Literature DB >> 28846559

Sofosbuvir-Based Regimens in HIV/HCV Coinfected Patients After Liver Transplantation: Results From the ANRS CO23 CUPILT Study.

Teresa Maria Antonini1,2,3,4, Audrey Coilly1,2,3,4, Emilie Rossignol5,6, Claire Fougerou-Leurent5,6, Jérôme Dumortier7,8, Vincent Leroy9,10, Aurélie Veislinger5,6, Sylvie Radenne11, Danielle Botta-Fridlund12, François Durand13, Pauline Houssel-Debry14, Nassim Kamar15,16,17, Valérie Canva18, Philippe Perré19, Victor De Ledinghen20, Alexandra Rohel21, Alpha Diallo21, Anne-Marie Taburet4,22,23, Didier Samuel1,2,3,4, Georges-Philippe Pageaux24,25, Jean-Charles Duclos-Vallée1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation affects survival in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV coinfected patients. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens in HIV/HCV coinfected patients after liver transplantation.
METHODS: Twenty-nine HIV/HCV coinfected transplanted patients receiving tacrolimus-, cyclosporine-, or everolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy were enrolled in the Compassionate Use of Protease Inhibitors in Viral C Liver Transplantation cohort. Their antiviral treatment combined SOF, daclatasvir with or without ribavirin (n = 10/n = 6), or SOF, ledipasvir with or without ribavirin (n = 2/n = 11).
RESULTS: The median delay between liver transplantation and treatment initiation was 37.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 14.4-99.2). The breakdown of HCV genotypes was G1, 22 patients (75.9%); G3, 3 patients (10.3%); and G4, 4 patients (13.8%). The treatment indications were HCV recurrence (≥ F1 n = 23) or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (n = 6). Before starting SOF, the HCV viral load and CD4 count were 6.7 log10 IU/mL (IQR, 5.9-7.2) and 342 cells/mm (IQR, 172-483), respectively. At week 4, the HCV viral load was less than 15 IU/mL in 12 (42.9%) patients. The overall sustained virological response 12 was 96.6%. No significant drug-drug interactions were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: SOF-based treatment regimens produced excellent results in HIV/HCV coinfected patients after liver transplantation, suggesting an important change in their prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28846559     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  4 in total

Review 1.  Solid Organ Transplantation in HIV-Infected Recipients: History, Progress, and Frontiers.

Authors:  William A Werbel; Christine M Durand
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.071

2.  Nonviral liver disease is the leading indication for liver transplant in the United States in persons living with human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  Isabel Campos-Varela; Jennifer L Dodge; Norah A Terrault; Danielle Brandman; Jennifer C Price
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 9.369

3.  Living donor domino liver transplantation in a hepatitis C virus/human immunodeficiency virus-coinfected hemophilia patient: a case report.

Authors:  Hidekazu Yamamoto; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Yuzuru Sambommatsu; Keita Shimata; Daiki Yoshii; Kaori Isono; Masaki Honda; Taro Yamashita; Shuzo Matsushita; Yukihiro Inomata; Taizo Hibi
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-29

4.  High Cure Rates for Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 6 in Advanced Liver Fibrosis With 12 Weeks Sofosbuvir and Daclatasvir: The Vietnam SEARCH Study.

Authors:  Barnaby Flower; Leanne McCabe; Chau Le Ngoc; Hung Le Manh; Phuong Le Thanh; Thuan Dang Trong; Thu Vo Thi; Hang Vu Thi Kim; Thanh Nguyen Tat; Dao Phan Thi Hong; An Nguyen Thi Chau; Tan Dinh Thi; Nga Tran Thi Tuyet; Joel Tarning; Cherry Kingsley; Evelyne Kestelyn; Sarah L Pett; Guy Thwaites; Vinh Chau Nguyen Van; David Smith; Eleanor Barnes; M Azim Ansari; Hugo Turner; Motiur Rahman; Ann Sarah Walker; Jeremy Day; Graham S Cooke
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.835

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.