Literature DB >> 28848921

Responder Analyses for Treatment Effects in COPD Using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire.

Paul W Jones1,2, Heather Gelhorn3, Hilary Wilson3, Niklas Karlsson4, Shailendra Menjoge5, Hana Müllerova2, Stephen I Rennard6,7, Ruth Tal-Singer8, Debora Merrill9, Maggie Tabberer2.   

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcomes data in clinical trials are usually reported as mean values, interpreted in comparison to a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and ignoring the possibility of a sizable proportion of patients experiencing a worthwhile benefit when the majority did not. This analysis tested the reliability of calculated responder rates (from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] patients) with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) using a range of responder cut-points above and below the MCID (4 units).
Methods: Individual patient data (i.e., data from long-acting bronchodilator [LAB] and inhaled corticosteroids [ICS]/long-acting beta2-agonist [LABA] randomized clinical studies) in the COPD Biomarker Qualification Consortium database were used: short-term (≤1-year duration; 14,814 patients,) and medium-term (2-4 years; 12,043 patients). Responder rates versus placebo across SGRQ score change thresholds ranging from -1.5 to -8.0 were tested; differences were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) of a patient exceeding the threshold versus no change or deterioration.
Results: The ORs measuring benefit of active treatment were similar across thresholds in short-term studies (LAB, ORs 1.40-1.42; LABA/ICS, 1.50-1.56) and medium-term LAB studies (ORs 1.34-1.43), whereas ORs in medium-term studies with LABA/ICS intervention showed a trend for higher response rates at higher values of threshold cut-points (1.64-1.79). In short-term studies, different thresholds had little effect on the OR between active drugs versus a trend for lower ORs with lower thresholds in medium-term studies. Conclusions: The OR for a treatment effect compared with placebo appears consistent across a range of responder cut-points. In medium-term trials, the treatment difference between active drugs suggests that use of a lower threshold would not increase the odds of observing a measured treatment difference.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBQC; COPD Biomarkers Qualification Consortium; SGRQ; SGRQ threshold; St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; forced expiratory volume in 1 second; responder rates

Year:  2017        PMID: 28848921      PMCID: PMC5559111          DOI: 10.15326/jcopdf.4.2.2017.0130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis        ISSN: 2372-952X


  10 in total

1.  Bias due to withdrawal in long-term randomised trials in COPD: evidence from the TORCH study.

Authors:  Jørgen Vestbo; Julie Anne Anderson; Peter Mark Anthony Calverley; Bartolomé Celli; Gary Thomas Ferguson; Christine Jenkins; Julie Carol Yates; Paul Wyatt Jones
Journal:  Clin Respir J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.570

2.  St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire: MCID.

Authors:  Paul W Jones
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.409

3.  The COPD Biomarker Qualification Consortium (CBQC).

Authors:  Richard Casaburi; Bartolome Celli; James Crapo; Gerard Criner; Thomas Croxton; Alasdair Gaw; Paul Jones; Nancy Kline-Leidy; David A Lomas; Debora Merrill; Michael Polkey; Stephen Rennard; Frank Sciurba; Ruth Tal-Singer; Robert Stockley; Gerry Turino; Jorgen Vestbo; John Walsh
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.409

4.  The COPD Biomarkers Qualification Consortium Database: Baseline Characteristics of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire Dataset.

Authors:  Maggie Tabberer; Victoria S Benson; Heather Gelhorn; Hilary Wilson; Niklas Karlsson; Hana Müllerova; Shailendra Menjoge; Stephen I Rennard; Ruth Tal-Singer; Debora Merrill; Paul W Jones
Journal:  Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis       Date:  2017-03-13

5.  Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Peter M A Calverley; Julie A Anderson; Bartolome Celli; Gary T Ferguson; Christine Jenkins; Paul W Jones; Julie C Yates; Jørgen Vestbo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Outcomes and markers in the assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  P W Jones; A G N Agusti
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 16.671

7.  A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Donald P Tashkin; Bartolome Celli; Stephen Senn; Deborah Burkhart; Steven Kesten; Shailendra Menjoge; Marc Decramer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Minimal clinically important differences in pharmacological trials.

Authors:  Paul W Jones; Kai M Beeh; Kenneth R Chapman; Marc Decramer; Donald A Mahler; Jadwiga A Wedzicha
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 9.  A review of the most common patient-reported outcomes in COPD--revisiting current knowledge and estimating future challenges.

Authors:  Mario Cazzola; Nicola Alexander Hanania; William MacNee; Katja Rüdell; Claire Hackford; Nihad Tamimi
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2015-04-07

Review 10.  Beyond FEV₁ in COPD: a review of patient-reported outcomes and their measurement.

Authors:  Paul Jones; Marc Miravitlles; Thys van der Molen; Karoly Kulich
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2012-10-16
  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Deep neural network analyses of spirometry for structural phenotyping of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Sandeep Bodduluri; Arie Nakhmani; Joseph M Reinhardt; Carla G Wilson; Merry-Lynn McDonald; Ramaraju Rudraraju; Byron C Jaeger; Nirav R Bhakta; Peter J Castaldi; Frank C Sciurba; Chengcui Zhang; Purushotham V Bangalore; Surya P Bhatt
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-07-09

2.  What's New with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire and Why Do We Care?

Authors:  Megan Hardin; Stephen I Rennard
Journal:  Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis       Date:  2017-04-03

Review 3.  Treatment Trials in Young Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Pre-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: Time to Move Forward.

Authors:  Fernando J Martinez; Alvar Agusti; Bartolome R Celli; MeiLan K Han; James P Allinson; Surya P Bhatt; Peter Calverley; Sanjay H Chotirmall; Badrul Chowdhury; Patrick Darken; Carla A Da Silva; Gavin Donaldson; Paul Dorinsky; Mark Dransfield; Rosa Faner; David M Halpin; Paul Jones; Jerry A Krishnan; Nicholas Locantore; Fernando D Martinez; Hana Mullerova; David Price; Klaus F Rabe; Colin Reisner; Dave Singh; Jørgen Vestbo; Claus F Vogelmeier; Robert A Wise; Ruth Tal-Singer; Jadwiga A Wedzicha
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Cost-effectiveness of twice-daily indacaterol/glycopyrrolate inhalation powder for the treatment of moderate to severe COPD in the US.

Authors:  Krithika Rajagopalan; Lisa Bloudek; Jessica Marvel; Carole Dembek; Abhishek Kavati
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-11-28

5.  Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in COPD: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Edward M Kerwin; Isabelle H Boucot; Claus F Vogelmeier; Francois Maltais; Ian P Naya; Lee Tombs; Paul W Jones; David A Lipson; Tom Keeley; Leif Bjermer
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.