Joo Myung Lee1, Doyeon Hwang1, Jonghanne Park1, Jinlong Zhang1, Yaliang Tong1, Chee Hae Kim1, Ji-In Bang1, Minseok Suh1, Jin Chul Paeng1, Gi Jeong Cheon1, Bon-Kwon Koo2. 1. From Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center (D.H., J.P., J.Z., C.H.K., B.-K.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (J.-I.B., M.S., J.C.P., G.J.C.), Seoul National University Hospital, Korea; Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China (Y.T.); and Institute on Aging, Seoul National University, Korea (G.J.C., B.-K.K.). 2. From Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center (D.H., J.P., J.Z., C.H.K., B.-K.K.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (J.-I.B., M.S., J.C.P., G.J.C.), Seoul National University Hospital, Korea; Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China (Y.T.); and Institute on Aging, Seoul National University, Korea (G.J.C., B.-K.K.). bkkoo@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although invasive physiological assessment for coronary stenosis has become a standard practice to guide treatment strategy, coronary circulatory response and changes in invasive physiological indexes, according to different anatomic and hemodynamic lesion severity, have not been fully demonstrated in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients with left anterior descending artery stenosis who underwent both 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography and invasive physiological measurement were analyzed. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) measured with positron emission tomography and invasively measured coronary pressures were used to calculate microvascular resistance and stenosis resistance. RESULTS: With progressive worsening of angiographic stenosis severity, both resting and hyperemic transstenotic pressure gradient and stenosis resistance increased (P<0.001 for all) and hyperemic MBF (P<0.001) and resting microvascular resistance (P=0.012) decreased. Resting MBF (P=0.383) and hyperemic microvascular resistance (P=0.431) were not changed and maintained stable. Both fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio decreased as angiographic stenosis severity, stenosis resistance, and transstenotic pressure gradient increased and hyperemic MBF decreased (all P<0.001). When the presence of myocardial ischemia was defined by both low hyperemic MBF and low coronary flow reserve, the diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio did not differ, regardless of cutoff values of hyperemic MBF and coronary flow reserve. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated how the coronary circulation changes in response to increasing coronary stenosis severity using 13N-ammonium positron emission tomography-derived MBF and invasively measured pressure data. Currently used resting and hyperemic pressure-derived invasive physiological indexes have similar patterns of relationships to the different anatomic and hemodynamic lesion severities. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01366404.
BACKGROUND: Although invasive physiological assessment for coronary stenosis has become a standard practice to guide treatment strategy, coronary circulatory response and changes in invasive physiological indexes, according to different anatomic and hemodynamic lesion severity, have not been fully demonstrated in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients with left anterior descending artery stenosis who underwent both 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography and invasive physiological measurement were analyzed. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) measured with positron emission tomography and invasively measured coronary pressures were used to calculate microvascular resistance and stenosis resistance. RESULTS: With progressive worsening of angiographic stenosis severity, both resting and hyperemic transstenotic pressure gradient and stenosis resistance increased (P<0.001 for all) and hyperemic MBF (P<0.001) and resting microvascular resistance (P=0.012) decreased. Resting MBF (P=0.383) and hyperemic microvascular resistance (P=0.431) were not changed and maintained stable. Both fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio decreased as angiographic stenosis severity, stenosis resistance, and transstenotic pressure gradient increased and hyperemic MBF decreased (all P<0.001). When the presence of myocardial ischemia was defined by both low hyperemic MBF and low coronary flow reserve, the diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio did not differ, regardless of cutoff values of hyperemic MBF and coronary flow reserve. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated how the coronary circulation changes in response to increasing coronary stenosis severity using 13N-ammonium positron emission tomography-derived MBF and invasively measured pressure data. Currently used resting and hyperemic pressure-derived invasive physiological indexes have similar patterns of relationships to the different anatomic and hemodynamic lesion severities. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01366404.
Authors: Hak Seung Lee; Joo Myung Lee; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Joon-Hyung Doh; Neng Dai; Martin K C Ng; Andy S C Yong; Damras Tresukosol; Ajit S Mullasari; Rony Mathew; Praveen Chandra; Kuang-Te Wang; Yundai Chen; Jiyan Chen; Kai-Hang Yiu; Nils P Johnson; Bon-Kwon Koo Journal: Cardiol J Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 2.737
Authors: Tim P van de Hoef; Joo Myung Lee; Mauro Echavarria-Pinto; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hitoshi Matsuo; Manesh R Patel; Justin E Davies; Javier Escaned; Jan J Piek Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Joo Myung Lee; Ki Hong Choi; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hakim-Moulay Dehbi; Joon-Hyung Doh; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Christopher M Cook; Rasha Al-Lamee; Ricardo Petraco; Sayan Sen; Iqbal S Malik; Sukhjinder S Nijjer; Hernán Mejía-Rentería; Eduardo Alegria-Barrero; Ali Alghamdi; John Altman; Sérgio B Baptista; Ravinay Bhindi; Waldemar Bojara; Salvatore Brugaletta; Pedro Canas Silva; Carlo Di Mario; Andrejs Erglis; Robert T Gerber; Olaf Going; Tobias Härle; Farrel Hellig; Ciro Indolfi; Luc Janssens; Allen Jeremias; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Ahmed Khashaba; Yuetsu Kikuta; Florian Krackhardt; Mika Laine; Sam J Lehman; Hitoshi Matsuo; Martijin Meuwissen; Giampaolo Niccoli; Jan J Piek; Flavo Ribichini; Habib Samady; James Sapontis; Arnold H Seto; Murat Sezer; Andrew S P Sharp; Jasvindar Singh; Hiroaki Takashima; Suneel Talwar; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Kare Tang; Eric Van Belle; Niels van Royen; Hugo Vinhas; Christiaan J Vrints; Darren Walters; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Bruce Samuels; Chris Buller; Manesh R Patel; Patrick Serruys; Javier Escaned; Justin E Davies Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Michael Michail; Udit Thakur; Ojas Mehta; John M Ramzy; Andrea Comella; Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid; James D Cameron; Stephen J Nicholls; Stephen P Hoole; Adam J Brown Journal: Open Heart Date: 2020-10