| Literature DB >> 28852423 |
Chen Zhao1, Hao Fang1,2, Shaolin Chen1.
Abstract
<span class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND:n> <span class="Chemical">Single cell oil (<span class="Chemical">SCO) production from lignocelluloses by oleaginous microorganisms is still high in production cost, making the subsequent production of biofuels inviable economically in such an era of low oil prices. Therefore, how to upgrade the final products of lignocellulose-based bioprocess to more valuable ones is becoming a more and more important issue.Entities:
Keywords: On-site cellulase production; Self-metathesis; Single cell oil; Steam-exploded corn stover; Three-stage enzymatic hydrolysis; Trichosporon cutaneum; α,ω-dicarboxylic acids
Year: 2017 PMID: 28852423 PMCID: PMC5568358 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0889-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1a FPAs and BGAs in the fermented broth obtained after 5 days fermentation from the monoculture of T. reesei or A. niger and the mixed cultures of T. reesei and A. niger grown in the medium containing steam-exploded corn stover (SECS). b Time course of cellulase production by the mixed culture (48 h/5:1) of T. reesei and A. niger induced by SECS. Data shown are means of at least three parallel samples (n ≥ 3) and error bars are standard deviations (mean ± SD)
Fig. 2a One-stage enzymatic hydrolysis of SECS. The dosage of cellulase and the concentration of SECS (dry material) were 25 FPIU/g glucan and 100 g/L, respectively. b One-stage enzymatic hydrolysis of SECS. The dosage of cellulase and the concentration of SECS (dry material) were 30 FPIU/g glucan and 300 g/L, respectively. c Three-stage (9 + 9 + 12 h) enzymatic hydrolysis of SECS. The total dosage of cellulase and the concentration of SECS (dry material) were 20 FPIU/g glucan and 300 g/L, respectively. The initial cellulase loading was 15, and 3 and 2 FPIU/g of glucan fresh cellulase were added for the second and the third stage, respectively. All enzymatic hydrolysis experiments were conducted in 250-mL Erlenmeyer flasks with a volume of 50 mL. Data shown are means of at least three parallel samples (n ≥ 3) and error bars are standard deviations (mean ± SD)
Fig. 3a Effect of C/N molar ratio on SCO production by T. cutaneum. “∞” means no nitrogen source, i.e., ammonium sulfate, was added. b Influence of working volume (mL) on SCO production by T. cutaneum. c Effect of pH on SCO production by T. cutaneum in the enzymatic hydrolysate of SECS. d Effect of temperature on SCO production by T. cutaneum. The enzymatic hydrolysate, used for SCO production, contained 50.84 ± 2.37 g/L glucose and 6.65 ± 0.32 g/L xylose. All the results were obtained after 8 days fermentation. Data shown are means of at least three parallel samples (n ≥ 3) and error bars are standard deviations (mean ± SD)
Fig. 4Time courses of SCO production by T. cutaneum in the enzymatic hydrolysates containing 50.84 ± 2.37 g/L glucose and 6.65 ± 0.32 g/L xylose (a), 108.65 ± 4.18 g/L glucose and 17.42 ± 0.85 g/L xylose (b), and 43.31 ± 1.57 g/L glucose and 7.06 ± 0.39 g/L xylose (c), respectively. Data shown are means of at least three parallel samples (n ≥ 3) and error bars are standard deviations (mean ± SD)
Results of single cell oil (SCO) production by T. cutaneum from steam-exploded corn stover (SECS)
| Bioprocess |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| SECS (g dry material) | 100 + 11.51 | 300 + 41.45 | 300 + 27.63 |
| Glucose (g/L) | 50.84 ± 2.37 | 108.65 ± 4.18 | 43.31 ± 1.57 |
| Xylose (g/L) | 6.65 ± 0.32 | 17.42 ± 0.85 | 7.06 ± 0.39 |
| Volume of enzymatic hydrolyzate (L) | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Fermentation time (d) | 8 | 16 | 7 |
| Biomass (g/L dry cell biomass) | 20.52 ± 1.09 | 45.58 ± 2.95 | 19.05 ± 0.98 |
| Biomass yield (g/g glucose + xylose) | 0.357 | 0.362 | 0.378 |
| Biomass productivity (g/L/d) | 2.565 | 2.849 | 2.721 |
| Total yield of biomass (g/g SECS) | 0.184 | 0.133 | 0.174 |
| Lipid (g/L) | 11.35 ± 0.77 | 23.49 ± 2.33 | 10.60 ± 0.65 |
| Lipid yield (g/g glucose + xylose) | 0.197 | 0.186 | 0.210 |
| Lipid productivity (g/L/d) | 1.419 | 1.468 | 1.514 |
| Lipid content (%) | 55.31 | 51.54 | 55.64 |
| Total yield of lipid (g/g SECS) | 0.102 | 0.069 | 0.097 |
| Total time from SECS to SCO (h) | 240 | 456 | 198 |
| Total productivity of biomass (g/h) | 0.086 | 0.100 | 0.289 |
| Total productivity of lipid (g/h) | 0.047 | 0.052 | 0.161 |
| Enzyme input (FPIU/g lipid) | 115.64 | 201.15 | 99.06 |
| Handling capacity (g SECS/h) | 0.465 | 0.749 | 1.655 |
| Utilization ratio of SECS (%) | 86.67 ± 4.06% | 63.35 ± 2.53% | 75.92 ± 2.96% |
Fig. 5Comparison of the different bioprocesses from SECS to SCO in the context of on-site cellulase production, a A from 100 g dry SECS to SCO with one-stage enzymatic hydrolysis; b B from 300 g dry SECS to SCO with one-stage enzymatic hydrolysis; and c C from 300 g dry SECS to SCO with three-stage enzymatic hydrolysis
Fatty acid compositions (%) of single cell oil produced by Trichosporon cutaneum via the bioprocess A, B, and C
| Fatty acid | Structure |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palmitic | C16:0 | 27.68 ± 1.53 | 27.55 ± 1.38 | 25.98 ± 1.05 |
| Palmitoleic | C16:1Δ9 | 1.38 ± 0.09 | 1.27 ± 0.15 | 1.57 ± 0.12 |
| Stearic | C18:0 | 10.07 ± 0.41 | 10.66 ± 0.54 | 10.18 ± 0.49 |
| Oleic | C18:1Δ9 | 50.25 ± 2.14 | 49.22 ± 1.05 | 51.25 ± 1.82 |
| Linoleic | C18:2Δ9,12 | 8.32 ± 0.38 | 8.09 ± 0.87 | 8.82 ± 0.43 |
| γ-Linolenic | C18:3Δ6,9,12 | 0.63 ± 0.08 | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 0.69 ± 0.05 |
| Others | 1.67 | 2.64 | 1.51 |
The unit of the compositions of fatty acids is %
Data shown are means of at least three parallel samples (n ≥ 3) and error bars are standard deviations (mean ± SD)
Effect of different catalysts dosage on the self-metathesis reaction
| Catalyst | Dosage (mol %)a | Reaction time (h) | Conversionb (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grubbs 2nd | 0.01 | 24 | 28.77 ± 0.76 |
| Grubbs 2nd | 0.1 | 1.5 | 81.15 ± 2.71 |
| Grubbs 2nd | 1 | 0.5 | 90.08 ± 3.25 |
| Grubbs 1st | 0.1 | 6 | 14.01 ± 0.49 |
Data shown are means of at least three parallel samples (n ≥ 3) and error bars are standard deviations (mean ± SD)
a mol% is the unit defined as the molar quantity of catalyst per 100 g substrate
bConversion (%) = (initial amount of fatty acids − residual amount of fatty acids) (g) × 100/initial amount of fatty acids (g)
Fig. 6The detail of the self-metathesis reaction
Fig. 7Overview of the processes from corn stover to long-chain DCAs, biofuels, and other products