BACKGROUND: Blood transfusion is a highly prevalent procedure in hospitalized patients and in some clinical scenarios it has lifesaving potential. However, in most cases transfusion is administered to hemodynamically stable patients with no benefit, but increased odds of adverse patient outcomes and substantial direct and indirect cost. Therefore, the concept of Patient Blood Management has increasingly gained importance to pre-empt and reduce transfusion and to identify the optimal transfusion volume for an individual patient when transfusion is indicated. OBJECTIVES: It was our aim to describe, how predictive modeling and machine learning tools applied on pre-operative data can be used to predict the amount of red blood cells to be transfused during surgery and to prospectively optimize blood ordering schedules. In addition, the data derived from the predictive models should be used to benchmark different hospitals concerning their blood transfusion patterns. METHODS: 6,530 case records obtained for elective surgeries from 16 centers taking part in two studies conducted in 2004-2005 and 2009-2010 were analyzed. Transfused red blood cell volume was predicted using random forests. Separate models were trained for overall data, for each center and for each of the two studies. Important characteristics of different models were compared with one another. RESULTS: Our results indicate that predictive modeling applied prior surgery can predict the transfused volume of red blood cells more accurately (correlation coefficient cc = 0.61) than state of the art algorithms (cc = 0.39). We found significantly different patterns of feature importance a) in different hospitals and b) between study 1 and study 2. CONCLUSION: We conclude that predictive modeling can be used to benchmark the importance of different features on the models derived with data from different hospitals. This might help to optimize crucial processes in a specific hospital, even in other scenarios beyond Patient Blood Management.
BACKGROUND: Blood transfusion is a highly prevalent procedure in hospitalized patients and in some clinical scenarios it has lifesaving potential. However, in most cases transfusion is administered to hemodynamically stable patients with no benefit, but increased odds of adverse patient outcomes and substantial direct and indirect cost. Therefore, the concept of Patient Blood Management has increasingly gained importance to pre-empt and reduce transfusion and to identify the optimal transfusion volume for an individual patient when transfusion is indicated. OBJECTIVES: It was our aim to describe, how predictive modeling and machine learning tools applied on pre-operative data can be used to predict the amount of red blood cells to be transfused during surgery and to prospectively optimize blood ordering schedules. In addition, the data derived from the predictive models should be used to benchmark different hospitals concerning their blood transfusion patterns. METHODS: 6,530 case records obtained for elective surgeries from 16 centers taking part in two studies conducted in 2004-2005 and 2009-2010 were analyzed. Transfused red blood cell volume was predicted using random forests. Separate models were trained for overall data, for each center and for each of the two studies. Important characteristics of different models were compared with one another. RESULTS: Our results indicate that predictive modeling applied prior surgery can predict the transfused volume of red blood cells more accurately (correlation coefficient cc = 0.61) than state of the art algorithms (cc = 0.39). We found significantly different patterns of feature importance a) in different hospitals and b) between study 1 and study 2. CONCLUSION: We conclude that predictive modeling can be used to benchmark the importance of different features on the models derived with data from different hospitals. This might help to optimize crucial processes in a specific hospital, even in other scenarios beyond Patient Blood Management.
Authors: Michael F Leahy; Axel Hofmann; Simon Towler; Kevin M Trentino; Sally A Burrows; Stuart G Swain; Jeffrey Hamdorf; Trudi Gallagher; Audrey Koay; Gary C Geelhoed; Shannon L Farmer Journal: Transfusion Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Lawrence T Goodnough; Paul Maggio; Eric Hadhazy; Lisa Shieh; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Paul Khari; Neil Shah Journal: Transfusion Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: J Meier; D Filipescu; S Kozek-Langenecker; J Llau Pitarch; S Mallett; P Martus; I Matot Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Sunny S Lou; Hanyang Liu; Chenyang Lu; Troy S Wildes; Bruce L Hall; Thomas Kannampallil Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 8.986
Authors: Andreas Mitterecker; Axel Hofmann; Kevin M Trentino; Adam Lloyd; Michael F Leahy; Karin Schwarzbauer; Thomas Tschoellitsch; Carl Böck; Sepp Hochreiter; Jens Meier Journal: Transfusion Date: 2020-06-28 Impact factor: 3.157