Literature DB >> 28847475

Outcomes of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients With Early Molecular Response at 3 and 6 Months: A Comparative Analysis of Generic Imatinib and Glivec.

Ahmet Emre Eskazan1, Sevil Sadri1, Dilek Keskin1, Mesut Ayer2, Bulent Kantarcioglu3, Naciye Demirel3, Demet Aydin3, Fuat Aydinli4, Osman Yokus4, Isil Erdogan Ozunal1, Selin Berk1, Fevzi Firat Yalniz1, Tugrul Elverdi1, Ayse Salihoglu1, Muhlis Cem Ar1, Seniz Ongoren5, Zafer Baslar1, Yildiz Aydin1, Nukhet Tuzuner6, Ugur Ozbek7, Teoman Soysal8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The molecular response at 3 months of the original imatinib (OI) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia has prognostic significance; however, this has never been tested for generic imatinib (GI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the BCR-ABL1 [international reporting scale (IS)] transcript levels at 3 and 6 months to determine whether an early molecular response (EMR) had a prognostic effect on the outcome among chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving GI. Ninety patients were divided into 2 groups, according to the imatinib they received, as OI (group A) and GI (group B).
RESULTS: Two groups were equally balanced for age, gender, Sokal risk score, and optimal response. The 2 groups did not differ in achieving an EMR at 3 months, and patients with EMR at 3 months had significantly superior complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response rates compared with patients who did not achieve an EMR in both groups. The percentage of an optimal response [BCR-ABL1 (IS), < 1%] and a warning response [BCR-ABL1 (IS), 1%-10%] at 6 months was 93% and 95% for groups A and B, respectively (P = .553). Patients with an optimal response (OR) at both 3 and 6 months had significantly superior event-free survival rates compared with patients without an OR in groups A and B.
CONCLUSION: The results of the present study have demonstrated most probably for the first time that an OR at 3 and 6 months in patients receiving either first-line GI and OI is clearly associated with greater response and event-free survival rates. Prospective randomized trials with larger numbers of patients and longer follow-up periods are needed to address the effect of EMR in patients receiving GI.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCR-ABL1; CML; Generic imatinib; Outcome; Response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28847475     DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.07.255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk        ISSN: 2152-2669


  6 in total

1.  The tolerability issue of generic imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (Comment on Adi J. Klil-Drori et al., Haematologica 2019;104(7):e293).

Authors:  Ahmet Emre Eskazan; Teoman Soysal
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  Guidelines for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia from the NCCN and ELN: differences and similarities.

Authors:  Zehra Narlı Özdemir; Necati Alp Kılıçaslan; Musa Yılmaz; Ahmet Emre Eşkazan
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.319

3.  Use of generic imatinib as first-line treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): the GIMS (Glivec to Imatinib Switch) study.

Authors:  Maria Gemelli; Elena Maria Elli; Chiara Elena; Alessandra Iurlo; Tamara Intermesoli; Margherita Maffioli; Ester Pungolino; Maria Cristina Carraro; Mariella D'Adda; Francesca Lunghi; Michela Anghileri; Nicola Polverelli; Marianna Rossi; Mattia Bacciocchi; Elisa Bono; Cristina Bucelli; Francesco Passamonti; Laura Antolini; Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini
Journal:  Blood Res       Date:  2020-09-30

4.  Efficacy and safety profile of generic imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia-chronic phase: sharing experience of a hemato-oncology center from eastern India.

Authors:  Abhijit Phukan; Prakas Kumar Mandal; Tuphan K Dolai
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.673

5.  Efficacy and safety of generic imatinib after switching from original imatinib in patients treated for chronic myeloid leukemia in the United States.

Authors:  Iman Abou Dalle; Hagop Kantarjian; Jan Burger; Zeev Estrov; Maro Ohanian; Srdan Verstovsek; Farhad Ravandi; Gautam Borthakur; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Elias Jabbour; Jorge Cortes
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 6.  European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  A Hochhaus; M Baccarani; R T Silver; C Schiffer; J F Apperley; F Cervantes; R E Clark; J E Cortes; M W Deininger; F Guilhot; H Hjorth-Hansen; T P Hughes; J J W M Janssen; H M Kantarjian; D W Kim; R A Larson; J H Lipton; F X Mahon; J Mayer; F Nicolini; D Niederwieser; F Pane; J P Radich; D Rea; J Richter; G Rosti; P Rousselot; G Saglio; S Saußele; S Soverini; J L Steegmann; A Turkina; A Zaritskey; R Hehlmann
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 11.528

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.