Sveva Auletta1, Daniela Baldoni2, Michela Varani1, Filippo Galli1, Iman A Hajar3, Adriano Duatti3, Guillermina Ferro-Flores4, Andrej Trampuz5, Alberto Signore6. 1. Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. 2. Infectious Diseases Research Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. 3. Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. 4. Department of Radioactive Material, National Institute of Nuclear Investigations, Center of Nuclear Applications on Health, Ocoyoacac, Mexico. 5. Unit of Septic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité, University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany. 6. Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy - alberto.signore@uniroma1.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of implant-associated infection is challenging. Several radiopharmaceuticals have been described but direct comparisons are limited. Here we compared in vitro and in an animal model 99mTc-UBI, 99mTc-ciprofloxacin, 99mTcN-CiproCS2 and 111In-DTPA-biotin for targeting E. coli (ATCC 25922) and S. aureus (ATCC 43335). METHODS: Stability controls were performed with the labelled radiopharmaceuticals during 6 hours in saline and serum. The in vitro binding to viable or killed bacteria was evaluated at 37 °C and 4 °C. For in vivo studies, Teflon cages were subcutaneously implanted in mice, followed by percutaneous infection. Biodistribution of i.v. injected radiolabelled radiopharmaceuticals were evaluated during 24 h in cages and dissected tissues. RESULTS: Labelling efficiency of all radiopharmaceuticals ranged between 94% and 98%, with high stability both in saline and in human serum. In vitro binding assays displayed a rapid but poor bacterial binding for all tested agents. Similar binding kinetic occurred also with heat-killed and ethanol-killed bacteria. In the tissue cage model, infection was detected at different time points: 99mTc-UBI and 99mTcN-CiproCS2 showed higher infected cage/sterile cage ratio at 24 hours for both E. coli and S. aureus; 99mTc-Ciprofloxacin at 24 hours for both E. coli and at 4 hours for S. aureus; 111In-DTPA-biotin accumulates faster in both E. coli and S. aureus infected cages. CONCLUSIONS: 99mTc-UBI, 99mTcN-CiproCS2 showed poor in vitro binding but good in vivo binding to E. coli only. 111In-DTPA-biotin showed poor in vitro binding but good in vivo binding to S. aureus and poor to E. coli. 99mTc-Ciprofloxacin showed poor in vitro binding but good in vivo binding to all tested bacteria. The mechanism of accumulation in infected sites remains to be elucidated.
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of implant-associated infection is challenging. Several radiopharmaceuticals have been described but direct comparisons are limited. Here we compared in vitro and in an animal model 99mTc-UBI, 99mTc-ciprofloxacin, 99mTcN-CiproCS2 and 111In-DTPA-biotin for targeting E. coli (ATCC 25922) and S. aureus (ATCC 43335). METHODS: Stability controls were performed with the labelled radiopharmaceuticals during 6 hours in saline and serum. The in vitro binding to viable or killed bacteria was evaluated at 37 °C and 4 °C. For in vivo studies, Teflon cages were subcutaneously implanted in mice, followed by percutaneous infection. Biodistribution of i.v. injected radiolabelled radiopharmaceuticals were evaluated during 24 h in cages and dissected tissues. RESULTS: Labelling efficiency of all radiopharmaceuticals ranged between 94% and 98%, with high stability both in saline and in human serum. In vitro binding assays displayed a rapid but poor bacterial binding for all tested agents. Similar binding kinetic occurred also with heat-killed and ethanol-killed bacteria. In the tissue cage model, infection was detected at different time points: 99mTc-UBI and 99mTcN-CiproCS2 showed higher infected cage/sterile cage ratio at 24 hours for both E. coli and S. aureus; 99mTc-Ciprofloxacin at 24 hours for both E. coli and at 4 hours for S. aureus; 111In-DTPA-biotin accumulates faster in both E. coli and S. aureus infected cages. CONCLUSIONS:99mTc-UBI, 99mTcN-CiproCS2 showed poor in vitro binding but good in vivo binding to E. coli only. 111In-DTPA-biotin showed poor in vitro binding but good in vivo binding to S. aureus and poor to E. coli. 99mTc-Ciprofloxacin showed poor in vitro binding but good in vivo binding to all tested bacteria. The mechanism of accumulation in infected sites remains to be elucidated.
Authors: Matthew F L Parker; Robert R Flavell; Justin M Luu; Oren S Rosenberg; Michael A Ohliger; David M Wilson Journal: ACS Infect Dis Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 5.084
Authors: Alberto Signore; Vera Artiko; Martina Conserva; Guillermina Ferro-Flores; Mick M Welling; Sanjay K Jain; Søren Hess; Mike Sathekge Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-07-25 Impact factor: 4.241