| Literature DB >> 28841647 |
Karl Stefic1,2, Antoine Chaillon3, Mélanie Bouvin-Pley1, Alain Moreau1, Martine Braibant1, Frédéric Bastides4, Guillaume Gras4, Louis Bernard4, Francis Barin1,2.
Abstract
Compartmentalization of HIV-1 has been observed in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients at different clinical stages. Considering the low permeability of the blood-brain barrier, we wondered if a reduced selective pressure by neutralizing antibodies (NAb) in the central nervous system (CNS) could favor the evolution of NAb-sensitive viruses in this compartment. Single genome amplification (SGA) was used to sequence full-length HIV-1 envelope variants (453 sequences) from paired CSF and blood plasma samples in 9 subjects infected by HIV variants of various clades and suffering from diverse neurologic disorders. Dynamics of viral evolution were evaluated with a bayesian coalescent approach for individuals with longitudinal samples. Pseudotyped viruses expressing envelope glycoproteins variants representative of the quasi-species present in each compartment were generated, and their sensitivity to autologous neutralization, broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) and entry inhibitors was assessed. Significant compartmentalization of HIV populations between blood and CSF were detected in 5 out of 9 subjects. Some of the previously described genetic determinants for compartmentalization in the CNS were observed regardless of the HIV-1 clade. There was no difference of sensitivity to autologous neutralization between blood- and CSF-variants, even for subjects with compartmentalization, suggesting that selective pressure by autologous NAb is not the main driver of HIV evolution in the CNS. However, we observed major differences of sensitivity to sCD4 or to at least one bNAb targeting either the N160-V1V2 site, the N332-V3 site or the CD4bs, between blood- and CSF-variants in all cases. In particular, HIV-1 variants present in the CSF were more resistant to bNAbs than their blood counterpart in some cases. Considering the possible migration from CSF to blood, the CNS could be a reservoir of bNAb resistant viruses, an observation that should be considered for immunotherapeutic approaches.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28841647 PMCID: PMC5571919 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181680
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical and virological characteristics of the study individuals and compartmentalization data.
| Subject id | Sample date (Mon/Yr) | Delay from CSF sampling | Origin | CD4 | VL | number of SGS | Analysis of compartmentalization | CSF state | Clade | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fst | Snn | SM | |||||||||
| KU | Jul-11 | -288 | BP | 5.36 | 25 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | Cp | CRF02_AG | |
| May-12 | 0 | BP | 23 | 5.77 | 10 | ||||||
| May-12 | 0 | CSF | 4.48 | 19 | |||||||
| Jun-13 | 391 | BP | 6.31 | 28 | |||||||
| GK | Nov-05 | -1978 | BP | 4.5 | 22 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | Cp | H | |
| Apr-11 | 0 | BP | 283 | 5.05 | 27 | ||||||
| Apr-11 | 0 | CSF | 6.52 | 18 | |||||||
| Apr-12 | 367 | BP | 5 | 21 | |||||||
| RO | Dec-10 | -677 | BP | 48 | 5.99 | 16 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | Cp | C |
| Oct-12 | -1 | BP | 5.82 | 19 | |||||||
| Oct-12 | 0 | CSF | 5.84 | 10 | |||||||
| KP | Oct-11 | -1147 | BP | 222 | 6.56 | 11 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | Cp | A1H |
| Dec-14 | 0 | CSF | 3.66 | 14 | |||||||
| Dec-14 | 1 | BP | 5.79 | 9 | |||||||
| MG | Apr-08 | -2 | BP | - | 4.77 | 21 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | Cp | B |
| Apr-08 | 0 | CSF | 4.92 | 18 | |||||||
| BA | Mar-14 | 0 | CSF | 135 | 4.12 | 17 | 0.43 | 0.21 | 0.30 | Eq | C |
| Mar-14 | 3 | BP | 4.52 | 19 | |||||||
| BL | Apr-14 | 0 | BP | 222 | 5.75 | 18 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.06 | Eq | A1 |
| Apr-14 | 0 | CSF | 5.12 | 21 | |||||||
| FU | Nov-13 | -2 | BP | 55 | 5.87 | 28 | 0.87 | 0.95 | 1 | Eq | B |
| Nov-13 | 0 | CSF | 4.13 | 24 | |||||||
| SE | Apr-09 | 0 | CSF | 319 | 5.98 | 22 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.49 | Eq | CRF01_AE |
| Apr-09 | 1 | BP | 5.11 | 16 | |||||||
a Patients were given anonymized codes.
b delay of longitudinal samples before or after the CSF sample is shown in days.
c CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; BP = blood plasma
d CD4 = blood CD4+ T cell count, at time of lumbar puncture, in cells/mm3.
e VL = viral load; HIV RNA in log10 copies/mL.
f number of single genome sequencing (SGS) amplicons.
g Three methods were used to detect genetic compartmentalization between viral populations in the blood plasma and CSF: Wright’s measure of population subdivision (Fst), the Nearest-neighbor statistic (Snn) and the Slatkin-Maddison test (SM); P values < 0.01 account for significant genetic compartmentalization.
h CSF and blood viral populations were defined compartmentalized (Cp) based on 1) topology of the phylogenetic trees and, 2) three concordant significant compartmentalization tests (P < 0.01), or otherwise equilibrated (Eq).
i Subtype was identified by several methods (REGA Subtying tool [27], Comet [28], HIV BLAST [29] and phylogeny using Maximum Likelihood). Subtyping was concordant for all the cases except for patient KU whose strain was classified CRF02_AG by the first three methods but other approaches suggested a more complex unique recombinant form (Recombinant Identification Program [30] and phylogeny using Maximum Likelihood).
Fig 1Phylogenetic relationships of paired CSF and blood plasma viral sequences.
Neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees representing (A) compartmentalized and (B) equilibrated viral populations. Env sequences from the CSF (blue squares) and blood plasma (red triangles) are shown. Bootstrap values > 0.7 are mentioned (*) next to each node. Genetic distance is indicated with a scale bar (number of nucleotide substitutions per site).
Fig 2Amino acid diversity of HIV-1 env among contemporaneous CSF and plasma viral populations.
(A) Box plot representing, for each patient, amino acid mean average pairwise distance (APD) between SGS sequences in paired CSF (white) and plasma (black) samples. Patients are grouped according to evidence of compartmentalization in CSF (* = significant difference between CSF and plasma population diversity by t-test, p < 0.001). (B) Mean APD between compartments (BC-APD, CSF vs. plasma) is shown for all patients. BC-APD was significantly greater for subject with compartmentalized viral populations (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.02). (C) BC-APD was calculated across all regions of HIV-1 env for subjects with (black box plot) or without (grey box plot) evidence of CSF compartmentalization. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs ranked test and the Mann-Whitney test were used to determine p-values for paired observations (CSF vs. plasma) and observations between viral population structures (compartmentalized vs. equilibrated), respectively. Non-significant p-values are not represented. Compart.: evidence of CSF viral compartmentalization.
Fig 3Time scaled Bayesian evolution trees for subjects RO (A), KP (B), GK (C) and KU (D).
Blue squares and red triangles (full symbols at time of CSF collection, empty symbols for the other time points) represent CSF and blood plasma derived variants, respectively. Asterisks indicate posterior probability > 0.7 and timescale is in years from the last time point, e.g. the latest sample. A schematic time scale indicating the sampling dates of CSF and plasma (blue and red arrows, respectively), as well as periods of antiretroviral treatment (ART) in green and successful therapy with undetectable viral loads in purple, is shown at the bottom of each Fig. Hatched bars correspond to periods with intermittent treatment and/or poor adherence.
Fig 4Sensitivity to neutralization by autologous antibodies of pseudotyped viruses from CSF and blood plasma samples from subjects with (A) or without (B) CSF compartmentalization.
IgG were purified from sera taken at different time points for each patient (see abscissa). Pseudotyped viruses from contemporary CSF and plasma, as well as pseudotyped viruses from previous or subsequent plasma samples (see legend inserts), were exposed to serial dilutions of IgG purified from autologous sequential sera. The amount of IgG was normalized at the same starting concentration for all samples for each patient (approximately 1 g/L). Blue: CSF viruses. Red: plasma viruses.
Fig 5Sensitivity to broadly neutralizing antibodies and entry inhibitors of pseudotyped viruses from CSF and blood plasma samples from subjects with (A) or without (B) CSF compartmentalization.
Paired pseudotyped viruses from CSF and blood were exposed to serial dilutions of bNAbs, sCD4 or maraviroc (MVC). Values indicate IC in μg/mL for bNAbs and sCD4 and in nmol/mL for MVC. Ratios showing a greater resistance of CSF viruses or a greater resistance of blood viruses (ratio > 3) are mentioned in blue or in red, respectively.
Fig 6Sites identified as possibly involved in compartmentalization.
Dominant amino acids (AA) at positions with statistically significant difference between CSF (C) and plasma (P) for at least 2 subjects or at position previously reported (*) are shown (p < 0.05). In bold, AA that met Bonferroni adjusted statistical significance. These positions were identified only in patients with compartmentalization (highlighted in blue). HxB2 gp160 numbering is indicated. (**) Differences observed at a position shared by several patients but below the significance threshold.
Fig 7V1V2 and V4 loops length and charge differences of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein in CSF compartmentalized viral populations.
Histograms representing the difference between mean length or charge of V1V2 (A and B respectively) and V4 loops (C and D respectively) of single genome sequences from CSF compared to contemporaneous plasma. Patients are grouped according to evidence of compartmentalization in CSF (* = significant difference between CSF and plasma population by the Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.05).