Literature DB >> 28851472

The partnership between the Brazilian School Feeding Program and family farming: a way for reducing ultra-processed foods in school meals.

Carla Rosane Paz Arruda Teo1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the profile of food acquisition in the National School Feeding Program according to the extent and purpose of food processing in three municipalities of southern Brazil during the implementation period of Law 11.947/2009.
DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Data for 2008-2010 involved quantities, prices and types of suppliers for food items purchased. In total, 1529 purchases were analysed. The items were classified into the following groups: G1 (unprocessed/minimally processed), G2 (culinary ingredients), G3 (processed), G4 (ultra-processed). Quantities of purchased foods were converted into energy and average prices ($US/4184 kJ (1000 kcal)) were calculated. The proportion of each food group in total purchases was expressed as both a percentage of total energy and a percentage of total expenditure. Data analysis was carried out in Stata version 12.1.
SETTING: Three municipalities in southern Brazil.
RESULTS: Relative contribution to total energy purchased was high for G1 (49·8 %; G2, 23·8 %; G3, 4·5 %; G4, 21·8 %). Among acquisitions from family farming, G1 represented 51·3 % of the total energy purchased; G2, 9·9 %; G3, 19·7 %; G4, 19·0 %. Total cost was as follows: G1, 61·6 %; G2, 3·9 %; G3, 18·5 %; G4, 16·0 %. Prices for food products from family farms were consistently higher. Average price from family farms was 1·3; from conventional suppliers, 0·9.
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of Law 11.947/2009 produced a positive effect on the regional profile of food purchases for the School Feeding Program. However, there is still considerable potential to promote health by strengthening relationships between family farming and school feeding.

Keywords:  Food and nutrition security; Health promotion; Nutrition programmes and policies; School feeding

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28851472     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980017002117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  1 in total

Review 1.  Why do some countries do better or worse in life expectancy relative to income? An analysis of Brazil, Ethiopia, and the United States of America.

Authors:  Toby Freeman; Hailay Abrha Gesesew; Clare Bambra; Elsa Regina Justo Giugliani; Jennie Popay; David Sanders; James Macinko; Connie Musolino; Fran Baum
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2020-11-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.