Clare Liddy1, Patricia A Poulin2, Zoë Hunter3, Catherine Smyth4, Erin Keely5. 1. C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: cliddy@bruyere.org. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital, Department of Psychology, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 3. C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Chronic pain is a debilitating condition that requires prompt access to care for effective treatment. Wait times for care often exceed benchmark recommendations, with potential consequences to patient health outcomes. The goal of this paper is to gain the perspectives of patients attending a chronic pain clinic regarding the acceptability of current wait times and the impact of their experiences of waiting for chronic pain care. METHODS: The study took place in a chronic pain clinic at an academic-affiliated teaching hospital in Ottawa, Canada, which housed seven clinicians at the time of the study. New patients attending the chronic pain clinic between July 14, 2014 and August 5, 2015 were eligible to participate based on the availability of the research and clerical staff who administered the survey on a variety of days over the course of the study. Patients completed a self-administered 29-item survey. The survey took approximately five to ten minutes to complete. Questions pertained to patients' socioeconomic factors, chronicity and burden of pain symptoms, and satisfaction with current wait times. Actual wait times were self-reported. Survey results were entered into an Excel spreadsheet, exported to SPSS, and coded numerically to facilitate descriptive analyses using comparative graphs and tables. Open-text responses were reviewed by the authors. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients completed the survey. While 83% of patients stated that their ideal wait time was less than three months, 32% reported receiving an appointment within this period, and 31% reported waiting a year or more. Only 37% of patients felt the wait time for their appointment was appropriate. During their wait, 41% of patients reported receiving written information about chronic pain and 47% were referred to a local chronic pain management group. 94% reported interference with social/recreational activities and normal activities of daily living, 31% had to miss work or school due to the frequency of ongoing symptoms, and 22% reported being unable to attend work or school altogether. Furthermore, 37% of patients reported visiting the emergency room within the previous year and 65% worried about having a serious undiagnosed disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that wait times for chronic pain care, even those triaged as urgent cases, far exceeded what patients considered ideal. Only a third of patients received care within three months of making their appointment, while nearly another third waited over a year. During the waiting period, nearly all patients experienced some impact on their day-to-day activities and work or school attendance, half were unemployed, and nearly a quarter reported a complete inability to attend work or school because of pain. IMPLICATIONS: Wait times for chronic pain care exceed timelines deemed acceptable by patients, causing anxiety and reducing function. The patient perspective must be considered in initiatives attempting to improve access to care for this population with specific needs and goals. Innovative solutions, such as electronic consultation and shared care models, hold promise.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Chronic pain is a debilitating condition that requires prompt access to care for effective treatment. Wait times for care often exceed benchmark recommendations, with potential consequences to patient health outcomes. The goal of this paper is to gain the perspectives of patients attending a chronic pain clinic regarding the acceptability of current wait times and the impact of their experiences of waiting for chronic pain care. METHODS: The study took place in a chronic pain clinic at an academic-affiliated teaching hospital in Ottawa, Canada, which housed seven clinicians at the time of the study. New patients attending the chronic pain clinic between July 14, 2014 and August 5, 2015 were eligible to participate based on the availability of the research and clerical staff who administered the survey on a variety of days over the course of the study. Patients completed a self-administered 29-item survey. The survey took approximately five to ten minutes to complete. Questions pertained to patients' socioeconomic factors, chronicity and burden of pain symptoms, and satisfaction with current wait times. Actual wait times were self-reported. Survey results were entered into an Excel spreadsheet, exported to SPSS, and coded numerically to facilitate descriptive analyses using comparative graphs and tables. Open-text responses were reviewed by the authors. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients completed the survey. While 83% of patients stated that their ideal wait time was less than three months, 32% reported receiving an appointment within this period, and 31% reported waiting a year or more. Only 37% of patients felt the wait time for their appointment was appropriate. During their wait, 41% of patients reported receiving written information about chronic pain and 47% were referred to a local chronic pain management group. 94% reported interference with social/recreational activities and normal activities of daily living, 31% had to miss work or school due to the frequency of ongoing symptoms, and 22% reported being unable to attend work or school altogether. Furthermore, 37% of patients reported visiting the emergency room within the previous year and 65% worried about having a serious undiagnosed disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that wait times for chronic pain care, even those triaged as urgent cases, far exceeded what patients considered ideal. Only a third of patients received care within three months of making their appointment, while nearly another third waited over a year. During the waiting period, nearly all patients experienced some impact on their day-to-day activities and work or school attendance, half were unemployed, and nearly a quarter reported a complete inability to attend work or school because of pain. IMPLICATIONS: Wait times for chronic pain care exceed timelines deemed acceptable by patients, causing anxiety and reducing function. The patient perspective must be considered in initiatives attempting to improve access to care for this population with specific needs and goals. Innovative solutions, such as electronic consultation and shared care models, hold promise.
Authors: Ishan Naidu; Jessica Ryvlin; Devin Videlefsky; Jiyue Qin; Wenzhu B Mowrey; Jong H Choi; Chloe Citron; James Gary; Joshua A Benton; Brandon T Weiss; Michael Longo; Nabil N Matmati; Rafael De la Garza Ramos; Jonathan Krystal; Murray Echt; Yaroslav Gelfand; Phillip Cezayirli; Neeky Yassari; Benjamin Wang; Erida Castro-Rivas; Mark Headlam; Adaobi Udemba; Lavinia Williams; Andrew I Gitkind; Reza Yassari; Vijay Yanamadala Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Mohamed A Osman; Kara Schick-Makaroff; Stephanie Thompson; Robin Featherstone; Liza Bialy; Julia Kurzawa; Ikechi G Okpechi; Syed Habib; Soroush Shojai; Kailash Jindal; Scott Klarenbach; Aminu K Bello Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Mohamed A Osman; Kara Schick-Makaroff; Stephanie Thompson; Liza Bialy; Robin Featherstone; Julia Kurzawa; Deenaz Zaidi; Ikechi Okpechi; Syed Habib; Soroush Shojai; Kailash Jindal; Branko Braam; Erin Keely; Clare Liddy; Braden Manns; Marcello Tonelli; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Scott Klarenbach; Aminu K Bello Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2019-09-13
Authors: Simon Deslauriers; Jean-Sébastien Roy; Sasha Bernatsky; Nathan Blanchard; Debbie E Feldman; Anne Marie Pinard; Mary-Ann Fitzcharles; François Desmeules; Kadija Perreault Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 2.655