Literature DB >> 28842101

Navicular Stress Fracture Outcomes in Athletes: Analysis of 62 Injuries.

Amol Saxena1, Shontal A Behan2, Dallas L Valerio2, Dominick L Frosch3.   

Abstract

The optimal treatment modalities for navicular stress fractures in athletes is currently unknown for this season-ending injury. The present study evaluated factors that might be significant and affect healing outcomes, specifically focusing on the return to activity (RTA) time and a decreased desired activity (DDA) after treatment in athletes. Such considerations included previous navicular stress fractures, patient demographic data and type of sport, and initiation time of treatment. The data from 59 patients with 62 fractures were prospectively analyzed from May 2005 through July 2016. The results showed a significant correlation between a previous navicular stress fracture and decreased desired activity. The average duration of symptoms before receiving definitive treatment was 8.8 months. Computed tomography as the initial imaging modality correlated positively with a correct diagnosis (1.00). In contrast, magnetic resonance imaging, when used initially, was only 71% accurate. Runners constituted most of the cohort at 38 (61.3%). Ten other athletes were involved in jumping sports. Of the 62 injuries, 21 (33.9%) were in elite or professional athletes, all of whom were able to RTA, with 1 patient, a 38-year-old world record holding runner, having a DDA. Seven refractures (11.2%) occurred an average >5 years after the initial injury, predominantly in those aged <21 years, none with previous surgery. Eight patients (12.9%) developed postinjury arthrosis, including 1 with DDA. Patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation had a RTA of 4.56 months compared with those who had undergone nonoperative treatment, who had an average RTA of 3.97 months. Seven patients (11.2%) underwent screw removal and required a longer RTA. Overall, of the 62 injuries, the patients with 57 of the injuries (91.9%) were able to RTA at their preinjury level.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  athletics; elite; runner; sport; stress fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28842101     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  4 in total

Review 1.  Management of Midfoot Fractures and Dislocations.

Authors:  Atif Ahmed; Edward Westrick
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-12

2.  Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Combined with Computed Tomography (CT) in Patients with Stress Injury of Femoral Neck.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Shaowei Zheng; Qingwei Song; Ailian Liu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-09-05

Review 3.  Return to sport following navicular stress fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of three hundred and fifteen fractures.

Authors:  Ahmed Khalil Attia; Karim Mahmoud; Jason Bariteau; Sameh A Labib; Christopher W DiGiovanni; Pieter D'Hooghe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Treatment of Navicular Stress Fracture Accompanied by Os Supranaviculare: A Case Report.

Authors:  Woo-Jong Kim; Ki-Jin Jung; Eui-Dong Yeo; Hong-Seop Lee; Sung-Hun Won; Dhong-Won Lee; Jae-Young Ji; Sung-Joon Yoon; Yong-Cheol Hong
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.