| Literature DB >> 28851456 |
Elham Moein1, Homa Hajimehdipoor2, Tayebeh Toliyat3, Rasool Choopani4, Maryam Hamzeloo-Moghadam5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently, people are more interested to traditional medicine. The traditional formulations should be converted to modern drug delivery systems to be more acceptable for the patients. In the present investigation, a poly herbal medicine "Ayarij-e-Faiqra" (AF) based on Iranian traditional medicine (ITM) has been formulated and its quality control parameters have been developed.Entities:
Keywords: Aloe; Ayarij-e-Faiqra; Formulation; HPLC; Iranian traditional medicine; Quality Control
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28851456 PMCID: PMC5576252 DOI: 10.1186/s40199-017-0185-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Daru ISSN: 1560-8115 Impact factor: 3.117
The ingredients of “Ayarij-e-Faiqra”
| No. | Scientific name | Family | Common name | Traditional name | Temperament | Part used |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Liliaceae | Bitter aloe | Sabr | Hot and dry | Dried juice |
| 2 |
| Lauraceae | Cinnamon | Darsini | Hot and dry | Bark |
| 3 |
| Lauraceae | Cassia, Chinese cinnamon | Salikhah | Hot and dry | Bark |
| 4 |
| Valerianaceae | Indian valerian, spikenard | Sumbul-uttib | Hot and dry | Rhizome |
| 5 |
| Anacardiaceae | Saghez | Elkol-botm | Hot and dry | Oleo gum resin |
| 6 |
| Piperaceae | Cubebs | Kababah | Hot and dry | Fruit |
| 7 |
| Rosaceae | Damask rose | Ward | Cold and dry | Flower |
Physicochemical analysis of crude herbs in AF formulation
| Ingredients | Assay | Essential oil | Foreign matter | Total ash | Acid insoluble ash | Alcohol soluble extractive | Water soluble extractive | Loss on drying | Alcohol insoluble substances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 58.4 ± 0.3% Aloin, (NLT 6%)a | - | - | 1.1% (NMT 4%) | - | - | 79.0% (NLT 50%) | 8.7% (NMT 12%) | 1.8% (NMT 10%) |
|
| - | 2.5% (NLT 1%) | 0.6% (NMT 2%) | 2.5% (NMT 3%) | 0.2% (NMT 2%) | 15.6% (NLT 2%) | 20.4% (NLT 3%) | - | - |
|
| - | 2.3%b | 0.7% (NMT 2%) | 3.1% (NMT 7%) | 0.4% (NMT 1%) | 13.7% (NLT 4%) | 19.8% (NLT 7%) | - | - |
|
| - | 1.6% (NLT 0.1%) | 0.9% (NMT 5%) | 5.0% (NMT 9%) | 1.9% (NMT 5%) | 4.9% (NLT 2%) | 10.7% (NLT 5%) | - | - |
|
| - | 2.1% | 1.3% | 6.5% | 0.8% | 20.2% | 17.6% | - | - |
|
| - | 5.8% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | - | - | - | - |
|
| 4.0% total phenolics as pyrogallol | 0.1% | 0.1% (NMT 2%) | 3.5% (NMT 7.5%) | 0.9% (NMT 1%) | 31.0% (NLT 15%) | 46.0% (NLT 24%) | - | - |
aThe data in parenthesis are acceptable ranges in Pharmacopoeia (USP/Unanian Pharmacopoeia)
bThere is no acceptable range for some data
Ingredients of AF tablets in pre-formulation studies
| Ingredients | Formulations | Function | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | ||
| Herbal powder (mg) | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | Active ingredient |
| Microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH 102) (mg) | 170 | 165 | 105 | 65 | - | - | - | Diluent, disintegrant |
| Corn starch (mg) | - | - | 65 | 105 | 170 | 195 | 190 | Diluent, binder, disintegrant |
| Croscarmellose sodium (mg) | - | - | - | 10 | - | - | - | Disintegrant |
| Crospovidone (mg) | 20 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 15 | - | - | Disintegrant |
| Colloidal silicon dioxide (mg) | - | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | - | - | Glidant |
| Magnesium stearate (mg) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 10 | Lubricant |
| Total (mg) | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 | - |
|
| 34 | 29 | 28 | 25 | 25 | 24 | 21 | - |
|
| 18.18 | 18.64 | 15.52 | 16.36 | 15.09 | 14.29 | 12.7 | - |
|
| 1.22 | 1.23 | 1.18 | 1.19 | 1.17 | 1.16 | 1.14 | - |
Physical properties of F6 and F7 formulations
| Tests | AF formula | |
|---|---|---|
| F6 | F7 | |
| Appearance | brown with white spots, smooth and biconvex | brown with white spots, smooth and biconvex |
| Diameter (mm) | 13.00 ± 0.01 | 13.00 ± 0.01 |
| Thickness (mm) | 5.20 ± 0.10 | 5.20 ± 0.05 |
| Weight variation (mg) | 697.10 ± 18.10 | 698.30 ± 17.55 |
| Friability (%) | 0.35 | 0.29 |
| Hardness (N) | 66.0 ± 9.0 | 66.5 ± 7.5 |
| Disintegration time (min) | Max: 9:15 | Max: 7:00 |
Physicochemical characteristics of AF tablets
| Tests | Results | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Core | Coated tablets | Coated tablets after 30 days | |
| appearance | Round, biconvex, dark-brown tables with white spots | Round, biconvex, green tablets | Round, biconvex, green tablets |
| Thickness | 5.2 mm | 5.8 mm | 5.8 mm |
| Diameter | 13.0 mm | 13.3 mm | 13.3 mm |
| Wight variation | 680.7–715.8 mg | 720.1–749.9 mg | 720.1–748.4 mg |
| Friability | 0.3% | - | - |
| Hardness | 60–71 N | 65–94 N | 71–89 N |
| Disintegration time | 5:35–7:00 min | 10:00–14:00 min | 9:30–14:10 min |
| Dissolution% | 95.7–96.7% | 98.0–99.5% | 97.14–98.44% |
| Assay of aloin | 132 mg/tab | 123.1 mg/tab | 118.53 mg/tab |
| Content uniformity of aloin | 95.9–103.5% | 96.3–103.9% | - |
Fig. 1“Ayarij-e-Faiqra” film coated tablets
Fig. 2HPLC chromatogram of Aloin reference standard (a) and AF tablet (b)
Method verification results for determination of aloin in AF tablets
| Parameter | Amount |
|---|---|
| Linear range | 5–500 μg/ml |
| Determination coefficient (r2) | 0.9999 |
| Equation | y = 24.974× + 40.538 |
| LOD | 0.0053 μg/ml |
| LOQ | 0.0161 μg/ml |
| Precision (Mean ± SD) | 119.4 ± 1.9 mg/tab |
| RSD% | 1.62% |
| Recovery% | 108.0 ± 1.5% |