Sombroek; Richard A W Vervenne; Clemens H M Kocken; Dessislava Marinova; Jelle Thole; Esteban Rodríguez; Michel P M Vierboom; Krista G Haanstra; Eugenia Puentes; Carlos Martin; Frank A W Verreck Journal: Cell Rep Med Date: 2021-01-19
Authors: Amanda J Martinot; Eryn Blass; Jingyou Yu; Malika Aid; Shant H Mahrokhian; Sara B Cohen; Courtney R Plumlee; Rafael A Larocca; Noman Siddiqi; Shoko Wakabayashi; Michelle Gardner; Rebecca Audette; Anne Devorak; Kevin B Urdahl; Eric J Rubin; Dan H Barouch Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 6.823