| Literature DB >> 28843487 |
Julie Delyon1, Sylvie Chevret2, Thomas Jouary3, Sophie Dalac4, Stephane Dalle5, Bernard Guillot6, Jean-Philippe Arnault7, Marie-Françoise Avril8, Christophe Bedane9, Guido Bens10, Anne Pham-Ledard11, Sandrine Mansard12, Florent Grange13, Laurent Machet14, Nicolas Meyer15, Delphine Legoupil16, Philippe Saiag17, Zakia Idir18, Victor Renault19, Jean-François Deleuze20, Elif Hindie21, Maxime Battistella22, Nicolas Dumaz23, Samia Mourah24, Celeste Lebbe25.
Abstract
Mutated oncogenic KIT is a therapeutic target in melanoma. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial on the KIT inhibitor nilotinib in patients with unresectable melanoma harboring KIT alteration. The primary endpoint was the response rate (complete response or partial response following Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria) at 6 months. Pharmacodynamic studies using KIT sequencing, qPCR array, and immunostaining of downstream KIT effectors were performed during treatment. Twenty-five patients were included and received 400 mg oral nilotinib twice daily. At 6 months, nilotinib induced tumor response in four patients. The best overall response rate was 20% and the disease control rate was 56%, limited to patients harboring exon 11 or 13 mutations. Four patients exhibited durable response, including three persisting (3.6 and 2.8 years for two patients with stage IIIC and 2.5 years for one with IVM1b melanoma). A reduction in signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 phosphorylation and its effectors (BCL-2, MCL-1) in tumors during follow-up was significantly associated with clinical response. In the KIT-mutated melanoma cell line M230, nilotinib reduced STAT3 signaling and STAT inhibitors were as efficient as KIT inhibitors in reducing cell proliferation. Our study evidences a significant association between STAT3 inhibition and response to nilotinib, and provides a rationale for future research assessing STAT inhibitors in KIT-mutated melanoma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28843487 DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.07.839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Invest Dermatol ISSN: 0022-202X Impact factor: 8.551