Christopher P Salas-Wright1, Michael G Vaughn2, Trenette T Clark Goings3, David Córdova4, Seth J Schwartz5. 1. School of Social Work, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: cpsw@bu.edu. 2. School of Social Work, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States. 3. School of Social Work, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States. 4. School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. 5. Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Prevention Science & Community Health, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is a critical need for the most current information available on the prevalence of substance use disorders (SUD) among immigrants vis-à-vis that of individuals born in the United States (US). We report the prevalence of SUDs among immigrants from major world regions and top immigrant-sending countries, and assess key moderators (i.e., age, gender, family income, age of migration, time in US) of the relationship between immigrant status and SUD risk. METHOD: The data source used for the present study is the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC-III, 2012-2013), a nationally representative survey of 36,309 civilian, non-institutionalized adults ages 18 and older in the US. Logistic regression was employed to examine the relationship between immigrant status and SUD risk. RESULTS: Immigrants were found to be substantially less likely than US-born individuals to be diagnosed with a past-year or lifetime SUD, including alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, and opioid use disorders. These findings held across major world region and among immigrants from the top-ten immigrant sending nations, and across differences in age, gender, family income, age of migration, and time spent in the US. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the present study provide up-to-date and cogent evidence that immigrants use alcohol and drugs, and meet criteria for SUDs, at far lower rates than do US-born individuals. Moreover, we provide new evidence that the protective effect of nativity holds for immigrants from an array of global regions and sending countries, and across key demographic and migration-related differences.
INTRODUCTION: There is a critical need for the most current information available on the prevalence of substance use disorders (SUD) among immigrants vis-à-vis that of individuals born in the United States (US). We report the prevalence of SUDs among immigrants from major world regions and top immigrant-sending countries, and assess key moderators (i.e., age, gender, family income, age of migration, time in US) of the relationship between immigrant status and SUD risk. METHOD: The data source used for the present study is the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC-III, 2012-2013), a nationally representative survey of 36,309 civilian, non-institutionalized adults ages 18 and older in the US. Logistic regression was employed to examine the relationship between immigrant status and SUD risk. RESULTS: Immigrants were found to be substantially less likely than US-born individuals to be diagnosed with a past-year or lifetime SUD, including alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, and opioid use disorders. These findings held across major world region and among immigrants from the top-ten immigrant sending nations, and across differences in age, gender, family income, age of migration, and time spent in the US. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the present study provide up-to-date and cogent evidence that immigrants use alcohol and drugs, and meet criteria for SUDs, at far lower rates than do US-born individuals. Moreover, we provide new evidence that the protective effect of nativity holds for immigrants from an array of global regions and sending countries, and across key demographic and migration-related differences.
Authors: Cory L Cobb; Seth J Schwartz; Christopher P Salas-Wright; Miguel Pinedo; Priscilla Martinez; Alan Meca; Alejandra G Isaza; Elma I Lorenzo-Blanco; Heather McClure; Flavio F Marsiglia; Charles R Martínez; Miguel Ángel Cano Journal: J Clin Psychol Date: 2020-06-27
Authors: Christopher P Salas-Wright; Rachel John; Michael G Vaughn; Rob Eschmann; Mariana Cohen; Millan AbiNader; Jorge Delva Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Sol P Juárez; Helena Honkaniemi; Nina-Katri Gustafsson; Mikael Rostila; Lisa Berg Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2022-08-05 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Eli Levitt; Bar Ainuz; Austin Pourmoussa; Juan Acuna; Mario De La Rosa; Juan Zevallos; Weize Wang; Pura Rodriguez; Grettel Castro; Mariana Sanchez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Susan D Cochran; Jane Rafferty; Robert Joseph Taylor; Vickie M Mays Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 3.390