Literature DB >> 28846984

Household air pollution and personal inhalation exposure to particles (TSP/PM2.5/PM1.0/PM0.25) in rural Shanxi, North China.

Ye Huang1, Wei Du1, Yuanchen Chen2, Guofeng Shen3, Shu Su1, Nan Lin1, Huizhong Shen1, Dan Zhu1, Chenyi Yuan1, Yonghong Duan4, Junfeng Liu1, Bengang Li1, Shu Tao1.   

Abstract

Personal exposure to size-segregated particles among rural residents in Shanxi, China in summer, 2011 were investigated using portable carried samplers (N = 84). Household air pollution was simultaneously studied using stationary samplers in nine homes. Information on household fuel types, cooking activity, smoking behavior, kitchen ventilation conditions etc., were also collected and discussed. The study found that even in the summer period, the daily average concentrations of PM2.5 and PM1.0 in the kitchen were as high as 376 ± 573 and 288 ± 397 μg/m3 (N = 6), that were nearly 3 times of 114 ± 81 and 97 ± 77 μg/m3 in the bedroom (N = 8), and significantly higher than those of 64 ± 28 and 47 ± 21 μg/m3 in the outdoor air (N = 6). The personal daily exposure to PM2.5 and PM1.0 were 98 ± 52 and 77 ± 47 μg/m3, respectively, that were lower than the concentrations in the kitchen but higher than the outdoor levels. The mass fractions of PM2.5 in TSP were 90%, 72%, 65% and 68% on average in the kitchen, bedroom, outdoor air and personal inhalation exposure, respectively, and moreover, a majority of particles in PM2.5 had diameters less than 1.0 μm. Calculated time-weighted average exposure based on indoor and outdoor air concentrations and time spent indoor and outdoor were positively correlated but, was ∼33% lower than the directly measured exposure. The daily exposure among those burning traditional solid fuels could be lower by ∼41% if the kitchen was equipped with an outdoor chimney, but was still 8-14% higher than those household using cleaning energies, like electricity and gas. With a ventilator in the kitchen, the exposure among the population using clean energies could be further reduced by 10-24%.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Household energies; Influencing factor; Inhalation exposure; PM(1.0); PM(2.5); Size distribution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28846984     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  7 in total

1.  Modeling the potential health benefits of lower household air pollution after a hypothetical liquified petroleum gas (LPG) cookstove intervention.

Authors:  Kyle Steenland; Ajay Pillarisetti; Miles Kirby; Jennifer Peel; Maggie Clark; Will Checkley; Howard H Chang; Thomas Clasen
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Solid Fuel Use and Incident COPD in Chinese Adults: Findings from the China Kadoorie Biobank.

Authors:  Jiachen Li; Chenxi Qin; Jun Lv; Yu Guo; Zheng Bian; Weiwei Zhou; Jianming Hu; Yidan Zhang; Junshi Chen; Weihua Cao; Canqing Yu; Liming Li
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Impact of biomass fuel exposure from traditional stoves on lung functions in adult women of a rural Indian village.

Authors:  Utkarsha Pathak; Rohit Kumar; Tejas M Suri; J C Suri; N C Gupta; Sharmishtha Pathak
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

4.  Chemical Investigation of Household Solid Fuel Use and Outdoor Air Pollution Contributions to Personal PM2.5 Exposures.

Authors:  Alexandra Lai; Martha Lee; Ellison Carter; Queenie Chan; Paul Elliott; Majid Ezzati; Frank Kelly; Li Yan; Yangfeng Wu; Xudong Yang; Liancheng Zhao; Jill Baumgartner; James J Schauer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Spatiotemporal Variation and Influencing Factors of TSP and Anions in Coastal Atmosphere of Zhanjiang City, China.

Authors:  Ji-Biao Zhang; Yu-Mei Rong; Qi-Feng Yin; Peng Zhang; Li-Rong Zhao; Chun-Liang Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Field measurements of indoor and community air quality in rural Beijing before, during, and after the COVID-19 lockdown.

Authors:  Xiaoying Li; Jill Baumgartner; Sam Harper; Xiang Zhang; Talia Sternbach; Christopher Barrington-Leigh; Collin Brehmer; Brian Robinson; Guofeng Shen; Yuanxun Zhang; Shu Tao; Ellison Carter
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 6.554

7.  Characteristics and risk assessment of occupational exposure to ultrafine particles generated from cooking in the Chinese restaurant.

Authors:  Xiangjing Gao; Meibian Zhang; Hua Zou; Zanrong Zhou; Weiming Yuan; Changjian Quan; Yiyao Cao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.