Anchal Bansal1, Douglas Carlan2, John Moley1, Heather Goodson2, Charles A Goldfarb3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine at Barnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO. 2. Eaton Orthopedics, St. Petersburg, FL. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine at Barnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO. Electronic address: goldfarbc@wudosis.wustl.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of hook of the hamate excision for fracture in a large cohort of patients to better understand recovery time and complications. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients treated with surgical excision for hook of the hamate fractures at 2 different centers. We collected information on demographics, clinical presentation, and postoperative complications. Continuous outcome variables included time to surgery, return to play, and return to activity. RESULTS: Our cohort of 81 patients had a median age of 22 years and was composed of 74 athletes including 57 baseball players and 8 golfers. The median time to return to play was 6 weeks (range, 1-36 weeks) after surgery; 11 patients (14%) had a return at 12 weeks or longer. Seventy-eight patients returned to preinjury activity levels. Twelve patients with a full recovery continued to experience some level of intermittent, nonspecific pain in the affected hand, although this was not severe enough to require additional treatment. We observed a 25% incidence of postoperative complications with the majority consisting of transient ulnar nerve dysfunction. Complications were more common among nonathletes, those presenting with nonunions, and those experiencing longer intervals between injury and surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In most cases, surgical excision as treatment for hook of the hamate fractures is safe and allows a relatively rapid return to play. However, we found a higher incidence of complications, including transient ulnar nerve dysfunction, than has been previously reported. In addition, there is a group of patients with delayed return to play and continued discomfort after surgery. These findings should inform the discussion with surgical candidates. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of hook of the hamate excision for fracture in a large cohort of patients to better understand recovery time and complications. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients treated with surgical excision for hook of the hamate fractures at 2 different centers. We collected information on demographics, clinical presentation, and postoperative complications. Continuous outcome variables included time to surgery, return to play, and return to activity. RESULTS: Our cohort of 81 patients had a median age of 22 years and was composed of 74 athletes including 57 baseball players and 8 golfers. The median time to return to play was 6 weeks (range, 1-36 weeks) after surgery; 11 patients (14%) had a return at 12 weeks or longer. Seventy-eight patients returned to preinjury activity levels. Twelve patients with a full recovery continued to experience some level of intermittent, nonspecific pain in the affected hand, although this was not severe enough to require additional treatment. We observed a 25% incidence of postoperative complications with the majority consisting of transient ulnar nerve dysfunction. Complications were more common among nonathletes, those presenting with nonunions, and those experiencing longer intervals between injury and surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In most cases, surgical excision as treatment for hook of the hamate fractures is safe and allows a relatively rapid return to play. However, we found a higher incidence of complications, including transient ulnar nerve dysfunction, than has been previously reported. In addition, there is a group of patients with delayed return to play and continued discomfort after surgery. These findings should inform the discussion with surgical candidates. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
Authors: Brandon N Devers; Keith C Douglas; Rishi D Naik; Donald H Lee; Jeffry T Watson; Douglas R Weikert Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Veronique A J I M van Rijckevorsel; Caroline A Selles; Cornelis H van der Vlies; Berry I Cleffken; Niels W L Schep Journal: J Wrist Surg Date: 2019-08-30
Authors: Peter Charles Rhee; Christopher L Camp; John D'Angelo; Vishal S Desai; Steven S Shin; Donald Sheridan; Stan Conte Journal: Hand (N Y) Date: 2019-07-23
Authors: Liana J Tedesco; Hasani W Swindell; Forrest L Anderson; Eugene Jang; Tony T Wong; Jonathan K Kazam; R Kumar Kadiyala; Charles A Popkin Journal: Open Access J Sports Med Date: 2020-04-28
Authors: Lindsay S Flynn; George J Richard; Heather K Vincent; Michelle Bruner; Cong Chen; Robert C Matthias; Jason L Zaremski; Kevin W Farmer Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-12-13
Authors: Ian D Engler; Gustavo Barrazueta; Nicholas D Colacchio; David E Ruchelsman; Mark R Belsky; Matthew D Leibman Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2022-03-30