Michael H Andreae1, Singh Nair2, Jonah S Gabry3, Ben Goodrich4, Charles Hall5, Naum Shaparin2. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey PA 17033, United States. Electronic address: mandreae@pennstatehealth.psu.edu. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY, 10467 Bronx, NY, United States. 3. Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy (ISERP), Columbia University of the City of New York, International Affairs Building, 420 West 118th St, New York, NY 10027, United States. 4. Department of Political Science, Columbia University in the City of New York, International Affairs Building, 420 West 118th Street, New York, NY 10027, United States. 5. Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461, United States.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We investigated if human reminder phone calls in the patient's preferred language increase adherence with scheduled appointments in an inner-city chronic pain clinic. We hypothesized that language and cultural incongruence is the underlying mechanism to explain poor attendance at clinic appointments in underserved Hispanic populations. DESIGN: Pragmatic randomized controlled clinical trial SETTING:Innercity academic chronic pain clinic with a diverse, predominantly African-American and Hispanic population PATIENTS: All (n=963) adult patients with a scheduled first appointment between October 2014 and October 2015 at the Montefiore Pain Center in the Bronx, New York were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive a human reminder call in their preferred language before their appointment, or no contact. MEASUREMENTS: We recorded patients' demographic characteristics and as primary outcome attendance as scheduled, failure to attend and/or cancellation calls. We fit Bayesian and classical multinomial logistic regression models to test if the intervention improved adherence with scheduled appointments. MAIN RESULTS: Among the 953 predominantly African American and Hispanic/Latino patients, 475 patients were randomly selected to receive a language-congruent, human reminder call, while 478 were assigned to receive no prior contact, (after we excluded 10 patients, scheduled for repeat appointments). In the experimental group, 275 patients adhered to their scheduled appointment, while 84 cancelled and 116 failed to attend. In the control group, 249 patients adhered to their scheduled appointment, 31 cancelled and 198 failed to attend. Human phone reminders in the preferred language increased adherence (RR 1.89, CI95% [1.42, 1.42], (p<0.01). The intervention seemed particularly effective in Hispanic patients, supporting our hypothesis of cultural congruence as possible underlying mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: Human reminder phone calls prior in the patient's preferred language increased adherence with scheduled appointments. The intervention facilitated access to much needed care in an ethnically diverse, resource poor population, presumably by overcoming language barriers.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We investigated if human reminder phone calls in the patient's preferred language increase adherence with scheduled appointments in an inner-city chronic pain clinic. We hypothesized that language and cultural incongruence is the underlying mechanism to explain poor attendance at clinic appointments in underserved Hispanic populations. DESIGN: Pragmatic randomized controlled clinical trial SETTING: Innercity academic chronic pain clinic with a diverse, predominantly African-American and Hispanic population PATIENTS: All (n=963) adult patients with a scheduled first appointment between October 2014 and October 2015 at the Montefiore Pain Center in the Bronx, New York were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS:Patients were randomized to receive a human reminder call in their preferred language before their appointment, or no contact. MEASUREMENTS: We recorded patients' demographic characteristics and as primary outcome attendance as scheduled, failure to attend and/or cancellation calls. We fit Bayesian and classical multinomial logistic regression models to test if the intervention improved adherence with scheduled appointments. MAIN RESULTS: Among the 953 predominantly African American and Hispanic/Latino patients, 475 patients were randomly selected to receive a language-congruent, human reminder call, while 478 were assigned to receive no prior contact, (after we excluded 10 patients, scheduled for repeat appointments). In the experimental group, 275 patients adhered to their scheduled appointment, while 84 cancelled and 116 failed to attend. In the control group, 249 patients adhered to their scheduled appointment, 31 cancelled and 198 failed to attend. Human phone reminders in the preferred language increased adherence (RR 1.89, CI95% [1.42, 1.42], (p<0.01). The intervention seemed particularly effective in Hispanic patients, supporting our hypothesis of cultural congruence as possible underlying mechanism. CONCLUSIONS:Human reminder phone calls prior in the patient's preferred language increased adherence with scheduled appointments. The intervention facilitated access to much needed care in an ethnically diverse, resource poor population, presumably by overcoming language barriers.
Authors: Lisa C Campbell; Kristynia Robinson; Salimah H Meghani; April Vallerand; Michael Schatman; Nomita Sonty Journal: J Pain Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Jeanine Suurmond; Ellen Uiters; Martine C de Bruijne; Karien Stronks; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Stephan R Maman; Michael H Andreae; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Zachary A Turnbull; Robert S White Journal: J Comp Eff Res Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 1.744
Authors: Timothy M Connolly; Robert S White; Dahniel L Sastow; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Zachary A Turnbull; Lisa Q Rong Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Hannah F Xu; Robert S White; Dahniel L Sastow; Michael H Andreae; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Zachary A Turnbull Journal: J Clin Anesth Date: 2017-09-30 Impact factor: 9.452
Authors: Erica J Weinstein; Jacob L Levene; Marc S Cohen; Doerthe A Andreae; Jerry Y Chao; Matthew Johnson; Charles B Hall; Michael H Andreae Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-06-20
Authors: Erica J Weinstein; Jacob L Levene; Marc S Cohen; Doerthe A Andreae; Jerry Y Chao; Matthew Johnson; Charles B Hall; Michael H Andreae Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-04-25