Literature DB >> 28844621

Serious and actionable risks, plus disclosure: Investigating an alternative approach for presenting risk information in prescription drug television advertisements.

Kevin R Betts1, Vanessa Boudewyns2, Kathryn J Aikin3, Claudia Squire4, Suzanne Dolina5, Jennifer J Hayes6, Brian G Southwell7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Broadcast direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug ads that present product claims are required to also present the product's major risks. Debate exists regarding how much information should be included in these major risk statements. Some argue that such statements expose people to unnecessary amounts of information, while others argue that they leave out important information.
OBJECTIVES: Examine the impact of type of risk statement (unedited versus serious and actionable risks only) and a disclosure indicating that not all risks are presented on consumers' ability to remember the important risks and benefits of a drug following exposure to a DTC television advertisement (ad). Risk and benefit perceptions, ad-prompted actions, recognition of the disclosure statement, and evaluations of both the disclosure and risk statement were also examined.
METHODS: A web-based experiment was conducted in which US adults who self-reported as having depression (N = 500), insomnia (N = 500), or high cholesterol (N = 500) were randomly assigned to view one of four versions of the television ad, and then complete a questionnaire.
RESULTS: The type of risk statement had a significant effect on risk recall and recognition, benefit recognition, perceived risk severity (depression condition only), and perceived benefit magnitude (high cholesterol condition only). Disclosure recognition (using bias-corrected scores) ranged from 63% to 70% across the three illness samples.
CONCLUSIONS: The revised risk statement improved overall processing of the television ad, as evidenced by improved risk recall and recognition and improved benefit recognition. Further, the presence of the disclosure did not adversely affect consumers' processing of drug risk and benefit information. Therefore, limiting the risks presented in DTC television ads and including a disclosure alerting consumers that not all risks are presented may be an effective strategy for communicating product risks. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising; Disclosures; Food and drug administration; Major statement; Prescription drugs; Risk communication

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28844621      PMCID: PMC9476830          DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  22 in total

Review 1.  One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; V J Strecher; B Glassman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1999

2.  Riskier than we think? The relationship between risk statement completeness and perceptions of direct to consumer advertised prescription drugs.

Authors:  J J Davis
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2000 Oct-Dec

Review 3.  Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance.

Authors:  Matthew W Kreuter; Ricardo J Wray
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

4.  Direct-to-consumer advertising: developing evidence-based policy to improve retention and comprehension.

Authors:  David L Riggs; Stacy M Holdsworth; David R McAvoy
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  The effect of qualifying language on perceptions of drug appeal, drug experience, and estimates of side-effect incidence in DTC advertising.

Authors:  Joel Davis
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2007 Oct-Nov

Review 6.  Insomnia: definition, prevalence, etiology, and consequences.

Authors:  Thomas Roth
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  Effect of presentation modality in direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug television advertisements.

Authors:  Michael S Wogalter; Eric F Shaver; Michael J Kalsher
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Do Prescription Drug Ads Tell Consumers Enough About Benefits and Side Effects? Results From the Health Information National Trends Survey, Fourth Administration.

Authors:  Helen W Sullivan; Miriam Campbell
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-06-29

9.  Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems.

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Susan E Assmann; Laura E Enos; Linda E Kasten
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Tailoring risk communication to improve comprehension: Do patient preferences help or hurt?

Authors:  Andrew J Barnes; Yaniv Hanoch; Talya Miron-Shatz; Elissa M Ozanne
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  5 in total

1.  Assessing the Inclusion of Foil Items in a Scale to Measure Recognition of Health Messages.

Authors:  Helen W Sullivan; Wen-Hung Chen; Kevin R Betts
Journal:  Commun Methods Meas       Date:  2021-07-03

2.  Taking Repeated Exposure into Account: An Experimental Study of Direct-To-Consumer Prescription Drug Television Ad Effects.

Authors:  Kevin R Betts; Kathryn J Aikin; Bridget J Kelly; Mihaela Johnson; Sarah Parvanta; Brian G Southwell; Nicole Mack; Janice Tzeng; Linda Cameron
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2019-04-29

3.  Development and validation of prescription drug risk, efficacy, and benefit perception measures in the context of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising.

Authors:  Bridget J Kelly; Douglas J Rupert; Kathryn J Aikin; Helen W Sullivan; Mihaela Johnson; Carla M Bann; Nicole Mack; Brian G Southwell; Sue West; Sarah Parvanta; Alexander Rabre; Susana Peinado
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2020-08-06

4.  What is the quality of drug safety information for patients: An analysis of REMS educational materials.

Authors:  Hilda W Chan; Andrea M Russell; Meredith Y Smith
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  The FDA's Diverse and Dynamic Activities in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: Advancing and Supporting Health Equity.

Authors:  Christine Lee; Melanie J McLean; Caroline J Huang; Anh Nguyen Zarndt; Kathryn J Aikin; Paula Rausch; Barbara R Cohen; Janine Delahanty; Danielle M Sholly; Wendy I Slavit; Ewa D Carlton
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.