Literature DB >> 28846532

Randomized Trial of Sternal Closure for Low Risk Patients: Rigid Fixation versus Wire Closure.

Graham Peigh1, Jeevan Kumar1, Shinya Unai1, Diehl T James1, Hitoshi Hirose1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A previous retrospective analysis of our cardiac surgery patients showed shortened ventilation time and hospital stay among patients receiving rigid sternal fixation compared to sternal wire fixation. We performed a prospective randomized study to further investigate these outcomes and determine if rigid closure can provide reduced pain after cardiac surgery.
METHODS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery between July 2011 and May 2014 were prospectively randomized into wire closure (Group C) or rigid fixation using sternal plates (Group R) groups. Age above 80, emergency surgery, redo sternotomy, and immunosuppression were among major exclusion criteria precluding randomization.  Intubation time was recorded for all patients. Pain scores were determined daily from postoperative day 1 until day 5 at 6 a.m. using a numeric rating scale. Narcotic pain medication requirements from day 1 to 5 were collected and converted into intravenous morphine equivalents.
RESULTS: Of 80 patients, 39 patients were in Group R (average age 65 ± 8; 31 male and 8 female) and 41 patients were in Group C (average age 66 ± 9; 34 male and 7 female).  Group R patients had a higher body mass index than patients in Group C (Group R: 31 ± 5; Group C: 29 ± 5; P = .04). No significant differences in the end points of intubation time and postoperative pain were observed. 
Conclusion: This randomized study of cardiac surgery patients showed no significant benefits of rigid fixation over conventional sternal wire closure with regard to intubation time, postoperative pain, or length of hospital stay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rigid fixation; Sternal closure; cardiac surgery.; postoperative pain

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28846532     DOI: 10.1532/hsf.1860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Surg Forum        ISSN: 1098-3511            Impact factor:   0.676


  3 in total

1.  Sternal reconstruction after post-sternotomy dehiscence and mediastinitis.

Authors:  Andrea Dell'Amore; Stefano Congiu; Alessio Campisi; Sara Mazzarra; Silvia Zanoni; Domenica Giunta
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-02

2.  Comparison of polyetheretherketone cables and stainless steel wires for sternal fixation after median sternotomy.

Authors:  Duanchao Shu; Jianpeng Li; Yixin Zhao; Yan Yang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  Analysis of sternal healing after median sternotomy in low risk patients at midterm follow-up: retrospective cohort study from two centres.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Dapu He; Min Wang; Yongxiang Qian; Youran Lu; Xinping Shi; Yang Liu; Xianghong Zhan; Dongmei Di; Kai Zhu; Xiaoying Zhang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 1.637

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.