Literature DB >> 28842147

Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes After Percutaneous Revascularization for Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients With a Body Mass Index of >30 kg/m2 Versus ≤30 kg/m2 (from the National Inpatient Sample).

Rajkumar Doshi1, Gaurav Rao2, Evan Shlofmitz2, Joseph Donnelly2, Perwaiz Meraj2.   

Abstract

Obesity is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality which may affect the outcomes of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). However, the exact role of obesity in patients with PAD who underwent percutaneous revascularization is not well defined. We sought to analyze in-hospital outcomes and characteristics in obese patients who underwent percutaneous treatment for PAD. We identified study cohorts who underwent percutaneous treatment for PAD from 2012 to 2014 using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnostic and procedures codes specific for PAD and endovascular treatment. Endovascular treatment included a drug-eluting stent, a bare metal stent, and an atherectomy or angioplasty in the lower extremities. Obesity was defined as a body mass index of >30 kg/m2. Patients below 18 years of age were excluded. A total of 62,445 (weighted 312,225) patients were identified. The mean age was higher in the nonobese group (64.2 vs 69.0 years, p ≤0.001). No difference existed in the primary outcome, in-hospital mortality, with the propensity score matched (1:10) analysis. Renal failure and the composite of complications were increased in obese patients. Percutaneous treatment of PAD was associated with increased length of stay (7.7 vs 7.0 days, p ≤0.001) and median cost of hospitalization ($30,602 vs $28,692, p ≤0.001) in obese patients. In conclusion, obesity did not impact in-hospital mortality in patients who underwent peripheral percutaneous revascularization. Increased adverse events, however, were seen in the obese population. The increased cost associated with the hospitalization of obese patients may be attributed to longer length of stay and greater complication.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28842147     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of hospitalisations with heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Rajkumar Doshi; Krunalkumar Patel; Neelesh Gupta; Rajeev Gupta; Perwaiz Meraj
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  In-hospital outcomes comparison of transfemoral vs transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in propensity-matched cohorts with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Rajkumar Doshi; Priyank Shah; Perwaiz M Meraj
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  In-Hospital Management and Outcomes After ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Medicaid Beneficiaries Compared With Privately Insured Individuals.

Authors:  Nirav Patel; Ankur Gupta; Rajkumar Doshi; Rajat Kalra; Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Garima Arora; Pankaj Arora
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-01

4.  The Effects of Body Mass Index on In-Hospital Mortality and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure: A Nationwide Analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed Brgdar; John Gharbin; Ayman Elawad; Sabah Khalafalla; Adey Bishaw; Abimbola F Balogun; Mohamed E Taha
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.