BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for extensive esophageal carcinomas may cause severe stenosis requiring endoscopic balloon dilations (EBDs). A standard prevention method has not been established. We propose the esophageal triamcinolone acetonide (TA)-filling method as a novel local steroid administration procedure. METHODS: We enrolled 22 consecutive patients with early esophageal cancer who were treated using either subcircumferential or circumferential ESD (15 and 7 procedures, respectively) in this case series. Esophageal TA filling was performed on the day after ESD and 1 week later and was performed again if mild stenosis was found on follow-up. EBD with TA filling was performed only for severe stenosis that prevented endoscope passage. The primary endpoint was the incidence of severe stenosis. Secondary endpoints were the total number of EBDs and additional TA filling, dysphagia score, time to stenosis and to complete re-epithelialization, and any adverse events. RESULTS: The incidence of severe stenosis was 4.5% (1/22; confidence interval, .1%-22.8%), and EBD was performed 2 times in 1 patient. Mild stenosis was found in 9 patients. Additional TA filling was performed in 45.5% of patients (10/22; median, 5 times; range, 1-13). The dysphagia score deteriorated to 1 to 2 in 31.8% (7/22) but showed a final score of 0 after complete re-epithelialization in 90.9% (20/22). The median time to stenosis was 3 weeks (range, 3-4) and that to complete re-epithelialization was 7 weeks (range, 4-36). No severe adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The esophageal TA-filling method is highly effective for preventing severe stenosis after extensive esophageal ESD.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for extensive esophageal carcinomas may cause severe stenosis requiring endoscopic balloon dilations (EBDs). A standard prevention method has not been established. We propose the esophageal triamcinolone acetonide (TA)-filling method as a novel local steroid administration procedure. METHODS: We enrolled 22 consecutive patients with early esophageal cancer who were treated using either subcircumferential or circumferential ESD (15 and 7 procedures, respectively) in this case series. Esophageal TA filling was performed on the day after ESD and 1 week later and was performed again if mild stenosis was found on follow-up. EBD with TA filling was performed only for severe stenosis that prevented endoscope passage. The primary endpoint was the incidence of severe stenosis. Secondary endpoints were the total number of EBDs and additional TA filling, dysphagia score, time to stenosis and to complete re-epithelialization, and any adverse events. RESULTS: The incidence of severe stenosis was 4.5% (1/22; confidence interval, .1%-22.8%), and EBD was performed 2 times in 1 patient. Mild stenosis was found in 9 patients. Additional TA filling was performed in 45.5% of patients (10/22; median, 5 times; range, 1-13). The dysphagia score deteriorated to 1 to 2 in 31.8% (7/22) but showed a final score of 0 after complete re-epithelialization in 90.9% (20/22). The median time to stenosis was 3 weeks (range, 3-4) and that to complete re-epithelialization was 7 weeks (range, 4-36). No severe adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The esophageal TA-filling method is highly effective for preventing severe stenosis after extensive esophageal ESD.