Rafael Bonuti1, Sílvio Morato2. 1. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. 2. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: smorato@ffclrp.usp.br.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In studies that measure social behavior of a freely interacting pair rats social behavior of one rat is strongly influenced by the behavior of the other. This prevents evaluating social behavior of one single rat. NEW METHOD: We assessed the motivation to interact socially in a modified open-field, by measuring the time a rat attempted to interact with a co-specific separated by a grid in a birdcage outside of the apparatus. We propose time in front of the birdcage is an indicator of social behavior. RESULTS: We showed that the focal rat allocates more time in front of the birdcage, interacting with another rat through the grid. Also, that the presence of the other rat that attracts the focal rat. Habituation to the apparatus, repeated testing and illumination condition did not alter the proximity measures of rats. Finally, treatment with chlordiazepoxide (3.0mg/kg) either increased the time spent in front of the cage by males and females or (5.6mg/kg) increased the proximity measure of females. COMPARING WITH EXISTING METHOD: Our method prevents partners from influencing the target rat's social behavior; existing methods do not. Also, it is more sensitive to the effect of chlordiazepoxide than the broadly used method proposed by File and Hyde (1978). CONCLUSIONS: Proximity is an advantageous measure: it allows the assessment of only one focal animal without the interference of a partner; it is simple to take; it requires little interpretation skills or training from the experimenter, no special equipment or conditions.
BACKGROUND: In studies that measure social behavior of a freely interacting pair rats social behavior of one rat is strongly influenced by the behavior of the other. This prevents evaluating social behavior of one single rat. NEW METHOD: We assessed the motivation to interact socially in a modified open-field, by measuring the time a rat attempted to interact with a co-specific separated by a grid in a birdcage outside of the apparatus. We propose time in front of the birdcage is an indicator of social behavior. RESULTS: We showed that the focal rat allocates more time in front of the birdcage, interacting with another rat through the grid. Also, that the presence of the other rat that attracts the focal rat. Habituation to the apparatus, repeated testing and illumination condition did not alter the proximity measures of rats. Finally, treatment with chlordiazepoxide (3.0mg/kg) either increased the time spent in front of the cage by males and females or (5.6mg/kg) increased the proximity measure of females. COMPARING WITH EXISTING METHOD: Our method prevents partners from influencing the target rat's social behavior; existing methods do not. Also, it is more sensitive to the effect of chlordiazepoxide than the broadly used method proposed by File and Hyde (1978). CONCLUSIONS: Proximity is an advantageous measure: it allows the assessment of only one focal animal without the interference of a partner; it is simple to take; it requires little interpretation skills or training from the experimenter, no special equipment or conditions.
Authors: Lorenz S Neuwirth; Michael T Verrengia; Zachary I Harikinish-Murrary; Jessica E Orens; Oscar E Lopez Journal: Front Mol Neurosci Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 6.261