| Literature DB >> 28848022 |
Elizabeth A Lakota1, Justin C Bader2, Voon Ong3, Ken Bartizal3, Lynn Miesel4, David R Andes5, Sujata M Bhavnani2, Christopher M Rubino2, Paul G Ambrose2, Alexander J Lepak5.
Abstract
CD101 is a novel echinocandin with concentration-dependent fungicidal activity in vitro and a long half-life (∼133 h in humans, ∼70 to 80 h in mice). Given these characteristics, it is likely that the shape of the CD101 exposure (i.e., the time course of CD101 concentrations) influences efficacy. To test this hypothesis, doses which produce the same total area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were administered to groups of neutropenic ICR mice infected with Candida albicans R303 using three different schedules. A total CD101 dose of 2 mg/kg was administered as a single intravenous (i.v.) dose or in equal divided doses of either 1 mg/kg twice weekly or 0.29 mg/kg/day over 7 days. The studies were performed using a murine disseminated candidiasis model. Animals were euthanized at 168 h following the start of treatment. Fungi grew well in the no-treatment control group and showed variable changes in fungal density in the treatment groups. When the CD101 AUC from 0 to 168 h (AUC0-168) was administered as a single dose, a >2 log10 CFU reduction from the baseline at 168 h was observed. When twice-weekly and daily regimens with similar AUC values were administered, net fungal stasis and a >1 log10 CFU increase from the baseline were observed, respectively. These data support the hypothesis that the shape of the CD101 AUC influences efficacy. Thus, CD101 administered once per week demonstrated a greater degree of fungal killing than the same dose divided into twice-weekly or daily regimens.Entities:
Keywords: PK/PD; echinocandin; exposure shape; pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics; single dose
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28848022 PMCID: PMC5655053 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00758-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
FIG 1Observed (points) and model-predicted (lines) CD101 total-drug concentration (Conc.) versus time following i.p. administration of CD101.
Final CD101 pharmacokinetic model parameter estimates
| Parameter | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Final estimate | % SEM | |
| CLt (liters/h/kg) | 0.0104 | 3.55 |
| V1 (liters/kg) | 0.201 | 0.585 |
| Q2 (liters/h/kg) | 0.0153 | 1.24 |
| V2 (liters/kg) | 0.871 | 1.62 |
| Q3 (liters/h/kg) | 0.312 | 19.7 |
| V3 (liters/kg) | 0.0341 | 19.4 |
| Q4 (liters/h/kg) | 0.0723 | 43.8 |
| V4 (liters/kg) | 0.165 | 18.5 |
CLt, total clearance; V1, central compartment volume; Q2, Q3, Q4 = distributional clearances; V2, V3, V4 = peripheral compartment volumes.
FIG 2Mean change (solid circles) and range of change (error bars) in log10 CFU from the baseline at 168 h versus CD101 free-drug AUC0−168/MIC ratio by fractionation schedule.
FIG 3Mean change (bar) and range of change (error bars) in log10 CFU from the baseline at 168 h after administration of CD101 (2 mg/kg) by fractionation schedule.
FIG 4Simulated free-drug concentration-time profiles for the fractionated CD101 2-mg/kg regimens.
Summary of CD101 dosing regimens evaluated in front-loaded dose studies
| Total dose | Dosing schedule | Fractionated dose(s) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.7 mg/kg i.p. | Single | 0.7 mg/kg × 1 |
| Twice weekly | 0.35 mg/kg × 2 | |
| Daily | 0.1 mg/kg × 7 | |
| 2 mg/kg i.p. | Single | 2 mg/kg × 1 |
| Twice weekly | 1 mg/kg × 2 | |
| Daily | 0.29 mg/kg × 7 | |
| 7 mg/kg i.p. | Single | 7 mg/kg × 1 |
| Twice weekly | 3.5 mg/kg × 2 | |
| Daily | 1 mg/kg × 7 |
For the twice-weekly dosing schedule, the second dose was administered 84 h (3.5 days) after first dose.