| Literature DB >> 28844106 |
Magdalena Broda1, Marcin Frankowski2.
Abstract
The content of selected elements: Al, B, Ba, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Sb, Si, Ti, V and Zn was determined in archaeological waterlogged oak wood from the Lednica Lake by using the inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) method. The concentration of metals (especially heavy metals) in wood is typically specified to characterise this material and evaluate the possibility to use it for industrial purposes. In case of waterlogged archaeological wood intended for further research on new methods of conservation, such an analysis is important for other reasons. As it has been confirmed by numerous conservators and researchers, the presence of metal compounds is a serious problem not only due to their destructive influence on wood tissue but also from a conservation/re-conservation perspective. Metal-containing chemicals may influence conservation treatments by reacting with substances used for wood conservation and causing irreversible damage to wooden objects. Therefore, while developing new solutions for wood conservation, a broad knowledge not only on the state of wood preservation and deterioration but also on interacting chemical factors is required. The results of the research clearly show that content of minerals in waterlogged wood excavated from the bottom of the Lednica Lake considerably exceeded the average percentage of these elements in contemporary wood, which is associated with the mineralisation process. Moreover, variability in metal content was observed between waterlogged and contemporary wood. In waterlogged wood, the highest concentrations of Ca, Fe, Mg and P were observed, while in contemporary oak wood the predominant concentrations of K, Ca, Mn and Si were determined. Statistical analysis showed the variability in content of elements between different archaeological wood zones and contemporary wood. On the basis of the results obtained, it could be concluded that the studied waterlogged wood acted as an adsorbent of elements from water and sediments. High content of metal ions can be an impediment in developing new formulations for conservation, while using this wood as an experimental material. Therefore, while planning to use new chemicals as conservation agents, the possible interactions between chemicals and metals must be taken into consideration.Entities:
Keywords: IPC-OES; Inorganic compounds; Oak; Submerging environment; Waterlogged archaeological wood
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28844106 PMCID: PMC5630655 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9972-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1A map of the Ostrów Lednicki Lake with the location of the “Poznań” bridge (Kola and Wilke 2000)
Loss of wood substance of archaeological waterlogged piles
| Waterlogged oak wood | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | H1 | H2 | H3 | |
| LWS [%] | 78.0 | 13.8 | 6.0 | 1.0 |
S sapwood, H1 outer heartwood, H2 intermediate heartwood, H3 inner heartwood
Fig. 2The cross-section of waterlogged archaeological oak wood divided into four zones: S sapwood, H1 outer heartwood, H2 middle heartwood and H3 inner heartwood
Operating conditions in Shimadzu ICPE-9820 spectrometer for analysis of wood samples
| Parameter | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Radio frequency power generator | 1.2 kW | |
| Gas type | Argon | |
| Plasma gas flow rate | 10.0 L min−1 | |
| Auxiliary gas flow rate | 0.6 L min−1 | |
| Nebulization gas flow rate | 0.7 L min−1 | |
| Plasma view | Vertical torch, axial/radial view | |
| Torch | Mini-torch (quartz) | |
| Nebulizer | Burgener NX-175 | |
| Chamber | Cyclone (glass) | |
| Drain | Gravity fed | |
| Injector tube | Quartz (1.2 mm i.d.) | |
| Background correction | 2-points | |
| Number of replicates | 3 | |
| Exposure time | 20 s | |
| Plasma viewing conditions | Axial view—all elements | |
| Sample uptake rate | 1 ml min−1 | |
| Spectrometer | Echelle optics | Range of wavelength 167 to 800 nm |
| Resolution | ≤ 0.005 at 200 nm | |
| Atmospheric removal system | Rotary vacuum pump ≤ 10 Pa | |
The wavelengths used for element contents determination and the values obtained for SRM 1515 by the ICP-OES analytical technique
| Element | Wavelength [nm] | LOD [μg L−1] | Values obtained for SRM 1515 by the ICP-OES analytical technique | Certified value (SRM 1515) [μg g−1] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | 167.081 | 15.9 | 291 ± 10 | 286 ± 9 |
| B | 249.773 | 0.69 | 26 ± 2 | 27 ± 2 |
| Ba | 455.403 | 0.17 | 48 ± 1 | 49 ± 2 |
| Ca (%) | 396.847 | 0.78 | 1.518 ± 0.011 | 1.526 ± 0.015 |
| Cd | 226.502 | 0.30 | – | – |
| Co | 228.616 | 0.49 | – | – |
| Cr | 205.552 | 0.42 | – | – |
| Cu | 324.754 | 0.96 | 5.50 ± 0.22 | 5.64 ± 0.24 |
| Fe | 259.940 | 0.11 | – | – |
| K (%) | 766.490 | 2.29 | 1.65 ± 0.04 | 1.61 ± 0.02 |
| Li | 670.784 | 0.09 | – | – |
| Mg (%) | 279.553 | 0.95 | 0.270 ± 0.006 | 0.271 ± 0.008 |
| Mn | 257.610 | 0.04 | 55 ± 1 | 54 ± 3 |
| Mo | 202.030 | 0.87 | 0.090 ± 0.011 | 0.094 ± 0.013 |
| Na | 588.995 | 3.10 | 25.0 ± 1.1 | 24.4 ± 1.2 |
| Ni | 231.604 | 0.58 | 0.89 ± 0.10 | 0.91 ± 0.12 |
| P | 177.499 | 21.1 | – | – |
| Pb | 216.999 | 3.18 | 0.462 ± 0.032 | 0.470 ± 0.024 |
| Sb | 206.833 | 4.48 | – | – |
| Si | 251.611 | 0.24 | – | – |
| Ti | 334.941 | 0.33 | – | – |
| V | 292.402 | 0.29 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.03 |
| Zn | 213.856 | 0.33 | 12.7 ± 0.2 | 12.5 ± 0.3 |
Ca, Fe, Mg and P content in oak wood
| Sample | Element content [μg g−1] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | Fe | Mg | P | |
| S | 6255 ± 51 | 3820 ± 35 | 280.5 ± 3.3 | 420.5 ± 7.5 |
| H1 | 5672 ± 43 | 4351 ± 45 | 268.5 ± 3.7 | 288.4 ± 5.2 |
| H2 | 6223 ± 55 | 3180 ± 30 | 318.5 ± 4.2 | 333.4 ± 6.6 |
| H3 | 4756 ± 32 | 1583 ± 12 | 194.2 ± 2.0 | 18.79 ± 0.42 |
| CO | 393.3 ± 3.6 | 2.504 ± 0.178 | < LOD | 13.69 ± 0.35 |
S archaeological oak sapwood, H1–H3 archaeological oak heartwood (outer, middle and inner, respectively), CO contemporary oak
Cd, Cu, Mn, Pb and Zn concentration in oak wood and water and sediments of the Lednica Lake
| Sample | Element content [μg g−1] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Cu | Mn | Pb | Zn | |
| S | 0.565 ± 0.006 | 5.038 ± 0.069 | 34.01 ± 0.29 | 8.399 ± 0.122 | 14.97 ± 0.02 |
| H1 | 0.598 ± 0.008 | 1.393 ± 0.014 | 59.28 ± 0.84 | 9.713 ± 0.143 | 2.751 ± 0.003 |
| H2 | 0.371 ± 0.004 | 1.162 ± 0.011 | 57.71 ± 0.72 | 8.138 ± 0.111 | 2.292 ± 0.003 |
| H3 | 0.171 ± 0.002 | 1.223 ± 0.011 | 39.21 ± 0.51 | 4.022 ± 0.092 | 1.116 ± 0.002 |
| CO | <LOD | 1.501 ± 0.014 | 71.43 ± 0.92 | 0.218 ± 0.007 | 0.429 ± 0.003 |
| Water [μg ml−1 l]a | n.a. | 0.027 ± 0.002 | 0.056 ± 0.006 | <LOD | 0.056 ± 0.001 |
| Sediment [μg g−1] | 1.58b | 38.89a | 103.42a | 71.5b | 147.59a |
S archaeological oak sapwood, H1–H3 archaeological oak heartwood (outer, middle and inner, respectively), CO contemporary oak, n.a. not analysed
aRybak et al. 2013
bCieslewicz and Rózanski 2010 (average content of metals determined on the basis of the measurements of sediments from 13 lakes of northern Poland)
Concentration of Al, B, Ba, K, Na, Ni, Sb and Si in oak wood and water and sediments of the Lednica Lake
| Sample | Element content [μg g−1] | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | B | Ba | K | Na | Ni | Sb | Si | |
| S | 11.43 ± 0.13 | 19.38 ± 0.33 | 15.69 ± 0.11 | 64.25 ± 0.11 | 24.79 ± 0.32 | 0.921 ± 0.011 | 3.138 ± 0.044 | 59.45 ± 0.78 |
| H1 | 6.182 ± 0.091 | 23.51 ± 0.38 | 18.42 ± 0.15 | 40.05 ± 0.08 | 12.01 ± 0.23 | 0.911 ± 0.015 | 1.829 ± 0.022 | 147.1 ± 2.28 |
| H2 | 3.633 ± 0.053 | 15.37 ± 0.24 | 7.895 ± 0.07 | 89.79 ± 0.15 | 12.24 ± 0.21 | 0.731 ± 0.009 | 2.681 ± 0.37 | 125.1 ± 1.79 |
| H3 | 2.015 ± 0.032 | 11.01 ± 0.19 | 14.96 ± 0.11 | 33.36 ± 0.08 | 33.16 ± 0.36 | 0.398 ± 0.005 | 0.145 ± 0.002 | 130.7 ± 1.87 |
| CO | 1.163 ± 0.022 | 3.416 ± 0.044 | 13.32 ± 0.12 | 500.4 ± 6.2 | 3.464 ± 0.49 | 0.083 ± 0.001 | 0.703 ± 0.009 | 70.27 ± 0.92 |
S archaeological oak sapwood, H1–H3 archaeological oak heartwood (outer, middle and inner, respectively), CO contemporary oak
Fig. 3The standardised results for the data set of the ICP-OES analysis for different zones of waterlogged wood (S sapwood, H1–H3 heartwood) and contemporary oak (CO) wood
Fig. 4The principal component analysis for the dataset of the ICP-OES analysis for different zones of waterlogged wood (S sapwood, H1–H3 heartwood) and contemporary oak (CO) wood
Matrix of factor loadings calculated on the basis of elements concentration in archaeological oak wood
| Element | Factor loadings (varimax, normalised) (marked loads are > 0.700) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | |
| Al | 0.649 | 0.750 | 0.124 |
| B | 0.999 | − 0.020 | 0.013 |
| Ba | 0.524 | 0.184 | − 0.831 |
| Ca | 0.519 | 0.271 | 0.810 |
| Cd | 0.968 | 0.191 | 0.161 |
| Cu | 0.315 | 0.944 | 0.095 |
| Fe | 0.963 | 0.029 | 0.265 |
| K | − 0.023 | 0.076 | 0.996 |
| Mg | 0.460 | − 0.047 | 0.886 |
| Mn | 0.353 | − 0.881 | 0.313 |
| Na | − 0.629 | 0.542 | − 0.556 |
| Ni | 0.844 | 0.534 | 0.002 |
| P | 0.675 | 0.346 | 0.651 |
| Pb | 0.768 | 0.372 | 0.519 |
| Sb | 0.547 | 0.374 | 0.748 |
| Si | − 0.072 | − 0.962 | − 0.261 |
| Zn | 0.365 | 0.915 | 0.166 |