| Literature DB >> 28852591 |
Jesús Álvarez García1, Soledad García Gómez-Heras2, Luis Riera Del Moral3, Carlota Largo3, Damián García-Olmo4,5, Mariano García-Arranz4,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes is one of the major risk factors for peripheral arterial disease. In patients in whom surgery cannot be performed, cell therapy may be an alternative treatment. Since time is crucial for these patients, we propose the use of allogenic mesenchymal cells.Entities:
Keywords: Allogeneic stem cells; Limb ischemia
Year: 2017 PMID: 28852591 PMCID: PMC5572534 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Images of the surgical procedure.
Physical parameters to be evaluated during animal monitoring.
| Weight | No changes | 0 | |
| Loss 5–10% | 1 | ||
| Loss 10–15% | 2 | ||
| Loss 15–20% | 3 | ||
| Loss > 0% | 17 | ||
| General aspect | Coat | Normal | 0 |
| Altered | 1 | ||
| Bristly | 2 | ||
| Dehydratation | No | 0 | |
| Mild | 1 | ||
| Moderate | 2 | ||
| Severe | 17 | ||
| Activity | Normal | 0 | |
| Minor | 1 | ||
| Limited | 2 | ||
| Null | 17 | ||
| Extremity | Color | Normal | 0 |
| Cyanotic | 0 | ||
| Limp | No | 0 | |
| MILD | 1 | ||
| Severe | 2 | ||
| Contract | No | 0 | |
| Yes | 2 | ||
| Ulcers | No | 0 | |
| Yes | 2 | ||
| Mutilation | No | 0 | |
| Yes | 6 |
Figure 2Flow chart.
ASC, adipose derived stem cells.
Figure 3Clinical evolution.
(A) Physical parameters; (B) ischemic parameters.
Figure 4Macroscopic appearance of the treated limb.
(A) 10 Days after surgery without cellular treatment; (B) 10 Days after surgery and treatment with cells.
Evaluation of the histological parameters.
| Scar area | Attached nodes | Peri-cicatricial region | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inflammatory cells | Vascularization | |||||||||
| No. neutrophils /40× field | No. CD19 + /40× field | No. plasmatic cells /40× field | No. mastocytes /20× field | No. capillaries /40× field | No. arterioles /40× field | No. CD19+ /40× field | No. CD206+ /CD68+ | No. CD206+ /10× field | No. capillaries /50 muscle cells | |
| G.1 | 3.18 ± 0.21 | 15.51 ± 0.94 | 17.15 ± 1.70 | 3.1 ± 0.15 | 12.29 ± 0.95 | 1.39 ± 0.11 | 21.3 ± 1.50 | 85 /2,045 | 7.16 ± 0.31 | 24 |
| G.2 | 3.55 ± 0.29 | 14.95 ± 0.45 | 13.12 ± 0.49 | 5.8 ± 0.19 | 7.71 ± 1.29 | 1.19 ± 0.12 | 16.8 ± 1.20 | 499 /2,047 | 10.37 ± 0.43 | 36 |
Notes.
Control group
Treated group
mean ± se = standard error of mean
Figure 5Histopathological results.
(A) Treatment group. Low number of inflammatory cells (arrow), capillaries and and neoformed arterioles (asterisk). Hematoxiline-eosine staining, 20×. (B) Control Group l, greater number of inflammatory infiltrate; inflammatory cells (arrow), capillaries and neoformed arterioles (asterisk). Hematoxiline-eosine staining, 20×. (C–D) Expression of macrophagues M1/CD68+ in the larger photographs and M2/CD206+ expression in the small-right photographs. Cicatricial area of treated group (C) and control group (D), 20×. (E–F) Regional lymph nodes of treated group (E) and control group (F), 20×.