Rosemary Nabaweesi1, Raghu H Ramakrishnaiah2, Mary E Aitken3, Mallikarjuna R Rettiganti4, Chunqiao Luo4, Robert T Maxson5, Charles M Glasier2, Phillip J Kenney6, James M Robbins3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas; Arkansas Children's Research Institute, Little Rock, Arkansas. Electronic address: rnabaweesi@uams.edu. 2. Department of Pediatric Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas; Arkansas Children's Research Institute, Little Rock, Arkansas. 4. Arkansas Children's Research Institute, Little Rock, Arkansas; Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas. 5. Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas. 6. Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Use of cranial CT scans in children has been increasing, in part due to increased awareness of sports-related concussions. CT is the largest contributor to medical radiation exposure, a risk factor for cancer. Long-term cancer risks of CT scans can be two to three times higher for children than for adults because children are more radiosensitive and have a longer lifetime in which to accumulate exposure from multiple scans. STUDY AIM: To compare the radiation exposure injured children receive when imaged at nonpediatric hospitals (NPHs) versus pediatric hospitals. METHODS: Injured children younger than 18 years who received a CT scan at a referring hospital during calendar years (CYs) 2010 and 2013 were included. Patient-level factors included demographics, mode of transportation, and Injury Severity Score, and hospital-level factors included region of state, radiology services, and hospital type and size. Our primary outcome of interest was the effective radiation dose. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-seven children were transferred to the pediatric trauma center during CYs 2010 and 2013, with a median age of 7.2 years (interquartile range 5-13). The median effective radiation dose received at NPHs was twice that received at the pediatric trauma center (3.8 versus 1.6 mSv, P < .001). Results were confirmed in independent and paired analyses, after controlling for mode of transportation, emergency department disposition, level of injury severity, and at the NPH trauma center level, hospital type, size, region, and radiology services location. CONCLUSION: NPHs have the potential to substantially reduce the medical radiation received by injured children. Pediatric CT protocols should be considered.
BACKGROUND: Use of cranial CT scans in children has been increasing, in part due to increased awareness of sports-related concussions. CT is the largest contributor to medical radiation exposure, a risk factor for cancer. Long-term cancer risks of CT scans can be two to three times higher for children than for adults because children are more radiosensitive and have a longer lifetime in which to accumulate exposure from multiple scans. STUDY AIM: To compare the radiation exposure injured children receive when imaged at nonpediatric hospitals (NPHs) versus pediatric hospitals. METHODS: Injured children younger than 18 years who received a CT scan at a referring hospital during calendar years (CYs) 2010 and 2013 were included. Patient-level factors included demographics, mode of transportation, and Injury Severity Score, and hospital-level factors included region of state, radiology services, and hospital type and size. Our primary outcome of interest was the effective radiation dose. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-seven children were transferred to the pediatric trauma center during CYs 2010 and 2013, with a median age of 7.2 years (interquartile range 5-13). The median effective radiation dose received at NPHs was twice that received at the pediatric trauma center (3.8 versus 1.6 mSv, P < .001). Results were confirmed in independent and paired analyses, after controlling for mode of transportation, emergency department disposition, level of injury severity, and at the NPH trauma center level, hospital type, size, region, and radiology services location. CONCLUSION: NPHs have the potential to substantially reduce the medical radiation received by injured children. Pediatric CT protocols should be considered.