Literature DB >> 28852957

A 12-Month Review of Revisional Single Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Complicated Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding for Body Mass Index over 35.

Simon Ghosh1, The Lan Bui1, Christine E Skinner2, Stephanie Tan1, George Hopkins3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In many countries, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) was previously the most commonly performed bariatric procedure due to its operative safety and early efficacy. This procedure is now superseded because of doubtful long-term results and late complications. Many people eventually required revisional bariatric surgery such as conversion to single anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB). This study aims to assess the safety and durability of single-stage conversion from LAGB to SAGB in patients who are intolerant to LAGB and who also fail to lose weight, or re-gain weight.
METHODS: Seventy-four patients with BMI > 35 kg m-2 were selected from a prospective bariatric database between July 2012 and December 2015 for revisional laparoscopic SAGB surgery and were followed up at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after their operation.
RESULTS: The mean BMI at 6 weeks, then 3, 6 and 12 months were 41.6 ± 7.66, 38.8 ± 7.54, 35.4 ± 7.10 and 33.2 ± 7.34 kg m-2, respectively. The mean percentage EWL at 6 weeks then 3, 6 and 12 months were 21.0 ± 9.12, 37.8 ± 12.5, 55.1 ± 15.8 and 67.0 ± 19.6%, respectively. Postoperative follow-up at these times were 97, 85, 69 and 46%, respectively. Early (< 30 day) morbidity was 20.3% with major complications of CD grade 3a or more of 13.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that single-stage revisional SAGB after a failed LAGB achieved good short-term weight loss and low 30-day morbidity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Failed gastric banding; Gastric bypass; Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB); Revisional bariatric surgery; Single anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB); Weight loss 12 months

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28852957     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-2887-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  25 in total

1.  The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases.

Authors:  R Rutledge
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB): appraisal of clinical evidence.

Authors:  Wei-Jei Lee; Yu-Hung Lin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Prevalence of obesity in Australia.

Authors:  A W Thorburn
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.213

4.  A decade of bariatric surgery. What have we learned? Outcome in 520 patients from a single institution.

Authors:  M Musella; M Milone; D Gaudioso; P Bianco; R Palumbo; G Galloro; M Bellini; F Milone
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 6.071

5.  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  Wei-Jei Lee; Kong-Han Ser; Yi-Chih Lee; Jun-Juin Tsou; Shu-Chun Chen; Jung-Chien Chen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Laparoscopic revision from LAP-BAND to gastric bypass.

Authors:  Hadar Spivak; Oscar R Beltran; Plamen Slavchev; Erik B Wilson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Matthieu Bruzzi; Cédric Rau; Thibault Voron; Martino Guenzi; Anne Berger; Jean-Marc Chevallier
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.734

8.  Complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: experience with 1,000 patients over 7 years.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Chevallier; Franck Zinzindohoué; Richard Douard; Jean-Philippe Blanche; Jean-Louis Berta; Jean-Jacques Altman; Paul-Henri Cugnenc
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011.

Authors:  Henry Buchwald; Danette M Oien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Effect of location and speed of diagnosis on anastomotic leak outcomes in 3828 gastric bypass cases.

Authors:  Sukhyung Lee; Brennan Carmody; Luke Wolfe; Eric Demaria; John M Kellum; Harvey Sugerman; James W Maher
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB).

Authors:  Maurizio De Luca; Giacomo Piatto; Giovanni Merola; Jacques Himpens; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Miguel-A Carbajo; Kamal Mahawar; Alberto Sartori; Nicola Clemente; Miguel Herrera; Kelvin Higa; Wendy A Brown; Scott Shikora
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Secondary Bariatric Procedures in a High-Volume Centre: Prevalence, Indications and Outcomes.

Authors:  Mohamed Elshaer; Karim Hamaoui; Parushak Rezai; Kasim Ahmed; Nadira Mothojakan; Omer Al-Taan
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Revisional One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Restrictive Index Surgery-a Metaanalysis and Comparison with Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Charleen Yeo; Glen Ho; Nicholas Syn; Malcolm Mak; Saleem Ahmed; Aung Myint Oo; Aaryan Koura; Sanghvi Kaushal; Danson Yeo
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Mini Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO Position Statement.

Authors:  Maurizio De Luca; Tiffany Tie; Geraldine Ooi; Kelvin Higa; Jacques Himpens; Miguel-A Carbajo; Kamal Mahawar; Scott Shikora; Wendy A Brown
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.129

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.