Christian Ott1, Christoph Kopp1, Anke Dahlmann1, Axel Schmid2, Peter Linz1, Alexander Cavallaro2, Matthias Hammon2, Tilmann Ditting1, Roland Veelken1, Michael Uder2, Jens Titze3, Roland E Schmieder4. 1. Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. 2. Department of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany. 3. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. 4. Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. roland.schmieder@uk-erlangen.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Renal denervation (RDN) has been introduced for reducing blood pressure (BP) in treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH). The precise mechanism how RDN exerts its BP-lowering effects are not yet fully understood. It is widely accepted that sodium (Na+) plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of hypertensive disease. However, there is increasing evidence of osmotically inactive Na+ storage. We investigated the impact of RDN on Na+ homeostasis using estimation of salt intake, and measurement of tissue Na+ content. METHODS: In a study 41 patients with TRH (office BP ≥140/90 mmHg and diagnosis confirmed by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring) underwent RDN. Tissue Na+ content was assessed non-invasively with 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging before and 6 months after RDN. In addition, 24-h urinary Na+ excretion as an estimate of salt intake and spot urine Na+/K+ excretion were assessed. The study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT01687725). RESULTS: There was a significant fall in BP (office: -17 ± 20/-10 ± 12 mmHg; 24-h: -11 ± 13/-6 ± 9 mmHg, all p < 0.001) 6 months after RDN. In contrast, tissue Na+ content of the muscle (20.1 ± 3.9 vs. 20.7 ± 4.0 mmol/L, p = 0.229) and skin (24.4 ± 6.5 vs. 24.8 ± 6.6 mmol/L, p = 0.695) did not change after RDN. Moreover, there was also no change in salt intake after RDN, whereas Na+/K+ ratio only acutely increased. CONCLUSIONS: Although RDN resulted in a substantial reduction of BP, tissue Na+ content of the muscle and skin was not mobilized and reduced. These data indicate that the BP reduction after RDN is unrelated to Na+ homeostasis.
OBJECTIVES: Renal denervation (RDN) has been introduced for reducing blood pressure (BP) in treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH). The precise mechanism how RDN exerts its BP-lowering effects are not yet fully understood. It is widely accepted that sodium (Na+) plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of hypertensive disease. However, there is increasing evidence of osmotically inactive Na+ storage. We investigated the impact of RDN on Na+ homeostasis using estimation of salt intake, and measurement of tissue Na+ content. METHODS: In a study 41 patients with TRH (office BP ≥140/90 mmHg and diagnosis confirmed by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring) underwent RDN. Tissue Na+ content was assessed non-invasively with 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging before and 6 months after RDN. In addition, 24-h urinary Na+ excretion as an estimate of salt intake and spot urine Na+/K+ excretion were assessed. The study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT01687725). RESULTS: There was a significant fall in BP (office: -17 ± 20/-10 ± 12 mmHg; 24-h: -11 ± 13/-6 ± 9 mmHg, all p < 0.001) 6 months after RDN. In contrast, tissue Na+ content of the muscle (20.1 ± 3.9 vs. 20.7 ± 4.0 mmol/L, p = 0.229) and skin (24.4 ± 6.5 vs. 24.8 ± 6.6 mmol/L, p = 0.695) did not change after RDN. Moreover, there was also no change in salt intake after RDN, whereas Na+/K+ ratio only acutely increased. CONCLUSIONS: Although RDN resulted in a substantial reduction of BP, tissue Na+ content of the muscle and skin was not mobilized and reduced. These data indicate that the BP reduction after RDN is unrelated to Na+ homeostasis.
Authors: Jens Titze; Friedrich C Luft; Katharina Bauer; Peter Dietsch; Rainer Lang; Roland Veelken; Hubertus Wagner; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Karl F Hilgers Journal: Hypertension Date: 2006-04-24 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Patricia M Kearney; Megan Whelton; Kristi Reynolds; Paul Muntner; Paul K Whelton; Jiang He Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jan 15-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Roland E Schmieder; Josep Redon; Guido Grassi; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Giuseppe Mancia; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Gianfranco Parati; Luis Ruilope; Philippe van de Borne; Costas Tsioufis Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Rosa L De Jager; Margreet F Sanders; Michiel L Bots; Melvin D Lobo; Sebastian Ewen; Martine M A Beeftink; Michael Böhm; Joost Daemen; Oliver Dörr; Dagmara Hering; Felix Mahfoud; Holger Nef; Christian Ott; Manish Saxena; Roland E Schmieder; Markus P Schlaich; Wilko Spiering; Pim A L Tonino; Willemien L Verloop; Eva E Vink; Evert-Jan Vonken; Michiel Voskuil; Stephen G Worthley; Peter J Blankestijn Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Felix Mahfoud; Roland E Schmieder; Michel Azizi; Atul Pathak; Horst Sievert; Costas Tsioufis; Thomas Zeller; Stefan Bertog; Peter J Blankestijn; Michael Böhm; Michel Burnier; Gilles Chatellier; Isabelle Durand Zaleski; Sebastian Ewen; Guido Grassi; Michael Joner; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Melvin D Lobo; Chaim Lotan; Thomas Felix Lüscher; Gianfranco Parati; Patrick Rossignol; Luis Ruilope; Faisal Sharif; Evert van Leeuwen; Massimo Volpe; Stephan Windecker; Adam Witkowski; William Wijns Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Mark Lipphardt; Michael J Koziolek; Luca-Yves Lehnig; Ann-Kathrin Schäfer; Gerhard A Müller; Stephan Lüders; Manuel Wallbach Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-04-06 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Roland E Schmieder; Karin Högerl; Susanne Jung; Peter Bramlage; Roland Veelken; Christian Ott Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Martin Steinmetz; Dominik Nelles; Jutta Weisser-Thomas; Christian Schaefer; Georg Nickenig; Nikos Werner Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Manuel Wallbach; Ellen Born; Deborah Kämpfer; Stephan Lüders; Gerhard A Müller; Rolf Wachter; Michael J Koziolek Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Kristina Rodionova; Karl F Hilgers; Peter Linz; Johannes Schätzl; Giulia Raschke; Christian Ott; Roland E Schmieder; Mario Schiffer; Kerstin Amann; Roland Veelken; Tilmann Ditting Journal: Pflugers Arch Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 3.657