Literature DB >> 28847808

Selective Modulation of Orbitofrontal Network Activity during Negative Occasion Setting.

Justin L Shobe1, Konstantin I Bakhurin2, Leslie D Claar3, Sotiris C Masmanidis1,2,4,5.   

Abstract

Discrete cues can gain powerful control over behavior to help an animal anticipate and cope with upcoming events. This is important in conditions where understanding the relationship between complex stimuli provides a means to resolving situational ambiguity. However, it is unclear how cortical circuits generate and maintain these signals that conditionally regulate behavior. To address this, we established a Pavlovian serial feature-negative conditioning paradigm, where male mice are trained on a trial in which a conditioned stimulus (CS) is presented alone and followed by reward, or a feature-negative trial in which the CS is preceded by a feature cue indicating there is no reward. Mice learn to respond with anticipatory licking to a solitary CS, but significantly suppress their responding to the same cue during feature-negative trials. We show that the feature cue forms a selective association with its paired CS, because the ability of the feature to transfer its suppressive properties to a separately rewarded cue is limited. Next, to examine the underlying neural dynamics, we conduct recordings in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). We find that the feature cue significantly and selectively inhibits CS-evoked activity. Finally, we find that the feature triggers a distinct OFC network state during the delay period between the feature and CS, establishing a potential link between the feature and future events. Together, our findings suggest that OFC dynamics are modulated by the feature cue and its associated conditioned stimulus in a manner consistent with an occasion setting model.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The ability of patterned cues to form an inhibitory relationship with ambiguously rewarded outcomes has been appreciated since early studies on learning and memory. However, it was often assumed that these cues, despite their hierarchical nature, still made direct associative links with neural rewarding events. This model was significantly challenged, largely by the work of Holland and colleagues, who demonstrated that under certain conditions cues can inherit occasion setting properties whereby they modulate the ability of a paired cue to elicit its conditioned response. Here we provide some of the first evidence that the activity of a cortical circuit is selectively modulated by such cues, thereby providing insight into the mechanisms of higher order learning.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/379415-09$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  negative occasion setting; orbitofrontal cortex; single-unit electrophysiology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28847808      PMCID: PMC5618261          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0572-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  39 in total

Review 1.  Cellular basis of working memory.

Authors:  P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Involvement of retrosplenial cortex in forming associations between multiple sensory stimuli.

Authors:  Siobhan Robinson; Christopher S Keene; Hannah F Iaccarino; Daisy Duan; David J Bucci
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Brain activity mapping at multiple scales with silicon microprobes containing 1,024 electrodes.

Authors:  Justin L Shobe; Leslie D Claar; Sepideh Parhami; Konstantin I Bakhurin; Sotiris C Masmanidis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Medial Orbitofrontal Neurons Preferentially Signal Cues Predicting Changes in Reward during Unblocking.

Authors:  Nina Lopatina; Michael A McDannald; Clay V Styer; Jacob F Peterson; Brian F Sadacca; Joseph F Cheer; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Medial prefrontal activity during delay period contributes to learning of a working memory task.

Authors:  Ding Liu; Xiaowei Gu; Jia Zhu; Xiaoxing Zhang; Zhe Han; Wenjun Yan; Qi Cheng; Jiang Hao; Hongmei Fan; Ruiqing Hou; Zhaoqin Chen; Yulei Chen; Chengyu T Li
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Effects of stimulus contact on the feature-positive effect.

Authors:  G M Pace; D F McCoy
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1981-03

7.  Neuron activity related to short-term memory.

Authors:  J M Fuster; G E Alexander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Imbalanced Activity in the Orbitofrontal Cortex and Nucleus Accumbens Impairs Behavioral Inhibition.

Authors:  Heidi C Meyer; David J Bucci
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Gamma and Beta Bursts Underlie Working Memory.

Authors:  Mikael Lundqvist; Jonas Rose; Pawel Herman; Scott L Brincat; Timothy J Buschman; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Gamma oscillations correlate with working memory load in humans.

Authors:  Marc W Howard; Daniel S Rizzuto; Jeremy B Caplan; Joseph R Madsen; John Lisman; Richard Aschenbrenner-Scheibe; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  9 in total

1.  Open source silicon microprobes for high throughput neural recording.

Authors:  Long Yang; Kwang Lee; Jomar Villagracia; Sotiris C Masmanidis
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 2.  Occasion setting.

Authors:  Kurt M Fraser; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex, but not dorsal hippocampus, are necessary for the control of reward-seeking by occasion setters.

Authors:  Kurt M Fraser; Patricia H Janak
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 4.415

4.  Is the core function of orbitofrontal cortex to signal values or make predictions?

Authors:  Jingfeng Zhou; Matthew P H Gardner; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2021-02-25

5.  Occasion setters attain incentive motivational value: implications for contextual influences on reward-seeking.

Authors:  Kurt M Fraser; Patricia H Janak
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Representation of foreseeable choice outcomes in orbitofrontal cortex triplet-wise interactions.

Authors:  Emili Balaguer-Ballester; Ramon Nogueira; Juan M Abolafia; Ruben Moreno-Bote; Maria V Sanchez-Vives
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Roles of the prefrontal cortex in learning to time the onset of pre-existing motor programs.

Authors:  Beom-Chan Lee; Jongkwan Choi; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A Role for Serotonin in Modulating Opposing Drive and Brake Circuits of Impulsivity.

Authors:  Stephanie S Desrochers; Mitchell G Spring; Katherine M Nautiyal
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Ambiguity drives higher-order Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  Tomislav D Zbozinek; Omar D Perez; Toby Wise; Michael Fanselow; Dean Mobbs
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.779

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.