| Literature DB >> 28841869 |
Anne Heizelmann1, Sümeyra Tasdemir1, Julian Schmidberger1, Tilmann Gräter2, Wolfgang Kratzer3, Beate Grüner4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study uses virtual touch imaging quantification (VTIQ) technology for the first time to conduct measurements of the trapezius and erector spinae muscles in a large study population. The significance of various influencing factors, such as age and sex, are also examined.Entities:
Keywords: Erector spinae; Muscles; Trapezius; Ultrasound Elastography; Virtual touch imaging quantification
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28841869 PMCID: PMC5574109 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1733-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Examination of the erector spinae muscle. Qualitative and quantitative measurements of the shear wave velocities using virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (Acuson S3000, Siemens) of the erector spinae muscle (shear wave speeds ranging from 0.5 m/s – 6.5 m/s: blue = low shear wave velocities, green = moderate shear wave velocities, red = high shear wave velocities) (Ulm University Hospital, 2013)
Mean values ± standard deviation and 95% confidence intervals
| Total ( | Males ( | Females ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left trapezius [m/s] | Mean ± SD | 2.78 ± 0.38 | 2.89 ± 0.38 | 2.71 ± 0.37 |
| 95% confidence interval | [2.73–2.83] | [2.81–2.96] | [2.65–2.77] | |
| Right trapezius [m/s] | Mean ± SD | 2.75 ± 0.37 | 2.84 ± 0.41 | 2.70 ± 0.38 |
| 95% confidence interval | [2.71–2.80] | [2.76–2.92] | [2.64–2.76] | |
| Left erector spinae [m/s] | Mean ± SD | 2.87 ± 0.55 | 2.97 ± 0.50 | 2.81 ± 0.57 |
| 95% confidence interval | [2.80–2.93] | [2.87–3.06] | [2.72–2.89] | |
| Right erector spinae [m/s] | Mean ± SD | 2.86 ± 0.57 | 3.00 ± 0.52 | 2.77 ± 0.59 |
| 95% confidence interval | [2.80–2.93] | [2.90–3.10] | [2.68–2.86] | |
| Thickness left trapezius [mm] | Mean ± SD | 11.94 ± 3.05 | 13.47 ± 3.07 | 10.93 ± 2.59 |
| 95% confidence interval | [11.58–12.30] | [12.89–14.05] | [10.54–11.32] | |
| Thickness right trapezius [mm] | Mean ± SD | 11.95 ± 2.88 | 13.21 ± 3.03 | 11.13 ± 2.44 |
| 95% confidence interval | [11.61–12.29] | [12.64–13.79] | [10.75–11.50] | |
Fig. 2Shear wave velocities in males and females. Difference between the shear wave velocities of the trapezius and erector spinae muscles in male subjects (n = 110) and female subjects (n = 168); * = statistically significant (Ulm University Hospital, 2013)
Shear wave velocities in subjects aged ≤60 and >60 years
|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | z-value |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left trapezius | 2.78 ± 0.38 | 2.81 ± 0.38 | 0.3953 | 0.3463 |
| Right trapezius | 2.74 ± 0.41 | 2.91 ± 0.23 | 2.05613 |
|
| Left erector spinae | 2.85 ± 0.52 | 3.11 ± 0.75 | 1.7048 |
|
| Right erector spinae | 2.84 ± 0.58 | 3.07 ± 0.49 | 1.9641 |
|
Data not normally distributed: Wilcoxon Two-Sample Test (z-values); * = significant
Fig. 3Physical activity. Difference in shear wave velocity of the erector spinae muscle, depending on the physical activity of the 18- to 30-year-old subjects, specified in hours per week (subdivided into ≤ 6 h per week (n = 131) and >6 h per week (n = 24); * = significant (Ulm University Hospital, 2013)
Correlation between the thickness of the trapezius and muscle elasticity
|
| Left trapezius | Right trapezius | Left erector spinae | Right erector spinae | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thickness left trapezius | Correlation coefficient r | 0.10468 | 0.11260 | 0.25657 | 0.18751 |
|
| 0.0826 | 0.0617 |
|
| |
| Thickness right trapezius | Correlation coefficient r | 0.04784 | 0.14225 | 0.26859 | 0.16656 |
|
| 0.4286 |
|
|
| |
* = significant