Nicolas J Prat1, Andrew D Meyer, Nichole K Ingalls, Julie Trichereau, Joseph J DuBose, Andrew P Cap. 1. From the Coagulation and Blood Research (N.J.P., A.D.M., A.P.C.), United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR), Fort Sam Houston, Texas; French Armed Forces Institute of Biomedical Research (IRBA) (N.J.P., J.T.), Paris, France; Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics (A.D.M.), University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas; Northwest Surgical Specialists LLP (N.K.I.), Springfield, Oregon; and Travis Air Force Base (J.J.D.); and University of California (J.J.D.), Davis, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Up to 40% of combat casualties with a truncal injury die of massive hemorrhage before reaching a surgeon. This hemorrhage can be prevented with damage control resuscitation (DCR) methods, which are focused on replacing shed whole blood by empirically transfusing blood components in a 1:1:1:1 ratio of platelets:fresh frozen plasma:erythrocytes:cryoprecipitate (PLT:FFP:RBC:CRYO). Measurement of hemostatic function with rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may allow optimization of the type and quantity of blood products transfused. Our hypothesis was that incorporating ROTEM measurements into DCR methods at the US Role 3 hospital at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan would change the standard transfusion ratios of 1:1:1:1 to a product mix tailored specifically for the combat causality. METHODS: This retrospective study collected data from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry to compare transfusion practices and outcomes before and after ROTEM deployment to Bagram Airfield. Over the course of six months, 134 trauma patients received a transfusion (pre-ROTEM) and 85 received a transfusion and underwent ROTEM testing (post-ROTEM). Trauma teams received instruction on ROTEM use and interpretation, with no provision of a specific transfusion protocol, to supplement their clinical judgment and practice. RESULTS: The pre and post groups were not significantly different in terms of mortality, massive transfusion protocol activation, mean injury severity score, or coagulation measurements. Despite the difference in size, each group received an equal total number of transfusions. However, the post-ROTEM group received a significant increase in PLT and CRYO transfusions ratios, 4× and 2×, respectively. CONCLUSION: The introduction of ROTEM significantly improved adherence to DCR practices. The transfusion differences suggest that aggressive DCR without thromboelastometry data may result in reduced hemostatic support and underestimate the need for PLT and CRYO. Thus, future controlled trials should include ROTEM-guided coagulation management in trauma resuscitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level IV.
BACKGROUND: Up to 40% of combat casualties with a truncal injury die of massive hemorrhage before reaching a surgeon. This hemorrhage can be prevented with damage control resuscitation (DCR) methods, which are focused on replacing shed whole blood by empirically transfusing blood components in a 1:1:1:1 ratio of platelets:fresh frozen plasma:erythrocytes:cryoprecipitate (PLT:FFP:RBC:CRYO). Measurement of hemostatic function with rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may allow optimization of the type and quantity of blood products transfused. Our hypothesis was that incorporating ROTEM measurements into DCR methods at the US Role 3 hospital at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan would change the standard transfusion ratios of 1:1:1:1 to a product mix tailored specifically for the combat causality. METHODS: This retrospective study collected data from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry to compare transfusion practices and outcomes before and after ROTEM deployment to Bagram Airfield. Over the course of six months, 134 traumapatients received a transfusion (pre-ROTEM) and 85 received a transfusion and underwent ROTEM testing (post-ROTEM). Trauma teams received instruction on ROTEM use and interpretation, with no provision of a specific transfusion protocol, to supplement their clinical judgment and practice. RESULTS: The pre and post groups were not significantly different in terms of mortality, massive transfusion protocol activation, mean injury severity score, or coagulation measurements. Despite the difference in size, each group received an equal total number of transfusions. However, the post-ROTEM group received a significant increase in PLT and CRYO transfusions ratios, 4× and 2×, respectively. CONCLUSION: The introduction of ROTEM significantly improved adherence to DCR practices. The transfusion differences suggest that aggressive DCR without thromboelastometry data may result in reduced hemostatic support and underestimate the need for PLT and CRYO. Thus, future controlled trials should include ROTEM-guided coagulation management in trauma resuscitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level IV.
Authors: John B Holcomb; Don Jenkins; Peter Rhee; Jay Johannigman; Peter Mahoney; Sumeru Mehta; E Darrin Cox; Michael J Gehrke; Greg J Beilman; Martin Schreiber; Stephen F Flaherty; Kurt W Grathwohl; Phillip C Spinella; Jeremy G Perkins; Alec C Beekley; Neil R McMullin; Myung S Park; Ernest A Gonzalez; Charles E Wade; Michael A Dubick; C William Schwab; Fred A Moore; Howard R Champion; David B Hoyt; John R Hess Journal: J Trauma Date: 2007-02
Authors: John B Holcomb; Barbara C Tilley; Sarah Baraniuk; Erin E Fox; Charles E Wade; Jeanette M Podbielski; Deborah J del Junco; Karen J Brasel; Eileen M Bulger; Rachael A Callcut; Mitchell Jay Cohen; Bryan A Cotton; Timothy C Fabian; Kenji Inaba; Jeffrey D Kerby; Peter Muskat; Terence O'Keeffe; Sandro Rizoli; Bryce R H Robinson; Thomas M Scalea; Martin A Schreiber; Deborah M Stein; Jordan A Weinberg; Jeannie L Callum; John R Hess; Nena Matijevic; Christopher N Miller; Jean-Francois Pittet; David B Hoyt; Gail D Pearson; Brian Leroux; Gerald van Belle Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Matthew J Delano; Sandro B Rizoli; Shawn G Rhind; Joseph Cuschieri; Wolfgang Junger; Andrew J Baker; Michael A Dubick; David B Hoyt; Eileen M Bulger Journal: Shock Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: H Tauber; P Innerhofer; R Breitkopf; I Westermann; R Beer; R El Attal; A Strasak; M Mittermayr Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Matthew A Borgman; Philip C Spinella; Jeremy G Perkins; Kurt W Grathwohl; Thomas Repine; Alec C Beekley; James Sebesta; Donald Jenkins; Charles E Wade; John B Holcomb Journal: J Trauma Date: 2007-10
Authors: Ernest E Moore; Hunter B Moore; Michael P Chapman; Eduardo Gonzalez; Angela Sauaia Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Ernest E Moore; Hunter B Moore; Lucy Z Kornblith; Matthew D Neal; Maureane Hoffman; Nicola J Mutch; Herbert Schöchl; Beverley J Hunt; Angela Sauaia Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 65.038
Authors: Ji Soo Kim; Il Jae Wang; Seok Ran Yeom; Suck Ju Cho; Jae Hun Kim; June Pill Seok; Seong Hwa Lee; Byung Gwan Bae; Mun Ki Min Journal: Acute Crit Care Date: 2018-08-31
Authors: Klaus Görlinger; Antonio Pérez-Ferrer; Daniel Dirkmann; Fuat Saner; Marc Maegele; Ángel Augusto Pérez Calatayud; Tae-Yop Kim Journal: Korean J Anesthesiol Date: 2019-05-17
Authors: Klemens Horst; Rachel Lentzen; Martin Tonglet; Ümit Mert; Philipp Lichte; Christian D Weber; Philipp Kobbe; Nicole Heussen; Frank Hildebrand Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Alexander Ziebart; Robert Ruemmler; Christian Möllmann; Jens Kamuf; Andreas Garcia-Bardon; Serge C Thal; Erik K Hartmann Journal: PeerJ Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: James H Lantry; Phillip Mason; Matthew G Logsdon; Connor M Bunch; Ethan E Peck; Ernest E Moore; Hunter B Moore; Matthew D Neal; Scott G Thomas; Rashid Z Khan; Laura Gillespie; Charles Florance; Josh Korzan; Fletcher R Preuss; Dan Mason; Tarek Saleh; Mathew K Marsee; Stefani Vande Lune; Qamarnisa Ayoub; Dietmar Fries; Mark M Walsh Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 4.241