Ding Xu1, Peng Luo2, Jukun Chen3, Liefeng Ji3, Luxu Yin4, WeiKang Wang4, Jiang Zhu3. 1. Shangyu People's Hospital of Shaoxing City, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China. xuding831129@126.com. 2. The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China. 3. Shangyu People's Hospital of Shaoxing City, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Aachen University Medical Center, Aachen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Hook plate fixation is widely used to treat acromioclavicular joint dislocation. However, there are many post-operative complications affecting the effect of treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the clavicular hook plate with different hook angles as a method of treatment in AC joint dislocation, and to guide the clinical application of hook plate. METHODS: We prospectively analysed 54 patients who were diagnosed with AC joint dislocation and treated withhook plate fixation by different hook angles. The patients were randomised into three groups: the -20° < AHP < 0° group, the 20° > AHP > 0° group and the 40° > AHP > 20° group. All patients were required to conform to regular follow-up post-operatively. Routine imaging to the shoulder was obtained to evaluate maintenance of the dislocation and the implant. Constant-Murley criteria were used to evaluate functional results. RESULTS: There were 19 patients in the -20° < AHP < 0° group, with one lost to follow-up, 22 patients in the 20° > AHP > 0° group, with two male patients lost to follow-up, and one female patient excluded because of no follow-up consent, and 19 patients in the 40° > AHP > 20° group, with one female and one male patient lost to follow-up. The Constant score was 61.8 ± 12.8, 74.7 ± 9.2 and 70.7 ± 9.4 before implant removal, and 78.8 ± 8.3, 87.1 ± 6.4 and 85.0 ± 6.1 after implant removal in the -20° < AHP < 0°, 20° > AHP > 0° and 40° > AHP > 20° groups, respectively. The functional results of the 20° > AHP > 0° and 40° > AHP > 20° groups were significantly better than the -20° < AHP < 0° group (P < 0.05), but the functional results of the 20° > AHP > 0° and 40° > AHP > 20° groups were not statistically significant. The CCD was 98.1 ± 4.8%, 107.5 ± 5.1% and 105.5 ± 4.1% before implant removal, and 98.8 ± 4.6%, 108.3 ± 4.8% and 107.2 ± 3.3% after implant removal in the three groups, respectively. The CCD of the 20° > AHP > 0° and 40° > AHP > 20° groups were statistically significantly different from the -20° < AHP < 0° group (P < 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference between the 20° > AHP > 0° group and the 40° > AHP > 20° group. Post-operative persistent pain occurred in 18.5% of all patients, post-operative stiffness occurred in 25.9% of all patients and 24.0% of patients had subacromial erosion. CONCLUSIONS: Hook plate treatment for AC joint dislocation can achieve the desired results, but the efficacy was significantly different depending on the different angles of the hook plate. AHP should be controlled within the range of 0-40° as much as possible when making clinical decisions.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Hook plate fixation is widely used to treat acromioclavicular joint dislocation. However, there are many post-operative complications affecting the effect of treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the clavicular hook plate with different hook angles as a method of treatment in AC joint dislocation, and to guide the clinical application of hook plate. METHODS: We prospectively analysed 54 patients who were diagnosed with AC joint dislocation and treated with hook plate fixation by different hook angles. The patients were randomised into three groups: the -20° < AHP < 0° group, the 20° > AHP > 0° group and the 40° > AHP > 20° group. All patients were required to conform to regular follow-up post-operatively. Routine imaging to the shoulder was obtained to evaluate maintenance of the dislocation and the implant. Constant-Murley criteria were used to evaluate functional results. RESULTS: There were 19 patients in the -20° < AHP < 0° group, with one lost to follow-up, 22 patients in the 20° > AHP > 0° group, with two male patients lost to follow-up, and one female patient excluded because of no follow-up consent, and 19 patients in the 40° > AHP > 20° group, with one female and one male patient lost to follow-up. The Constant score was 61.8 ± 12.8, 74.7 ± 9.2 and 70.7 ± 9.4 before implant removal, and 78.8 ± 8.3, 87.1 ± 6.4 and 85.0 ± 6.1 after implant removal in the -20° < AHP < 0°, 20° > AHP > 0° and 40° > AHP > 20° groups, respectively. The functional results of the 20° > AHP > 0° and 40° > AHP > 20° groups were significantly better than the -20° < AHP < 0° group (P < 0.05), but the functional results of the 20° > AHP > 0° and 40° > AHP > 20° groups were not statistically significant. The CCD was 98.1 ± 4.8%, 107.5 ± 5.1% and 105.5 ± 4.1% before implant removal, and 98.8 ± 4.6%, 108.3 ± 4.8% and 107.2 ± 3.3% after implant removal in the three groups, respectively. The CCD of the 20° > AHP > 0° and 40° > AHP > 20° groups were statistically significantly different from the -20° < AHP < 0° group (P < 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference between the 20° > AHP > 0° group and the 40° > AHP > 20° group. Post-operative persistent pain occurred in 18.5% of all patients, post-operative stiffness occurred in 25.9% of all patients and 24.0% of patients had subacromial erosion. CONCLUSIONS: Hook plate treatment for AC joint dislocation can achieve the desired results, but the efficacy was significantly different depending on the different angles of the hook plate. AHP should be controlled within the range of 0-40° as much as possible when making clinical decisions.
Entities:
Keywords:
AC joint dislocation; AHP; Hook plate; Outcomes
Authors: Yaiza Lopiz; Pablo Checa; Carlos García-Fernández; Jose Valle; Maria Luisa Vega; Fernando Marco Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 3.075