Literature DB >> 28846495

Immediate Allergic Reactions to Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ashkan Heshmatzadeh Behzadi1, Yize Zhao1, Zerwa Farooq1, Martin R Prince1.   

Abstract

Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if there are differences in rates of immediate allergic events between classes of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). Materials and Methods PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies in which rates of immediate adverse events to GBCAs were reported. The American College of Radiology classification system was used to characterize allergic-like events as mild, moderate, or severe, and the total number of administrations of each GBCA was recorded. Where necessary, authors of studies were contacted to clarify data and eliminate physiologic reactions. Relative risks of GBCA types were estimated by using the Mantel-Haenszel type method. Results Nine studies in which immediate reactions to GBCA were recorded from a total of 716 978 administrations of GBCA met the criteria for inclusion and exclusion. The overall rate of patients who had immediate allergic-like reactions was 9.2 per 10 000 administrations and the overall rate of severe immediate allergic-like reactions was 0.52 per 10 000 administrations.. The nonionic linear chelate gadodiamide had the lowest rate of reactions, at 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74, 2.4) per 10 000 administrations, which was significantly less than that of linear ionic GBCAs at 8.3 (95% CI: 7.5, 9.2) per 10 000 administrations (relative risk, 0.19 [95% CI: 0.099, 0.36]; P < .00001) and less than that for nonionic macrocyclic GBCAs at 16 (95% CI: 14, 19) per 10 000 administrations (relative risk, 0.12 [95% CI: 0.05, 0.31]; P < .001). GBCAs known to be associated with protein binding had a higher rate of reactions, at 17 (95% CI: 15, 20) per 10 000 administrations compared with the same chelate classification without protein binding, at 5.2 (95% CI: 4.5, 6.0) per 10 000 administrations (relative risk, 3.1 [95% CI: 2.4, 3.8]; P < .0001). Conclusion These data show the lowest rate of immediate allergic adverse events with use of the nonionic linear GBCA gadodiamide in comparison with those of ionic linear or nonionic macrocyclic GBCAs. A higher rate of immediate allergic adverse events was associated with ionicity, protein binding, and macrocyclic structure. © RSNA, 2017 An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on August 31, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28846495     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  21 in total

Review 1.  Practical administration of intravenous contrast media in children: screening, prophylaxis, administration and treatment of adverse reactions.

Authors:  Ezekiel Maloney; Ramesh S Iyer; Grace S Phillips; Shina Menon; John J Lee; Michael J Callahan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29

2.  Gadolinium Deposition Safety: Seeking the Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  C A Mallio; C C Quattrocchi; À Rovira; P M Parizel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Risk of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis in Patients With Stage 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving a Group II Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sean A Woolen; Prasad R Shankar; Joel J Gagnier; Mark P MacEachern; Lisa Singer; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 4.  Safety considerations related to intravenous contrast agents in pediatric imaging.

Authors:  Safia H E Cheeney; Ezekiel Maloney; Ramesh S Iyer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-08-09

Review 5.  Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents: Updates and Answers to Typical Questions Regarding Gadolinium Use.

Authors:  Benjamin Y C Cheong; James M Wilson; Ourania A Preventza; Raja Muthupillai
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2022-05-01

6.  Contrast Media Adverse Drug Reactions in Highly Polluted Environment.

Authors:  Natalia Sauer; Wojciech Szlasa; Laura Jonderko; Krystyna Głowacka; Katarzyna Karłowicz-Bodalska; Anna Wiela-Hojeńska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Qualitative evaluation of MRI features of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor: results from a multicenter study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nardo; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Francesco Acquafredda; Silvia Schirò; Andrew L Wong; Dani Sarohia; Roberto Maroldi; Morgan A Darrow; Michele Guindani; Sonia Lee; Michelle Zhang; Ahmed W Moawad; Khaled M Elsayes; Ramsey D Badawi; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Can the lower rate of CT- or MRI-related adverse drug reactions to contrast media due to stricter limitations on patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT or MRI?

Authors:  Takahiro Maeda; Masafumi Oda; Shinji Kito; Tatsurou Tanaka; Nao Wakasugi-Sato; Shinobu Matsumoto-Takeda; Takaaki Joujima; Yuichi Miyamura; Koichi Kiyota; Kensuke Tsutsumi; Yasuhiro Morimoto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 9.  Gadolinium Retention: A Research Roadmap from the 2018 NIH/ACR/RSNA Workshop on Gadolinium Chelates.

Authors:  Robert J McDonald; Deborah Levine; Jeffrey Weinreb; Emanuel Kanal; Matthew S Davenport; James H Ellis; Paula M Jacobs; Robert E Lenkinski; Kenneth R Maravilla; Martin R Prince; Howard A Rowley; Michael F Tweedle; Herbert Y Kressel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Prospective multicenter assessment of patient preferences for properties of gadolinium-based contrast media and their potential socioeconomic impact in a screening breast MRI setting.

Authors:  Sean A Woolen; Jonathan P Troost; Shokoufeh Khalatbari; Akshat C Pujara; Jennifer S McDonald; Robert J McDonald; Prasad Shankar; Alana A Lewin; Amy N Melsaether; Steven M Westphal; Katherine H Patterson; Ashley Nettles; John P Welby; Parth Pradip Patel; Neud Kiros; Lisa Piccoli; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.