Literature DB >> 28842858

Is pH Testing Necessary Before Antireflux Surgery in Patients with Endoscopic Erosive Esophagitis?

Katrin Schwameis1, Brenda Lin1, Jordan Roman1, Ketetha Olengue1, Steve Siegal2, Steven R DeMeester3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between the Los Angeles (LA) grade of esophagitis and acid exposure by pH monitoring is unclear. The aim of this study was to correlate the results of pH testing in patients with esophagitis to determine at what LA grade of esophagitis a pH test is not necessary.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of the records of all patients who underwent upper endoscopy and were found to have esophagitis graded using the LA system and who had pH monitoring from 2014 to 2016. An abnormal pH test was determined based on the DeMeester score.
RESULTS: There were 56 patients with a median age of 57 years. Esophagitis was LA grade A in 19, B in 20, C in 15 and D in 2 patients. An abnormal pH score was present in 47 patients (84%). All patients with C or D esophagitis had an abnormal pH score compared to 79% and 75% of patients with A and B esophagitis, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of LA C or D esophagitis was always associated with increased esophageal acid exposure on pH testing and is proof of reflux disease. However, pH testing is recommended prior to antireflux surgery in patients with LA A or B esophagitis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DeMeester score; Esophagitis; Gastroesophageal reflux disease; L.A. classification; pH monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28842858     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3554-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  10 in total

1.  Multivariate analysis of factors predicting outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  G M Campos; J H Peters; T R DeMeester; S Oberg; P F Crookes; S Tan; S R DeMeester; J A Hagen; C G Bremner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement.

Authors:  D Armstrong; J R Bennett; A L Blum; J Dent; F T De Dombal; J P Galmiche; L Lundell; M Margulies; J E Richter; S J Spechler; G N Tytgat; L Wallin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Relationship between gastro-oesophageal reflux pattern and severity of mucosal damage.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; G J M Hemmink; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 4.  Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag; Stephen Sweet; Christopher C Winchester; John Dent
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification.

Authors:  L R Lundell; J Dent; J R Bennett; A L Blum; D Armstrong; J P Galmiche; F Johnson; M Hongo; J E Richter; S J Spechler; G N Tytgat; L Wallin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Drug-induced esophagitis.

Authors:  G N Zografos; D Georgiadou; D Thomas; G Kaltsas; M Digalakis
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 7.  Infectious esophagitis.

Authors:  F M Sutton; D Y Graham; R W Goodgame
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1994-10

8.  Bravo catheter-free pH monitoring: normal values, concordance, optimal diagnostic thresholds, and accuracy.

Authors:  Shahin Ayazi; John C Lipham; Giuseppe Portale; Christian G Peyre; Christopher G Streets; Jessica M Leers; Steven R Demeester; Farzaneh Banki; Linda S Chan; Jeffrey A Hagen; Tom R Demeester
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Concentration of refluxed acid and esophageal mucosal injury.

Authors:  R M Bremner; P F Crookes; T R DeMeester; J H Peters; H J Stein
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 10.  Endoscopic evaluation of gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  D Armstrong
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Jun
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Adequacy of EGD Reporting: a Review of 100 Reports from 100 Endoscopists.

Authors:  Joshua A Boys; Beina Azadgoli; Mathew Martinez; Daniel S Oh; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Preoperative physiological esophageal assessment for anti-reflux surgery: A guide for surgeons on high-resolution manometry and pH testing.

Authors:  Michael Yodice; Alexandra Mignucci; Virali Shah; Christopher Ashley; Micheal Tadros
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.