Literature DB >> 28846865

Insulin glargine and its two active metabolites: A sensitive (16pM) and robust simultaneous hybrid assay coupling immunoaffinity purification with LC-MS/MS to support biosimilar clinical studies.

Yang Xu1, Li Sun2, Melanie Anderson2, Philippe Bélanger3, Vincent Trinh3, Patricia Lavallée3, Bhavna Kantesaria2, Marie-Josée Marcoux3, Sheila Breidinger2, Kevin P Bateman2, Dina Goykhman2, Eric J Woolf2.   

Abstract

MK-1293 is a newly approved follow-on/biosimilar insulin glargine for the treatment of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetics. To support pivotal clinical studies during biosimilar evaluation, a sensitive, specific and robust liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay for the simultaneous quantification of glargine and its two active metabolites, M1 and M2 were developed. Strategies to overcome analytical challenges, so as to optimize assay sensitivity and improve ruggedness, were evolved, resulting in a fully validated LC-MS/MS method with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) at 0.1ng/mL (∼16pM, equivalent to ∼2.8μU/mL) for glargine, M1 and M2, respectively, using 0.5mL of human plasma. The assay employed hybrid methodology that combined immunoaffinity purification and reversed-phase chromatography followed by electrospray-MS/MS detection operated under positive ionization mode. Stable-isotope labeled 6[D10]Leu-glargine and 4[D10]Leu-M1 were used as internal standards. With a calibration range from 0.1 to 10ng/mL, the intra-run precision (n=5) and accuracy were <6.21%, and 96.9-102.1%, while the inter-run (n=5/run for 7days) precision and accuracy were <9.55% and 96.5-105.1%, respectively, for all 3 analytes. Matrix effect, recovery, analyte stability, and interferences from control matrix, potential concomitant medications and anti-drug antibody were assessed. The assay was fully automated and has been successfully used in support of biosimilar clinical studies. Greater than 94.3% of incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) results met acceptance criteria, demonstrating the robustness of the assay. The strategic considerations during method development and validation are discussed, and can be applied to quantification of other peptides, especially insulin analogs, in the future.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosimilar clinical studies; Hybrid method; Immunoaffinity purification (IAP); Insulin glargine and its active metabolites M1 and M2; LC–MS/MS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28846865     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci        ISSN: 1570-0232            Impact factor:   3.205


  2 in total

1.  Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Insulin Glargine Biosimilar Ezelin versus Originator Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Tri Juli Edi Tarigan; Adisti Dwijayanti; Susie Setyowati; Melva Louisa
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.168

2.  Commentary: Reduction in C-Peptide Levels and Influence on Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Insulin Preparations: How to Conduct a High-Quality Euglycemic Clamp Study.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Hongling Yu; Ting Li; Yerong Yu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 5.810

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.