Literature DB >> 28844499

Rindopepimut with temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed, EGFRvIII-expressing glioblastoma (ACT IV): a randomised, double-blind, international phase 3 trial.

Michael Weller1, Nicholas Butowski2, David D Tran3, Lawrence D Recht4, Michael Lim5, Hal Hirte6, Lynn Ashby7, Laszlo Mechtler8, Samuel A Goldlust9, Fabio Iwamoto10, Jan Drappatz11, Donald M O'Rourke12, Mark Wong13, Mark G Hamilton14, Gaetano Finocchiaro15, James Perry16, Wolfgang Wick17, Jennifer Green18, Yi He18, Christopher D Turner18, Michael J Yellin18, Tibor Keler18, Thomas A Davis18, Roger Stupp19, John H Sampson20.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rindopepimut (also known as CDX-110), a vaccine targeting the EGFR deletion mutation EGFRvIII, consists of an EGFRvIII-specific peptide conjugated to keyhole limpet haemocyanin. In the ACT IV study, we aimed to assess whether or not the addition of rindopepimut to standard chemotherapy is able to improve survival in patients with EGFRvIII-positive glioblastoma.
METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years and older with glioblastoma from 165 hospitals in 22 countries. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed glioblastoma confirmed to express EGFRvIII by central analysis, and had undergone maximal surgical resection and completion of standard chemoradiation without progression. Patients were stratified by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer recursive partitioning analysis class, MGMT promoter methylation, and geographical region, and randomly assigned (1:1) with a prespecified randomisation sequence (block size of four) to receive rindopepimut (500 μg admixed with 150 μg GM-CSF) or control (100 μg keyhole limpet haemocyanin) via monthly intradermal injection until progression or intolerance, concurrent with standard oral temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2 for 5 of 28 days) for 6-12 cycles or longer. Patients, investigators, and the trial funder were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival in patients with minimal residual disease (MRD; enhancing tumour <2 cm2 post-chemoradiation by central review), analysed by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01480479.
FINDINGS: Between April 12, 2012, and Dec 15, 2014, 745 patients were enrolled (405 with MRD, 338 with significant residual disease [SRD], and two unevaluable) and randomly assigned to rindopepimut and temozolomide (n=371) or control and temozolomide (n=374). The study was terminated for futility after a preplanned interim analysis. At final analysis, there was no significant difference in overall survival for patients with MRD: median overall survival was 20·1 months (95% CI 18·5-22·1) in the rindopepimut group versus 20·0 months (18·1-21·9) in the control group (HR 1·01, 95% CI 0·79-1·30; p=0·93). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events for all 369 treated patients in the rindopepimut group versus 372 treated patients in the control group were: thrombocytopenia (32 [9%] vs 23 [6%]), fatigue (six [2%] vs 19 [5%]), brain oedema (eight [2%] vs 11 [3%]), seizure (nine [2%] vs eight [2%]), and headache (six [2%] vs ten [3%]). Serious adverse events included seizure (18 [5%] vs 22 [6%]) and brain oedema (seven [2%] vs 12 [3%]). 16 deaths in the study were caused by adverse events (nine [4%] in the rindopepimut group and seven [3%] in the control group), of which one-a pulmonary embolism in a 64-year-old male patient after 11 months of treatment-was assessed as potentially related to rindopepimut.
INTERPRETATION: Rindopepimut did not increase survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Combination approaches potentially including rindopepimut might be required to show efficacy of immunotherapy in glioblastoma. FUNDING: Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28844499     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30517-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  308 in total

1.  MGMT Promoter Methylation Cutoff with Safety Margin for Selecting Glioblastoma Patients into Trials Omitting Temozolomide: A Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Monika E Hegi; Els Genbrugge; Thierry Gorlia; Roger Stupp; Mark R Gilbert; Olivier L Chinot; L Burt Nabors; Greg Jones; Wim Van Criekinge; Josef Straub; Michael Weller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Michael Weller; Eudocia Quant Lee; Brian M Alexander; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Floris P Barthel; Tracy T Batchelor; Ranjit S Bindra; Susan M Chang; E Antonio Chiocca; Timothy F Cloughesy; John F DeGroot; Evanthia Galanis; Mark R Gilbert; Monika E Hegi; Craig Horbinski; Raymond Y Huang; Andrew B Lassman; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Lim; Minesh P Mehta; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Giuseppe Minniti; David Nathanson; Michael Platten; Matthias Preusser; Patrick Roth; Marc Sanson; David Schiff; Susan C Short; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Jonathan Tsang; Roel G W Verhaak; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Gelareh Zadeh; David A Reardon; Kenneth D Aldape; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Glioblastoma vs temozolomide: can the red queen race be won?

Authors:  Anjali Arora; Kumaravel Somasundaram
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 4.  Vaccination in the immunotherapy of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ziren Kong; Yu Wang; Wenbin Ma
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Efficacy of EGFR plus TNF inhibition in a preclinical model of temozolomide-resistant glioblastoma.

Authors:  Gao Guo; Ke Gong; Vineshkumar Thidil Puliyappadamba; Nishah Panchani; Edward Pan; Bipasha Mukherjee; Ziba Damanwalla; Sabrina Bharia; Kimmo J Hatanpaa; David E Gerber; Bruce E Mickey; Toral R Patel; Jann N Sarkaria; Dawen Zhao; Sandeep Burma; Amyn A Habib
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  Anti-angiogenic and macrophage-based therapeutic strategies for glioma immunotherapy.

Authors:  Eiichi Ishikawa; Tsubasa Miyazaki; Shingo Takano; Hiroyoshi Akutsu
Journal:  Brain Tumor Pathol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 7.  Targeted Therapies for the Treatment of Glioblastoma in Adults.

Authors:  Ding Fang Chuang; Xuling Lin
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  [Lomustine and temozolomide in combination with radiotherapy : New treatment option for patients with MGMT promoter methylated Glioblastoma].

Authors:  Clemens Seidel; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  To randomize, or not to randomize, that is the question: using data from prior clinical trials to guide future designs.

Authors:  Alyssa M Vanderbeek; Steffen Ventz; Rifaquat Rahman; Geoffrey Fell; Timothy F Cloughesy; Patrick Y Wen; Lorenzo Trippa; Brian M Alexander
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  N2M2 (NOA-20) phase I/II trial of molecularly matched targeted therapies plus radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed non-MGMT hypermethylated glioblastoma.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wick; Susan Dettmer; Anne Berberich; Tobias Kessler; Irini Karapanagiotou-Schenkel; Antje Wick; Frank Winkler; Elke Pfaff; Benedikt Brors; Jürgen Debus; Andreas Unterberg; Martin Bendszus; Christel Herold-Mende; Andreas Eisenmenger; Andreas von Deimling; David T W Jones; Stefan M Pfister; Felix Sahm; Michael Platten
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.